• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Single-Port Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Where Do We Stand?单孔机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术:我们处于什么位置?
Curr Oncol. 2023 Apr 20;30(4):4301-4310. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30040328.
2
Pure Single-site Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Using Single-port Versus Multiport Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: A Single-institution Comparative Study.单纯单部位机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与多部位机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的比较:单中心研究。
Eur Urol Focus. 2021 Sep;7(5):964-972. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.10.006. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
3
A Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes Between Single-port and Multiport Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy.单孔与多孔机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术围手术期结局比较。
Eur Urol. 2020 Jun;77(6):671-674. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.03.031. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
4
A comparison of perioperative outcomes between extraperitoneal robotic single-port and multiport radical prostatectomy with the da Vinci Si Surgical System.经腹腔入路机器人单孔与多孔前列腺根治术与达芬奇 Si 手术系统的围手术期结局比较。
Asian J Androl. 2021 Nov-Dec;23(6):640-647. doi: 10.4103/aja.aja_50_21.
5
Magnet-Assisted Robotic Prostatectomy Using the da Vinci SP Robot: An Initial Case Series.达芬奇 SP 机器人辅助磁导航前列腺切除术:初步病例系列。
J Endourol. 2019 Oct;33(10):829-834. doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0263. Epub 2019 Sep 27.
6
Perioperative Outcomes of Single vs Multi-Port Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Single Institutional Experience.单孔与多孔机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的围手术期结局:单中心经验。
J Urol. 2020 Sep;204(3):490-495. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000811. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
7
Single-port robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial experience and technique with the da Vinci SP platform.单孔机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术:达芬奇 SP 平台的初步经验和技术。
BJU Int. 2019 Dec;124(6):1022-1027. doi: 10.1111/bju.14864. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
8
Extraperitoneal Single-Port Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.经腹膜外单孔机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术。
J Endourol. 2021 Sep;35(S2):S100-S105. doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0440.
9
Single-port versus multiport robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis on the da Vinci SP platform.单孔与多孔机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术:达芬奇 SP 平台的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Prostate. 2022 Mar;82(4):405-414. doi: 10.1002/pros.24296. Epub 2022 Jan 5.
10
Technical Modifications Necessary to Implement the da Vinci Single-port Robotic System.实施达芬奇单孔机器人系统所需的技术修改。
Eur Urol. 2020 Sep;78(3):415-423. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.01.005. Epub 2020 Jan 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with novel robotic platforms vs da Vinci multiport systems: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.新型机器人平台与达芬奇多端口系统辅助下根治性前列腺切除术的疗效:一项系统评价与网状Meta分析
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2025 Sep 8. doi: 10.1038/s41391-025-01023-1.
2
Perioperative efficiency and clinical outcomes of single-port versus multi-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: an updated meta-analysis.单孔与多孔机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的围手术期效率和临床结果:一项更新的荟萃分析。
J Robot Surg. 2025 Aug 18;19(1):492. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02679-6.
3
Learning curve analysis of extraperitoneal single-site robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a CUSUM-based approach.腹膜外单孔机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的学习曲线分析:一种基于累积和(CUSUM)的方法。
J Robot Surg. 2025 Jan 10;19(1):49. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02202-3.
4
The Current Role of Single-Site Robotic Approach in Liver Resection: A Systematic Review.单部位机器人手术入路在肝切除术中的当前作用:一项系统评价
Life (Basel). 2024 Jul 19;14(7):894. doi: 10.3390/life14070894.
5
Single port robot-assisted radical and simple prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.单孔机器人辅助根治性和单纯性前列腺切除术:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2025 Mar;28(1):117-128. doi: 10.1038/s41391-024-00787-2. Epub 2024 Jan 23.
6
Robotic surgery in urology: Recent advances.泌尿外科机器人手术:最新进展
Asian J Urol. 2023 Oct;10(4):385-387. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2023.08.005. Epub 2023 Aug 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Retzius-sparing robotic prostatectomy is associated with higher positive surgical margin rate in anterior tumors, but not in posterior tumors, compared to conventional anterior robotic prostatectomy.与传统的前入路机器人前列腺切除术相比,保留雷氏间隙的机器人前列腺切除术在前部肿瘤中的手术切缘阳性率更高,但在后部肿瘤中并非如此。
Prostate Int. 2023 Mar;11(1):13-19. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2022.07.005. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
2
Retzius-sparing vs. standard robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for clinically localised prostate cancer: a comparative study.保留Retzius 间隙与标准机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术治疗局限性前列腺癌的比较研究。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2023 Sep;26(3):568-574. doi: 10.1038/s41391-022-00625-3. Epub 2022 Nov 29.
3
Single-port Extraperitoneal and Transperitoneal Radical Prostatectomy: A Multi-Institutional Propensity-Score Matched Study.单孔腹膜外和经腹膜根治性前列腺切除术:一项多机构倾向评分匹配研究。
Urology. 2023 Jan;171:140-145. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.10.001. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
4
Comparison of Three Approaches to Single-Port Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Our Institution's Initial Experience.三种单孔机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术方法的比较:本机构的初步经验。
J Endourol. 2022 Dec;36(12):1551-1558. doi: 10.1089/end.2022.0330. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
5
Single-port Robotic Transvesical Partial Prostatectomy for Localized Prostate Cancer: Initial Series and Description of Technique.单孔机器人经膀胱前列腺部分切除术治疗局限性前列腺癌:初步系列研究和技术描述。
Eur Urol. 2022 Nov;82(5):551-558. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.07.017. Epub 2022 Aug 13.
6
Single-port transvesical versus open simple prostatectomy: a perioperative comparative study.经单孔经膀胱前列腺切除术与开放性单纯前列腺切除术的围手术期对比研究。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2023 Sep;26(3):538-542. doi: 10.1038/s41391-022-00566-x. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
7
Pure single-port retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with the da Vinci SP: Initial experience and technique description.使用达芬奇单孔手术系统进行保留Retzius间隙的纯单孔机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术:初步经验及技术描述
BJUI Compass. 2022 Jan 12;3(3):251-256. doi: 10.1002/bco2.131. eCollection 2022 May.
8
Single-port versus multiport robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis on the da Vinci SP platform.单孔与多孔机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术:达芬奇 SP 平台的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Prostate. 2022 Mar;82(4):405-414. doi: 10.1002/pros.24296. Epub 2022 Jan 5.
9
Single-Port versus Multiple-Port Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.单孔与多孔机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2021 Dec 7;10(24):5723. doi: 10.3390/jcm10245723.
10
Single-Port Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Feasibility and Early Outcomes.单孔保留耻骨前列腺韧带的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术:可行性和早期结果。
J Endourol. 2022 May;36(5):620-625. doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0542. Epub 2022 Jan 12.

单孔机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术:我们处于什么位置?

Single-Port Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Where Do We Stand?

机构信息

Department of Urology, Rush University, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.

Department of Urology, Sant'Andrea Hospital, La Sapienza University, 00189 Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Curr Oncol. 2023 Apr 20;30(4):4301-4310. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30040328.

DOI:10.3390/curroncol30040328
PMID:37185441
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10136812/
Abstract

In 2018, the da Vinci Single Port (SP) robotic system was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for urologic procedures. Available studies for the application of SP to prostate cancer surgery are limited. The aim of our study is to summarize the current evidence on the techniques and outcomes of SP robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (SP-RARLP) procedures. A narrative review of the literature was performed in January 2023. Preliminary results suggest that SP-RALP is safe and feasible, and it can offer comparable outcomes to the standard multiport RALP. Extraperitoneal and transvesical SP-RALP appear to be the two most promising approaches, as they offer decreased invasiveness, potentially shorter length of stay, and better pain control. Long-term, high-quality data are missing and further validation with prospective studies across different sites is required.

摘要

2018 年,达芬奇单端口(SP)机器人系统获得美国食品和药物管理局批准,可用于泌尿科手术。目前应用 SP 进行前列腺癌手术的研究有限。我们的研究旨在总结 SP 机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(SP-RARLP)的技术和结果。2023 年 1 月进行了文献的叙述性综述。初步结果表明,SP-RALP 安全可行,可提供与标准多端口 RALP 相当的结果。经腹腔外和经膀胱 SP-RALP 似乎是两种最有前途的方法,因为它们具有侵入性更小、潜在住院时间更短和更好的疼痛控制。目前缺乏长期、高质量的数据,需要在不同地点进行前瞻性研究来进一步验证。