McLean Hospital, Belmont, Mass. (Lebois, Baker, Wolff, Lambros, Grinspoon, Winternitz, Gönenç, Gruber, Ressler, Kaufman); Harvard Medical School, Boston (Lebois, Baker, Winternitz, Gönenç, Gruber, Ressler, Kaufman); Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Mass. (Li, Wang, Ren, Liu); Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Capital Medical University, Beijing (Liu); Department of Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston (Liu).
Am J Psychiatry. 2021 Feb 1;178(2):165-173. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2020.19060647. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
Dissociative experiences commonly occur in response to trauma, and while their presence strongly affects treatment approaches in posttraumatic spectrum disorders, their etiology remains poorly understood and their phenomenology incompletely characterized. Methods to reliably assess the severity of dissociation symptoms, without relying solely on self-report, would have tremendous clinical utility. Brain-based measures have the potential to augment symptom reports, although it remains unclear whether brain-based measures of dissociation are sufficiently sensitive and robust to enable individual-level estimation of dissociation severity based on brain function. The authors sought to test the robustness and sensitivity of a brain-based measure of dissociation severity.
An intrinsic network connectivity analysis was applied to functional MRI scans obtained from 65 women with histories of childhood abuse and current posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The authors tested for continuous measures of trauma-related dissociation using the Multidimensional Inventory of Dissociation. Connectivity estimates were derived with a novel machine learning technique using individually defined homologous functional regions for each participant.
The models achieved moderate ability to estimate dissociation, after controlling for childhood trauma and PTSD severity. Connections that contributed the most to the estimation mainly involved the default mode and frontoparietal control networks. By contrast, all models performed at chance levels when using a conventional group-based network parcellation.
Trauma-related dissociative symptoms, distinct from PTSD and childhood trauma, can be estimated on the basis of network connectivity. Furthermore, between-network brain connectivity may provide an unbiased estimate of symptom severity, paving the way for more objective, clinically useful biomarkers of dissociation and advancing our understanding of its neural mechanisms.
分离体验通常是对创伤的反应,尽管它们的存在强烈影响创伤后谱障碍的治疗方法,但它们的病因仍知之甚少,其表现也不完全明确。有可靠的方法来评估分离症状的严重程度,而不单单依赖于自我报告,这将具有巨大的临床应用价值。基于大脑的测量方法有可能增强症状报告,尽管尚不清楚基于大脑的分离测量方法是否足够敏感和稳健,从而能够基于大脑功能对个体的分离严重程度进行估计。作者试图测试分离严重程度的基于大脑的测量方法的稳健性和敏感性。
对 65 名有儿童期虐待史和当前创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的女性进行功能磁共振成像扫描,应用内在网络连接分析。作者使用多维分离量表测试与创伤相关的连续分离测量值。使用为每个参与者单独定义的同源功能区域的新机器学习技术来得出连接估计值。
在控制了儿童期创伤和 PTSD 严重程度后,这些模型对分离的估计能力达到中等水平。对估计贡献最大的连接主要涉及默认模式和额顶叶控制网络。相比之下,当使用常规的基于群组的网络分割时,所有模型的表现都处于随机水平。
与 PTSD 和儿童期创伤不同的与创伤相关的分离症状可以根据网络连接进行估计。此外,跨网络的大脑连接可能提供症状严重程度的无偏估计,为更客观、更具临床实用价值的分离生物标志物铺平道路,并推进我们对其神经机制的理解。