Suppr超能文献

知情同意与欺骗参与者后的解释说明:研究伦理准则的系统综述

Informed Consent and Debriefing When Deceiving Participants: A Systematic Review of Research Ethics Guidelines.

机构信息

Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Department of Philosophy and Bioethics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.

出版信息

J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2023 Jul;18(3):118-133. doi: 10.1177/15562646231173477. Epub 2023 May 15.

Abstract

Informed consent and debriefing of research participants in studies that use deception are ethical safeguards for which existing scholarly work on their implementation remains variable and insufficiently clear. A systematic review of research ethics guidelines was conducted to sketch a picture of whether, why and how informed consent and debriefing are recommended when using deception. Documents roughly agreed on several general principles, but varied significantly in the specifics of why and whether these safeguards are necessary, in which conditions and how they should be implemented. Various aspects that appear in the literature could not be found in the guidelines. In our review, guidance was integrated and showed a variation of implementation strategies that could help in contextualizing these safeguards.

摘要

知情同意和研究参与者的情况介绍在使用欺骗手段的研究中是伦理保障,关于其实施的现有学术研究仍然存在差异且不够清晰。我们对研究伦理准则进行了系统审查,以了解在使用欺骗手段时是否推荐、为什么推荐以及如何推荐知情同意和情况介绍。这些文件大致同意一些一般原则,但在为什么以及这些保障措施是否必要、在哪些情况下以及如何实施这些保障措施的具体细节上存在显著差异。文献中出现的各种方面在准则中并没有找到。在我们的综述中,指导方针得到了整合,并展示了各种实施策略的差异,这有助于将这些保障措施纳入具体情况。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验