• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

量化词汇学习信念与策略——古氏(2018年)词汇学习问卷越南语版的效度研究

Quantifying vocabulary learning belief and strategy - A validation study of the Vietnamese version of Gu's (2018) vocabulary learning questionnaire.

作者信息

Trang Nguyen Huynh, Truong Duy Vinh, Ha Hung Tan

机构信息

School of Foreign Languages, University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2023 May 1;9(5):e16009. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16009. eCollection 2023 May.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16009
PMID:37187906
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10176061/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The field of language teaching and learning has long recognized the role of vocabulary knowledge in all aspects of language proficiency and indicated that vocabulary beliefs and learning strategies play a pivotal role in learners' vocabulary development. As a result, understanding learners' beliefs and strategies in vocabulary learning is of paramount importance to language teachers. The Vocabulary Learning Questionnaire (VLQ) developed by Peter Gu in 2018 could be considered the most recent, validated instrument for the measurement of vocabulary learning beliefs and strategies. However, the VLQ contains too many items and is only available in English. The objectives of the study, therefore, are (1) to develop and validate a Vietnamese version of the VLQ which can exclude construct-irrelevant noises related to L2 comprehension, and (2) to reduce the number of items while retaining the key factors in the instruments.

METHODS

722 Vietnamese university students took part in the study. Exploratory factor analyses (EFA) and confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) were examined with the free software Jamovi 2.3.13. Both Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega were employed to evaluate the factors' internal consistency.

RESULTS

Separate EFAs confirmed the two dimensions of vocabulary beliefs, explaining 62.6% of the total variance, and seven factors of vocabulary strategies, predicting 72.1% of the total variance. CFAs confirmed the hypothesized 9-dimensional structures of different vocabulary learning beliefs and strategies and offer cross-validation evidence for the Vietnamese VLQ. Reliability metrics demonstrated acceptable internal reliability for vocabulary belief and strategy sub-scales.

CONCLUSION

The Vietnamese VLQ provides a validated measure of vocabulary beliefs and strategies. The 30-item version of the Vietnamese VLQ serves as a starting point for future research in the field of vocabulary learning and teaching in Vietnam.

摘要

背景

语言教学领域长期以来一直认识到词汇知识在语言能力各个方面的作用,并指出词汇信念和学习策略在学习者的词汇发展中起着关键作用。因此,了解学习者在词汇学习中的信念和策略对语言教师至关重要。彼得·顾于2018年编制的《词汇学习问卷》(VLQ)可被视为测量词汇学习信念和策略的最新、经过验证的工具。然而,VLQ包含的项目过多,且只有英文版。因此,本研究的目标是:(1)开发并验证一个越南语版的VLQ,该版本可以排除与二语理解相关的结构无关噪音;(2)减少项目数量,同时保留工具中的关键因素。

方法

722名越南大学生参与了本研究。使用免费软件Jamovi 2.3.13进行探索性因素分析(EFA)和验证性因素分析(CFA)。同时采用克朗巴哈系数和麦克唐纳欧米伽系数来评估各因素的内部一致性。

结果

单独的EFA证实了词汇信念的两个维度,解释了总方差的62.6%,以及词汇策略的七个因素,预测了总方差的72.1%。CFA证实了不同词汇学习信念和策略的假设九维结构,并为越南语VLQ提供了交叉验证证据。可靠性指标表明,词汇信念和策略子量表具有可接受的内部可靠性。

结论

越南语VLQ提供了一个经过验证的词汇信念和策略测量工具。越南语VLQ的30项版本为越南词汇学习与教学领域的未来研究提供了一个起点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81bc/10176061/e4f838275196/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81bc/10176061/d42ff799f652/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81bc/10176061/dbba87e5acbe/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81bc/10176061/e4f838275196/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81bc/10176061/d42ff799f652/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81bc/10176061/dbba87e5acbe/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81bc/10176061/e4f838275196/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Quantifying vocabulary learning belief and strategy - A validation study of the Vietnamese version of Gu's (2018) vocabulary learning questionnaire.量化词汇学习信念与策略——古氏(2018年)词汇学习问卷越南语版的效度研究
Heliyon. 2023 May 1;9(5):e16009. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16009. eCollection 2023 May.
2
Vocabulary Learning in Chinese as a Second Language: Exploring the Role of Self-Regulation in Facilitating Vocabulary Knowledge of Second Language Learners.将汉语作为第二语言的词汇学习:探究自我调节在促进第二语言学习者词汇知识方面的作用。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 15;13:893900. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.893900. eCollection 2022.
3
Strategy Use in Second Language Vocabulary Learning and Its Relationships With the Breadth and Depth of Vocabulary Knowledge: A Structural Equation Modeling Study.第二语言词汇学习中的策略运用及其与词汇知识广度和深度的关系:一项结构方程模型研究
Front Psychol. 2020 May 13;11:752. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00752. eCollection 2020.
4
The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers.中文版的感知压力问卷:医学生和医务人员的编制与验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Mar 13;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01307-1.
5
Vietnamese version of the coronary artery disease education questionnaire-Short version: Translation, adaptation and validation.冠心病教育问卷越南语短版:翻译、改编和验证。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2020 Aug;45(4):691-697. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13145. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
6
Validation of the Behavioral Anger Response Questionnaire for Children (BARQ-C) in a large community sample of Vietnamese middle adolescents in Hanoi.验证《儿童行为愤怒反应问卷》(BARQ-C)在河内越南青少年中大型社区样本中的有效性。
BMC Psychol. 2022 Aug 12;10(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-00907-4.
7
Spanish-speaking English learners' English language and literacy skills: The predictive role of conceptually-scored vocabulary.说西班牙语的英语学习者的英语语言和读写能力:概念评分词汇的预测作用。
Appl Psycholinguist. 2020 Jan;41(1):1-24. doi: 10.1017/s0142716419000365. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
8
Assessment of the validity and reliability of the Vietnamese version of the Breast Cancer Screening Beliefs Questionnaire.越南版乳腺癌筛查信念问卷的有效性和可靠性评估。
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2021 Dec 25;9(1):69-74. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2021.11.003. eCollection 2022 Jan.
9
Psychometric properties of the newly developed Physician Teaching Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PTSQ).新开发的医师教学自我效能量表(PTSQ)的心理测量学特性。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Sep 22;16(1):247. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0764-4.
10
The impact of COVID-19 and its terminology learning strategies on EFL learners' vocabulary repertoire.新冠疫情及其术语学习策略对英语外语学习者词汇储备的影响。
Ampersand (Oxford). 2023;10:100119. doi: 10.1016/j.amper.2023.100119. Epub 2023 Apr 15.

引用本文的文献

1
A Continuous Improvement Instrument for the evaluationof the ergonomics management system in the supply chain.一种用于评估供应链中人体工程学管理系统的持续改进工具。
Heliyon. 2024 Dec 5;10(24):e40956. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40956. eCollection 2024 Dec 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Lexical Profile of Newspapers Revisited: A Corpus-Based Analysis.重新审视报纸的词汇概况:基于语料库的分析
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 24;13:800983. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.800983. eCollection 2022.
2
Vocabulary Demands of Informal Spoken English Revisited: What Does It Take to Understand Movies, TV Programs, and Soap Operas?再探非正式英语口语的词汇要求:理解电影、电视节目和肥皂剧需要具备什么?
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 21;13:831684. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.831684. eCollection 2022.
3
Thanks Coefficient Alpha, We Still Need You!感谢克朗巴哈系数α,我们依然需要你!
Educ Psychol Meas. 2019 Feb;79(1):200-210. doi: 10.1177/0013164417725127. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
4
Thanks coefficient alpha, we'll take it from here.谢谢克朗巴哈系数,接下来我们自己来。
Psychol Methods. 2018 Sep;23(3):412-433. doi: 10.1037/met0000144. Epub 2017 May 29.
5
Best Alternatives to Cronbach's Alpha Reliability in Realistic Conditions: Congeneric and Asymmetrical Measurements.现实条件下克朗巴哈α信度的最佳替代方法:同属与不对称测量
Front Psychol. 2016 May 26;7:769. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00769. eCollection 2016.
6
Multivariate analysis: the need for data, and other problems.多变量分析:数据需求及其他问题
Br J Psychiatry. 1975 Mar;126:237-40. doi: 10.1192/bjp.126.3.237.