• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞治疗下的淋巴瘤分期:影像反应标准不一致的原因。

Staging of lymphoma under chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy: reasons for discordance among imaging response criteria.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.

Laboratory for Translational Cancer Immunology, Gene Center of the LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Cancer Imaging. 2023 May 15;23(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s40644-023-00566-7.

DOI:10.1186/s40644-023-00566-7
PMID:37189191
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10184388/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CART) prolongs survival for patients with refractory or relapsed lymphoma. Discrepancies among different response criteria for lymphoma under CART were recently shown. Our objective was to evaluate reasons for discordance among different response criteria and their relation to overall survival.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with baseline and follow-up imaging at 30 (FU1) and 90 days (FU2) after CART were included. Overall response was determined based on Lugano, Cheson, response evaluation criteria in lymphoma (RECIL) and lymphoma response to immunomodulatory therapy criteria (LYRIC). Overall response rate (ORR) and rates of progressive disease (PD) were determined. For each criterion reasons for PD were analyzed in detail.

RESULTS

41 patients were included. ORR was 68%, 68%, 63%, and 68% at FU2 by Lugano, Cheson, RECIL, and LYRIC, respectively. PD rates differed among criteria with 32% by Lugano, 27% by Cheson, 17% by RECIL, and 17% by LYRIC. Dominant reasons for PD according to Lugano were target lesion (TL) progression (84.6%), new appearing lesions (NL; 53.8%), non-TL progression (27.3%), and progressive metabolic disease (PMD; 15.4%). Deviations among the criteria for defining PD were largely explained by PMD of preexisting lesions that are defined as PD only by Lugano and non-TL progression, which is not defined as PD by RECIL and in some cases classified as indeterminate response by LYRIC.

CONCLUSIONS

Following CART, lymphoma response criteria show differences in imaging endpoints, especially in defining PD. The response criteria must be considered when interpreting imaging endpoints and outcomes from clinical trials.

摘要

背景

嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞疗法(CART)可延长复发或难治性淋巴瘤患者的生存期。最近显示,CART 下淋巴瘤的不同反应标准之间存在差异。我们的目的是评估不同反应标准之间差异的原因及其与总生存期的关系。

方法

连续纳入基线和 CART 后 30 天(FU1)和 90 天(FU2)随访成像的患者。根据 Lugano、Cheson、淋巴瘤反应评估标准(RECIL)和淋巴瘤免疫调节治疗反应标准(LYRIC)确定总反应。确定总缓解率(ORR)和进展性疾病(PD)率。详细分析了每个标准中 PD 的原因。

结果

共纳入 41 例患者。FU2 时 Lugano、Cheson、RECIL 和 LYRIC 的 ORR 分别为 68%、68%、63%和 68%。根据 Lugano,PD 率在标准之间存在差异,为 32%;Cheson 为 27%;RECIL 为 17%;LYRIC 为 17%。根据 Lugano,PD 的主要原因是靶病灶(TL)进展(84.6%)、新出现病灶(NL;53.8%)、非-TL 进展(27.3%)和进行性代谢疾病(PMD;15.4%)。定义 PD 的标准之间的差异主要由先前存在的病变的 PMD 解释,仅 Lugano 将其定义为 PD,而非 TL 进展在 RECIL 中不被定义为 PD,在某些情况下,LYRIC 将其归类为不确定反应。

结论

CART 后,淋巴瘤反应标准在影像学终点方面存在差异,尤其是在定义 PD 方面。在解释影像学终点和临床试验结果时,必须考虑反应标准。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f6d/10184388/16d4721ccf00/40644_2023_566_Figb_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f6d/10184388/514002e99a06/40644_2023_566_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f6d/10184388/6a1d3c75cf21/40644_2023_566_Figa_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f6d/10184388/4c48679106f0/40644_2023_566_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f6d/10184388/305f496a2cea/40644_2023_566_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f6d/10184388/16d4721ccf00/40644_2023_566_Figb_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f6d/10184388/514002e99a06/40644_2023_566_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f6d/10184388/6a1d3c75cf21/40644_2023_566_Figa_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f6d/10184388/4c48679106f0/40644_2023_566_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f6d/10184388/305f496a2cea/40644_2023_566_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f6d/10184388/16d4721ccf00/40644_2023_566_Figb_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Staging of lymphoma under chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy: reasons for discordance among imaging response criteria.嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞治疗下的淋巴瘤分期:影像反应标准不一致的原因。
Cancer Imaging. 2023 May 15;23(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s40644-023-00566-7.
2
Modification of Lugano criteria by pre-infusion tumor kinetics improves early survival prediction for patients with lymphoma under chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy.基于输注前肿瘤动力学的卢加诺标准修正可改善嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞治疗的淋巴瘤患者的早期生存预测。
J Immunother Cancer. 2023 Oct;11(10). doi: 10.1136/jitc-2022-006659.
3
Prognostic value of pre-infusion tumor growth rate for patients with lymphoma receiving chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy.输注前肿瘤生长率对接受嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞治疗的淋巴瘤患者的预后价值。
Cytotherapy. 2023 Sep;25(9):986-992. doi: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2023.03.007. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
4
Lymphoma tumor burden before chimeric antigen receptor T-Cell treatment: RECIL vs. Lugano vs. metabolic tumor assessment.嵌合抗原受体T细胞治疗前淋巴瘤肿瘤负荷:RECIL与卢加诺标准对比代谢性肿瘤评估
Front Oncol. 2022 Sep 8;12:974029. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.974029. eCollection 2022.
5
Early F-FDG PET/CT Response Predicts Survival in Relapsed or Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma Treated with Nivolumab.早期 F-FDG PET/CT 缓解预测纳武利尤单抗治疗复发或难治性霍奇金淋巴瘤患者的生存情况。
J Nucl Med. 2020 May;61(5):649-654. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.119.232827. Epub 2019 Oct 18.
6
Prognostic value of the International Metabolic Prognostic Index for lymphoma patients receiving chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy.国际代谢预后指数对接受嵌合抗原受体T细胞疗法的淋巴瘤患者的预后价值。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023 Apr;50(5):1406-1413. doi: 10.1007/s00259-022-06075-2. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
7
RECIL versus Lugano for Treatment Response Assessment in FDG-Avid Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas: A Head-to-Head Comparison in 54 Patients.RECIL与卢加诺标准在FDG摄取阳性非霍奇金淋巴瘤治疗反应评估中的比较:54例患者的直接对比
Cancers (Basel). 2019 Dec 18;12(1):9. doi: 10.3390/cancers12010009.
8
F-FDG PET and CT Scans Detect New Imaging Patterns of Response and Progression in Patients with Hodgkin Lymphoma Treated by Anti-Programmed Death 1 Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor.氟代脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描和计算机断层扫描检测抗程序性死亡 1 免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的霍奇金淋巴瘤患者新的反应和进展成像模式。
J Nucl Med. 2018 Jan;59(1):15-24. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.117.193011. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
9
A comparison of the prognostic performance of the Lugano 2014 and RECIL 2017 response criteria in patients with NHL from the phase III GOYA and GALLIUM trials.来自III期GOYA和GALLIUM试验的非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者中,Lugano 2014和RECIL 2017缓解标准的预后性能比较。
EJHaem. 2023 Oct 9;4(4):1042-1051. doi: 10.1002/jha2.796. eCollection 2023 Nov.
10
Criteria-Based Imaging and Response Evaluation of Lymphoma 20 Years After Cheson: What is New?Cheson标准发布20年后淋巴瘤的基于标准的影像学检查与疗效评估:有哪些新进展?
Rofo. 2020 Jul;192(7):657-668. doi: 10.1055/a-1091-8897. Epub 2020 Mar 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Semiquantitative PET Parameters Refine Prognosis in CAR T-Treated Lymphoma After 1 and 3 Months: A Prospective Single-Center Study.半定量PET参数改善CAR-T治疗淋巴瘤1个月和3个月后的预后:一项前瞻性单中心研究
J Nucl Med. 2025 Apr 17. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.125.269670.

本文引用的文献

1
Prognostic value of pre-infusion tumor growth rate for patients with lymphoma receiving chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy.输注前肿瘤生长率对接受嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞治疗的淋巴瘤患者的预后价值。
Cytotherapy. 2023 Sep;25(9):986-992. doi: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2023.03.007. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
2
Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell Therapy: Imaging Response Criteria and Relation to Progression-free and Overall Survival.嵌合抗原受体T细胞疗法:成像反应标准及其与无进展生存期和总生存期的关系。
Hemasphere. 2022 Sep 27;6(10):e781. doi: 10.1097/HS9.0000000000000781. eCollection 2022 Oct.
3
Lymphoma tumor burden before chimeric antigen receptor T-Cell treatment: RECIL vs. Lugano vs. metabolic tumor assessment.
嵌合抗原受体T细胞治疗前淋巴瘤肿瘤负荷:RECIL与卢加诺标准对比代谢性肿瘤评估
Front Oncol. 2022 Sep 8;12:974029. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.974029. eCollection 2022.
4
Measuring response in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer using PSMA PET/CT: comparison of RECIST 1.1, aPCWG3, aPERCIST, PPP, and RECIP 1.0 criteria.使用 PSMA PET/CT 测量转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌的反应:RECIST 1.1、aPCWG3、aPERCIST、PPP 和 RECIP 1.0 标准的比较。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022 Oct;49(12):4271-4281. doi: 10.1007/s00259-022-05882-x. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
5
The CAR-HEMATOTOX risk-stratifies patients for severe infections and disease progression after CD19 CAR-T in R/R LBCL.嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞(CAR-T)治疗后复发/难治性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤(R/R LBCL)患者的 CAR-HEMATOTOX 风险可预测严重感染和疾病进展。
J Immunother Cancer. 2022 May;10(5). doi: 10.1136/jitc-2021-004475.
6
Novel Framework for Treatment Response Evaluation Using PSMA PET/CT in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (RECIP 1.0): An International Multicenter Study.使用 PSMA PET/CT 评估转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌患者治疗反应的新框架(RECIP 1.0):一项国际多中心研究。
J Nucl Med. 2022 Nov;63(11):1651-1658. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.121.263072. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
7
Proposed New Dynamic Prognostic Index for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: International Metabolic Prognostic Index.国际代谢预后指数:用于弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤的新型动态预后指标。
J Clin Oncol. 2022 Jul 20;40(21):2352-2360. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.02063. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
8
Metabolic characteristics and prognostic differentiation of aggressive lymphoma using one-month post-CAR-T FDG PET/CT.应用 CAR-T 治疗后一个月的 FDG PET/CT 评估侵袭性淋巴瘤的代谢特征和预后差异。
J Hematol Oncol. 2022 Mar 26;15(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s13045-022-01256-w.
9
Molecular features encoded in the ctDNA reveal heterogeneity and predict outcome in high-risk aggressive B-cell lymphoma.循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)中编码的分子特征揭示了高危侵袭性B细胞淋巴瘤的异质性并可预测其预后。
Blood. 2022 Mar 24;139(12):1863-1877. doi: 10.1182/blood.2021012852.
10
Early FDG-PET response predicts CAR-T failure in large B-cell lymphoma.早期氟代脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描(FDG-PET)反应可预测大B细胞淋巴瘤的嵌合抗原受体T细胞(CAR-T)治疗失败。
Blood Adv. 2022 Jan 11;6(1):321-326. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021005807.