Bassi Angelo, Dorato Mauro, Ulbricht Hendrik
Department of Physics, University of Trieste, Strada Costiera 11, 34151 Trieste, Italy.
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Trieste Section, Via Valerio 2, 34127 Trieste, Italy.
Entropy (Basel). 2023 Apr 12;25(4):645. doi: 10.3390/e25040645.
In this paper, we review and connect the three essential conditions needed by the collapse model to achieve a complete and exact formulation, namely the theoretical, the experimental, and the ontological ones. These features correspond to the three parts of the paper. In any empirical science, the first two features are obviously connected but, as is well known, among the different formulations and interpretations of non-relativistic quantum mechanics, only collapse models, as the paper well illustrates with a richness of details, have experimental consequences. Finally, we show that a clarification of the ontological intimations of collapse models is needed for at least three reasons: (1) to respond to the indispensable task of answering the question 'what are collapse models (and in general any physical theory) about?'; (2) to achieve a deeper understanding of their different formulations; (3) to enlarge the panorama of possible readings of a theory, which historically has often played a fundamental heuristic role.
在本文中,我们回顾并关联了坍缩模型实现完整且精确表述所需的三个基本条件,即理论条件、实验条件和本体论条件。这些特征对应于本文的三个部分。在任何经验科学中,前两个特征显然是相互关联的,但众所周知,在非相对论量子力学的不同表述和解释中,正如本文以丰富的细节充分说明的那样,只有坍缩模型具有实验结果。最后,我们表明,至少出于三个原因需要澄清坍缩模型的本体论暗示:(1)回应回答“坍缩模型(以及一般任何物理理论)是关于什么的?”这个不可或缺的任务;(2)更深入地理解它们的不同表述;(3)拓展对一个理论可能解读的全景,而这在历史上常常发挥着基础性的启发作用。