Suppr超能文献

专有名词和普通名词:布洛卡失语症中的词类判断。

Proper and common nouns: form class judgments in Broca's aphasia.

作者信息

Grossman M, Carey S, Zurif E, Diller L

出版信息

Brain Lang. 1986 May;28(1):114-25. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(86)90095-7.

Abstract

Studies of agrammatic Broca's aphasics' comprehension of sentences containing articles have demonstrated profound deficits. It has not been clear whether the impairments are due to an inability to isolate the article in the stream of speech, or to difficulty in the construction and/or interpretation of various syntactic, semantic, or pragmatic levels of representation. This paper reports three experiments on Broca's aphasics' ability to distinguish between common nouns (e.g., "a rose") and proper nouns (e.g., "Rose"). This grammatical form class decision is signaled by the presence or absence of an article, and is represented at the lexical node level of linguistic analysis. The three experiments demonstrated that Broca's aphasics point to pictures representing classes of objects when asked to point to "the X" and point to pictures representing unique individuals when asked to point to "X". Thus, they were shown to be able to use the presence or absence of an article to determine lexical category. Their performance was especially accurate in an oral language context which was highly redundant and in a written language context where patients themselves could control the rate of information flow. They were quantitatively impaired, relative to controls, in a third study, which made higher information processing demands. Moreover, in this third study nonsense syllables preceding the noun which are phonologically similar to a known article were much more likely to evoke the misclassification of its noun as common than were phonologically distinct nonsense syllables. These data indicate that Broca's aphasics indeed have some difficulty isolating the article in the stream of speech. Nevertheless, detailed analyses of aphasics' performance revealed their ability to distinguish between common nouns and proper nouns even under these demanding conditions. Taken together, the three studies show that insofar as agrammatic patients are able to keep track of the presence or absence of articles, they can make a grammatical decision at the lexical node level of linguistic analysis. We conclude, then, that agrammatic Broca's aphasics are particularly impaired in the use of articles to construct and/or interpret phrasal constituents.

摘要

对语法缺失型布罗卡失语症患者理解包含冠词的句子的研究表明,他们存在严重缺陷。目前尚不清楚这些损伤是由于无法在言语流中分离出冠词,还是由于在构建和/或解释各种句法、语义或语用表征层面存在困难。本文报告了三项关于布罗卡失语症患者区分普通名词(如“一朵玫瑰”)和专有名词(如“罗斯”)能力的实验。这种语法形式类别的判定由冠词的有无来表示,并在语言分析的词汇节点层面体现。这三项实验表明,当被要求指向“the X”时,布罗卡失语症患者会指向代表物体类别的图片;当被要求指向“X”时,他们会指向代表独特个体的图片。因此,研究表明他们能够利用冠词的有无来确定词汇类别。在高度冗余的口语语境以及患者能够自行控制信息流速度的书面语语境中,他们的表现尤为准确。在第三项对信息处理要求更高的研究中,相对于对照组,他们在数量上存在损伤。此外,在这项第三项研究中,在名词之前出现的与已知冠词在语音上相似的无意义音节,比在语音上不同的无意义音节更有可能引发将其名词误分类为普通名词的情况。这些数据表明,布罗卡失语症患者在言语流中分离出冠词确实存在一些困难。然而,对失语症患者表现的详细分析表明,即使在这些苛刻条件下,他们仍有能力区分普通名词和专有名词。综合来看,这三项研究表明,就语法缺失型患者能够追踪冠词的有无而言,他们能够在语言分析的词汇节点层面做出语法判定。因此,我们得出结论,语法缺失型布罗卡失语症患者在使用冠词来构建和/或解释短语成分方面尤其受损。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验