• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开放注册期和计划选择。

Open enrollment periods and plan choices.

机构信息

Department of Economics and BAFFI-Carefin, Università Bocconi, Milan, Italy.

Analysis Group, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Health Econ. 2020 Jul;29(7):733-747. doi: 10.1002/hec.4014. Epub 2020 Feb 26.

DOI:10.1002/hec.4014
PMID:32100363
Abstract

Open enrollment periods are pervasively used in insurance markets to limit adverse selection risks resulting when enrollees can switch plans at will. We exploit a change in the open enrollment rules of Medicare Advantage to analyze how beneficiaries responded to the option of switching to a 5-star-rated plan at anytime, in a setting where insurers adjusted premiums and benefit design to counterbalance the increased selection risk. We present three findings: Within-year switches to 5-star plans increase by 7-16%; demand for 5-star plans across the years does not decline; and the enrollees who switch to a 5-star plan during the year are in better health status than those who do not switch.

摘要

参保人可随意转换医保计划,这种行为会导致逆向选择风险,保险市场普遍采用开放注册期来限制这种风险。本文利用联邦医疗保险优势计划开放注册规则的改变,分析了在保险公司调整保费和福利设计以抵消增加的选择风险的情况下,参保人选择随时转换为五星级计划的情况。我们提出了三个发现:当年转换为五星级计划的人数增加了 7-16%;多年来对五星级计划的需求并未下降;当年转换为五星级计划的参保人比未转换的参保人健康状况更好。

相似文献

1
Open enrollment periods and plan choices.开放注册期和计划选择。
Health Econ. 2020 Jul;29(7):733-747. doi: 10.1002/hec.4014. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
2
Plan Switching and Stickiness in Medicare Advantage: A Qualitative Interview With Medicare Advantage Beneficiaries.医疗保险优势计划中的转换和粘性:对医疗保险优势计划受益人的定性访谈。
Med Care Res Rev. 2021 Dec;78(6):693-702. doi: 10.1177/1077558720944284. Epub 2020 Aug 1.
3
Analysis of Drivers of Disenrollment and Plan Switching Among Medicare Advantage Beneficiaries.医疗保险优势计划参保人退保和计划转换的驱动因素分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Apr 1;179(4):524-532. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.7639.
4
The Roles of Cost and Quality Information in Medicare Advantage Plan Enrollment Decisions: an Observational Study.成本和质量信息在医疗保险优势计划参保决策中的作用:一项观察性研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Feb;31(2):234-241. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3467-3. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
5
Association of Health Insurance Literacy With Enrollment in Traditional Medicare, Medicare Advantage, and Plan Characteristics Within Medicare Advantage.健康保险素养与传统医疗保险、医疗保险优势计划和医疗保险优势计划内计划特征的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Feb 1;5(2):e2146792. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.46792.
6
Will choice-based reform work for Medicare? Evidence from the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program.基于选择的改革对医疗保险是否有效?来自联邦雇员健康福利计划的证据。
Health Serv Res. 2006 Oct;41(5):1741-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00580.x.
7
Insurers' response to selection risk: Evidence from Medicare enrollment reforms.保险公司对选择风险的反应:来自医疗保险登记改革的证据。
J Health Econ. 2017 Dec;56:383-396. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2017.02.007.
8
Impact of Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug Plan Star Ratings on Enrollment before and after Implementation of Quality-Related Bonus Payments in 2012.2012年与质量相关的奖金支付实施前后,医疗保险优势处方药计划星级评定对参保人数的影响。
PLoS One. 2016 May 5;11(5):e0154357. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154357. eCollection 2016.
9
Association between Medicare Advantage plan star ratings and enrollment.医疗保险优势计划星级评定与参保情况的关联
JAMA. 2013 Jan 16;309(3):267-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.173925.
10
Encouraging Medicare Advantage Enrollees to Switch to Higher Quality Plans: Assessing the Effectiveness of a "Nudge" Letter.鼓励医疗保险优势计划参保人转向更高质量的计划:评估一封“助推”信的有效性。
MDM Policy Pract. 2017 May 5;2(1):2381468317707206. doi: 10.1177/2381468317707206. eCollection 2017 Jan-Jun.

引用本文的文献

1
The Two-Margin Problem in Insurance Markets.保险市场中的双边问题。
Rev Econ Stat. 2023 Mar;105(2):237-257. doi: 10.1162/rest_a_01070. Epub 2021 Jul 9.