Suppr超能文献

抗线粒体抗体:试剂变量可能导致诊断错误。

Antimitochondrial antibodies: reagent variables may lead to diagnostic error.

作者信息

Winter S L, Kraft S C, Boyer J L

出版信息

Dig Dis Sci. 1979 Jan;24(1):15-20. doi: 10.1007/BF01297232.

Abstract

Laboratory-prepared and commercially obtained fluorescein-labeled rabbit antihuman IgG were compared in performing the antimitochondria antibody (AMA) assay. Identical results were obtained using either of the fluorescent antisera at protein concentrations of 1.5 mg/ml and 1:10 dilutions of patients' sera. Positive AMA tests with either antisera were observed in each of 7 patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC), 2 of 83 patients with miscellaneous hepatic diseases, and in 1 of 24 patients with extrahepatic biliary obstruction (EBO) of 2-24 weeks duration. However, when undiluted commercial fluorescent antiserum (15.8 mg protein/ml) was substituted in the assay, sera from 11 of 23 AMA-negative patients with EBO and 12 of 15 with miscellaneous liver diseases demonstrated an atypical fluorescence located primarily along the periphery of the rat renal tubules. Thus, if the conjugated antibody is not adjusted to an optimal protein concentration, this atypical fluorescence could be interpreted as a positive AMA test and lead to diagnostic error.

摘要

在进行抗线粒体抗体(AMA)检测时,对实验室制备的和市售的荧光素标记兔抗人IgG进行了比较。在蛋白质浓度为1.5mg/ml以及患者血清1:10稀释的情况下,使用任何一种荧光抗血清都能得到相同的结果。在7例原发性胆汁性肝硬化(PBC)患者、83例其他肝病患者中的2例以及24例肝外胆管梗阻(EBO)持续时间为2 - 24周的患者中的1例,使用任何一种抗血清检测AMA均呈阳性。然而,当在检测中用未稀释的市售荧光抗血清(15.8mg蛋白质/ml)替代时,23例AMA阴性的EBO患者中的11例以及15例其他肝病患者中的12例血清显示出主要沿大鼠肾小管周边分布的非典型荧光。因此,如果结合抗体未调整至最佳蛋白质浓度,这种非典型荧光可能会被解释为AMA检测阳性并导致诊断错误。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验