• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

女性、谦逊的知识分子和自由主义者写出的政治论点更具说服力。

Women, the intellectually humble, and liberals write more persuasive political arguments.

作者信息

Lees Jeffrey, Todd Haley, Barranti Maxwell

机构信息

Andlinger Center for Energy and the Environment, Princeton University, 86 Olden St, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA.

School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, 20 Prospect Ave, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA.

出版信息

PNAS Nexus. 2023 Apr 25;2(5):pgad143. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad143. eCollection 2023 May.

DOI:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad143
PMID:37197311
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10184441/
Abstract

If sincere attempts at political persuasion are central to the functioning of democracy, then what attributes of individuals make them more persuasive toward fellow citizens? To examine this, we asked 594 Democrats and Republicans to write politically persuasive arguments on any topic of their choice and then gave those arguments to a US representative sample of 3,131 to rate the persuasiveness, totaling 54,686 judgments. We consistently found that arguments written by women, liberals, the intellectually humble, and those low on party identification were rated as more persuasive. These patterns were robust to controls for the demographics and partisanship of judges and persuaders, the topics written about, argument length, and the emotional sentiments of the arguments. Women's superior persuasiveness was partially, but not fully, explained by the fact that their arguments were longer, of a higher grade level, and expressed less dominance than men's. Intergroup dynamics also affected persuasiveness, as arguments written for in-party members were more persuasive than the ones written for out-party members. These findings suggest that an individual's personal and psychological characteristics durably provide them with a persuasive advantage when they engage in sincere attempts at changing the hearts and minds of fellow citizens.

摘要

如果真诚的政治说服尝试是民主运作的核心,那么个人的哪些特质会使他们对同胞更具说服力呢?为了探究这一点,我们让594名民主党人和共和党人就他们选择的任何话题撰写具有政治说服力的论据,然后将这些论据交给3131名具有美国代表性的样本进行说服力评分,总计有54686次评判。我们一直发现,由女性、自由主义者、谦逊的知识分子以及党派认同感较低的人撰写的论据被评为更具说服力。这些模式在控制了评判者和说服者的人口统计学特征及党派性、所写话题、论据长度以及论据的情感倾向后依然稳健。女性更具说服力的部分原因在于她们的论据更长、语言水平更高且比男性的论据表现出更少的主导性,但这并不能完全解释这一现象。群体间动态也会影响说服力,因为为党内成员撰写的论据比为党外成员撰写的论据更具说服力。这些发现表明,当个人真诚地试图改变同胞的想法时,其个人和心理特征会持久地为他们提供一种说服优势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2167/10184441/92a6e3ae2896/pgad143f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2167/10184441/fdcc6a4f6b3e/pgad143f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2167/10184441/8982dab305cc/pgad143f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2167/10184441/a2eb4013b2fd/pgad143f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2167/10184441/92a6e3ae2896/pgad143f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2167/10184441/fdcc6a4f6b3e/pgad143f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2167/10184441/8982dab305cc/pgad143f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2167/10184441/a2eb4013b2fd/pgad143f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2167/10184441/92a6e3ae2896/pgad143f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Women, the intellectually humble, and liberals write more persuasive political arguments.女性、谦逊的知识分子和自由主义者写出的政治论点更具说服力。
PNAS Nexus. 2023 Apr 25;2(5):pgad143. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad143. eCollection 2023 May.
2
Correction to: Women, the intellectually humble, and liberals write more persuasive political arguments.对《女性、谦逊的知识分子与自由主义者写出更具说服力的政治论点》的勘误
PNAS Nexus. 2023 Aug 22;2(8):pgad272. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad272. eCollection 2023 Aug.
3
The paradox of argument strength: how weak arguments undermine the persuasive effects of strong arguments.论证强度的悖论:弱论证如何削弱强论证的说服效果。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 27;14(1):22244. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-73348-1.
4
Political Ideology, Trust, and Cooperation: In-group Favoritism among Republicans Democrats during a US National Election.政治意识形态、信任与合作:美国全国选举期间共和党人和民主党人之间的内群体偏袒
J Conflict Resolut. 2018 Apr;62(4):797-818. doi: 10.1177/0022002716658694. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
5
Empathic Conservatives and Moralizing Liberals: Political Intergroup Empathy Varies by Political Ideology and Is Explained by Moral Judgment.具有同理心的保守派和爱说教的自由派:政治群体间的同理心因政治意识形态而异,并由道德判断来解释。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2025 May;51(5):678-700. doi: 10.1177/01461672231198001. Epub 2023 Sep 15.
6
Constituents' Inferences of Local Governments' Goals and the Relationship Between Political Party and Belief in COVID-19 Misinformation: Cross-sectional Survey of Twitter Followers of State Public Health Departments.地方政府目标的选民推断以及政党与新冠疫情错误信息中的信念之间的关系:对州公共卫生部门推特关注者的横断面调查
JMIR Infodemiology. 2022 Feb 10;2(1):e29246. doi: 10.2196/29246. eCollection 2022 Jan-Jun.
7
The Intersection of Persuasive System Design and Personalization in Mobile Health: Statistical Evaluation.移动健康中的说服系统设计与个性化交叉:统计评估。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Sep 14;10(9):e40576. doi: 10.2196/40576.
8
The Multiple-Matching Perspective on Value Versus Identity: Investigating How Political Ideology and Party Identity Contribute to Citizens' Support for Political Candidates.价值与身份认同的多重匹配视角:探究政治意识形态和党派身份认同如何影响公民对政治候选人的支持。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2024 Jan;50(1):58-77. doi: 10.1177/01461672221121381. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
9
Effects of intellectual humility in the context of affective polarization: Approaching and avoiding others in controversial political discussions.情感极化背景下智识谦逊的影响:在有争议的政治讨论中接近和回避他人。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2024 May 13. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000462.
10
From gulf to bridge: when do moral arguments facilitate political influence?从鸿沟到桥梁:道德论证何时能促进政治影响力?
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2015 Dec;41(12):1665-81. doi: 10.1177/0146167215607842. Epub 2015 Oct 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Cognitive-motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts.社会交际背景下政治两极分化的认知动机机制。
Nat Rev Psychol. 2022;1(10):560-576. doi: 10.1038/s44159-022-00093-5. Epub 2022 Aug 1.
2
Personal experiences bridge moral and political divides better than facts.个人经历比事实更能弥合道德和政治分歧。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Feb 9;118(6). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2008389118.
3
Linear mixed-effects models and the analysis of nonindependent data: A unified framework to analyze categorical and continuous independent variables that vary within-subjects and/or within-items.
线性混合效应模型和非独立数据的分析:一种统一的框架,用于分析在个体内和/或个体内变化的分类和连续自变量。
Psychol Methods. 2018 Sep;23(3):389-411. doi: 10.1037/met0000159. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
4
Cognitive and Interpersonal Features of Intellectual Humility.认知与人际特征:智力谦逊
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2017 Jun;43(6):793-813. doi: 10.1177/0146167217697695. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
5
Overcorrection for Social-Categorization Information Moderates Impact Bias in Affective Forecasting.社会分类信息的过度矫正调节了情感预测中的影响偏差。
Psychol Sci. 2016 Oct;27(10):1340-1351. doi: 10.1177/0956797616660292. Epub 2016 Aug 20.
6
Durably reducing transphobia: A field experiment on door-to-door canvassing.持久减少跨性别恐惧症:挨家挨户上门宣传的现场实验。
Science. 2016 Apr 8;352(6282):220-4. doi: 10.1126/science.aad9713.
7
The 12 item Social and Economic Conservatism Scale (SECS).十二项社会与经济保守主义量表(SECS)。
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 11;8(12):e82131. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082131. eCollection 2013.
8
Self-generated persuasion: effects of the target and direction of arguments.自我生成的说服:论点的目标和方向的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 May;102(5):925-40. doi: 10.1037/a0027231. Epub 2012 Feb 20.