Department of Orthopedic Surgery at Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation at Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Am J Sports Med. 2023 Jul;51(8):2133-2140. doi: 10.1177/03635465231170394. Epub 2023 May 18.
Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been used extensively in clinical practice to treat patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA). Leukocyte-poor PRP (LP-PRP) has been clinically preferred over leukocyte-rich PRP (LR-PRP); however, it is unclear which cytokine mediators of pain and inflammation are present in LR-PRP and LP-PRP from patients with mild to moderate knee OA in order to rationalize a specific formulation.
LP-PRP would be predominantly anti-inflammatory and have reduced nociceptive pain mediators compared with LR-PRP from the same individual with mild to moderate knee OA.
Controlled laboratory study.
A total of 24 unique samples of PRP were prepared in order to assess 48 samples of LR-PRP and LP-PRP taken from 12 patients (6 male and 6 female) with symptomatic knee OA of Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2 to 3. Patients underwent blood collection for LR-PRP and LP-PRP preparation through a double-spin protocol to obtain baseline whole blood, platelet concentration, and white blood cell subtypes. LR-PRP and LP-PRP from the same patient were produced at the same time and underwent a comprehensive panel through Luminex (multicytokine profiling) to assess key mediators of inflammation: interleukin 1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra), interleukin 4, 6, 8, and 10 (IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10), IL-1β, tissue necrosis factor α (TNF-α), and matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9). To assess mediators of nociceptive pain, nerve growth factor (NGF) and tartrate resistant acid phosphatase 5 (TRAP5) were also assessed.
LR-PRP from patients with mild to moderate knee OA expressed significantly more IL-1Ra, IL-4, IL-8, and MMP-9 compared with LP-PRP formulations from the same patients. No significant differences were found between LR-PRP and LP-PRP in mediators of nociceptive pain-namely, NGF and TRAP5. Other mediators including TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-10 were also found to have no significant expression differences between LR-PRP and LP-PRP.
LR-PRP expressed significantly more IL-1Ra, IL-4, and IL-8, suggesting that LR-PRP may be more anti-inflammatory than LP-PRP. MMP-9 was expressed in higher concentrations in LR-PRP, suggesting that LR-PRP may be more chondrotoxic than LP-PRP.
LR-PRP was found to have a robust expression of anti-inflammatory mediators compared with LP-PRP and may be beneficial to patients with long-term knee OA where chronic low-grade inflammation is present. Mechanistic clinical trials are needed to elucidate the key mediators in both LR-PRP and LP-PRP to assess their effect on long-term progression of knee OA.
富血小板血浆(PRP)已广泛应用于临床,用于治疗有症状的膝骨关节炎(OA)患者。白细胞减少富血小板血浆(LR-PRP)在临床上优于白细胞减少贫血小板血浆(LP-PRP);然而,为了使制剂合理化,尚不清楚轻度至中度膝 OA 患者的 LR-PRP 和 LP-PRP 中存在哪些细胞因子介导的疼痛和炎症。
与来自同一轻度至中度膝 OA 患者的 LP-PRP 相比,LR-PRP 主要具有抗炎作用,并且具有减少的伤害感受性疼痛介质。
对照实验室研究。
为了评估来自 12 名(6 名男性和 6 名女性)有症状的膝 OA 患者的 48 份 LR-PRP 和 LP-PRP,共制备了 24 份 PRP 的独特样本(Kellgren-Lawrence 分级 2-3)。通过双旋 protocol 对患者进行血液采集,以制备 LR-PRP 和 LP-PRP,以获得基线全血、血小板浓度和白细胞亚型。同一患者的 LR-PRP 和 LP-PRP 同时产生,并通过 Luminex(多细胞因子分析)进行全面分析,以评估炎症的关键介质:白细胞介素 1 受体拮抗剂(IL-1Ra)、白细胞介素 4、6、8 和 10(IL-4、IL-6、IL-8 和 IL-10)、IL-1β、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)和基质金属蛋白酶 9(MMP-9)。为了评估伤害感受性疼痛的介质,还评估了神经生长因子(NGF)和抗酒石酸酸性磷酸酶 5(TRAP5)。
与来自同一患者的 LP-PRP 制剂相比,轻度至中度膝 OA 患者的 LR-PRP 表达的 IL-1Ra、IL-4 和 IL-8 明显更多。在伤害感受性疼痛介质-NGF 和 TRAP5 方面,LR-PRP 和 LP-PRP 之间未发现显着差异。还发现其他介质,包括 TNF-α、IL-1β、IL-6 和 IL-10,LR-PRP 和 LP-PRP 之间的表达差异也无统计学意义。
LR-PRP 表达的 IL-1Ra、IL-4 和 IL-8 明显更多,表明 LR-PRP 可能比 LP-PRP 更具抗炎作用。LR-PRP 中 MMP-9 的表达浓度更高,表明 LR-PRP 可能比 LP-PRP 更具软骨毒性。
与 LP-PRP 相比,LR-PRP 中发现具有强大的抗炎介质表达,可能对长期存在慢性低度炎症的膝 OA 患者有益。需要进行机制临床试验,以阐明 LR-PRP 和 LP-PRP 中的关键介质,以评估它们对膝 OA 长期进展的影响。