• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[墨西哥2型糖尿病治疗的成本效益]

[Cost-effectiveness of treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in México].

作者信息

Pérez-Lozano Diana L, Camarillo-Nava Víctor Manuel, Juárez-Zepeda Tarsila Elizabeth, Andrade-Pineda José Elpidio, Pérez-López Danae, Reyes-Pacheco Jorge Armando, Lucho-Gutiérrez Zuley Margarita, Carmona-Aparicio Liliana

机构信息

Universidad Autónoma de México, Programa de Maestría y Doctorado en Ciencias Médicas y Odontológicas y de la Salud, Unidad de posgrado. Ciudad de México, México.

Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Órgano de Operación Administrativa Desconcentrada Norte, Coordinación Auxiliar Médica de Investigación en Salud. Ciudad de México, México.

出版信息

Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2023 Mar 1;61(2):172-180.

PMID:37201213
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10396055/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM2) is a public health and socioeconomic problem, generating direct medical costs for its treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the cost-effectiveness of monotherapy and bitherapy treatments in patients with DM2.

METHODS

Cost-effectiveness, observational, ambispective, cross-sectional and analytical analysis of files in a first level medical unit. The data in the cost matrix was executed with the Office Excel 2010 program; the most prescribed drug was identified and compared with monotherapy and bitherapy.

RESULTS

The annual direct medical costs of the total population were drug cost $118,561.70MN, hospitalization cost $243,756.00MN, consultation cost $327,414.00MN and clinical trial cost $2416.79MN, obtaining an annual total of $692,148.58MN. metformin was the most indicated in monotherapy (88.4%) and as standard therapy it has higher cost-effectiveness compared to glibenclamide. In bitherapy it was metformin/glibenclamide (35.7%) versus the therapeutics of metformin/NPH insulin, metformin/insulin glargine and metformin/dapagliflozin, which had a better cost-effective result, with an incremental cost effectiveness of -$1,128,428.50MN, -$34,365.00 MN, -$119,848.97MN respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Metformin presented a better cost-effectiveness ratio in monotherapy, while in bitherapy it was the metformin/NPH insulin association.

摘要

背景

2型糖尿病(DM2)是一个公共卫生和社会经济问题,其治疗会产生直接医疗费用。

目的

分析DM2患者单药治疗和联合治疗的成本效益。

方法

对一级医疗单位的档案进行成本效益、观察性、双向性、横断面和分析性分析。成本矩阵中的数据使用Office Excel 2010程序执行;确定最常用药物并与单药治疗和联合治疗进行比较。

结果

总人口的年度直接医疗费用为药品费用118,561.70百万比索、住院费用243,756.00百万比索、会诊费用327,414.00百万比索和临床试验费用2416.79百万比索,年度总计692,148.58百万比索。二甲双胍在单药治疗中使用最多(88.4%),作为标准治疗,与格列本脲相比具有更高的成本效益。在联合治疗中,二甲双胍/格列本脲(35.7%)与二甲双胍/中效胰岛素、二甲双胍/甘精胰岛素和二甲双胍/达格列净的联合治疗相比,成本效益更好,增量成本效益分别为-1,128,428.50百万比索、-34,365.00百万比索、-119,848.97百万比索。

结论

二甲双胍在单药治疗中呈现出更好的成本效益比,而在联合治疗中则是二甲双胍/中效胰岛素联合。

相似文献

1
[Cost-effectiveness of treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in México].[墨西哥2型糖尿病治疗的成本效益]
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2023 Mar 1;61(2):172-180.
2
Repaglinide : a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in type 2 diabetes mellitus.瑞格列奈:对其在2型糖尿病治疗中应用的药物经济学综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22(6):389-411. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200422060-00005.
3
Cost-effectiveness analysis of dapagliflozin treatment versus metformin treatment in Chinese population with type 2 diabetes.达格列净与二甲双胍治疗中国2型糖尿病患者的成本效益分析
J Med Econ. 2019 Apr;22(4):336-343. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1570220. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
4
Cost-effectiveness of intensification with sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes on metformin and sitagliptin vs direct intensification with insulin in the United Kingdom.在英国,对于正在服用二甲双胍和西他列汀的 2 型糖尿病患者,与直接强化胰岛素相比,使用钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂强化治疗的成本效益。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Apr;21(4):1010-1017. doi: 10.1111/dom.13618. Epub 2019 Jan 20.
5
Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of insulin glargine compared with NPH insulin based on a 10-year simulation of long-term complications with the Diabetes Mellitus Model in patients with type 2 diabetes in Switzerland.基于瑞士2型糖尿病患者长期并发症的10年模拟,利用糖尿病模型比较甘精胰岛素与中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素的成本效益和成本效用。
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Apr;45(4):203-20. doi: 10.5414/cpp45203.
6
Cost-effectiveness of insulin glargine versus NPH insulin for the treatment of Type 2 diabetes mellitus, modeling the interaction between hypoglycemia and glycemic control in Switzerland.甘精胰岛素与中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素治疗2型糖尿病的成本效益:瑞士低血糖与血糖控制相互作用的模型研究
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Mar;49(3):217-30. doi: 10.5414/cpp49217.
7
Newer agents for blood glucose control in type 2 diabetes: systematic review and economic evaluation.新型 2 型糖尿病血糖控制药物:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 Jul;14(36):1-248. doi: 10.3310/hta14360.
8
The cost-effectiveness of dapagliflozin versus sulfonylurea as an add-on to metformin in the treatment of Type 2 diabetes mellitus.达格列净与磺脲类药物作为二甲双胍治疗2型糖尿病附加用药的成本效益分析
Diabet Med. 2015 Jul;32(7):890-8. doi: 10.1111/dme.12772. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
9
[POET2 registry: Comparison of annual direct medical costs of treating type 2 diabetes after addition of insulin NPH or insulin glargine to oral antidiabetic therapy in the Czech Republic].[POET2注册研究:在捷克共和国,口服抗糖尿病治疗基础上加用中性胰岛素或甘精胰岛素后2型糖尿病治疗的年度直接医疗费用比较]
Vnitr Lek. 2015 Jan;61(1):24-32.
10
Addition of insulin glargine or NPH insulin to metformin monotherapy in poorly controlled type 2 diabetic patients decreases IGF-I bioactivity similarly.在血糖控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者中,联合应用甘精胰岛素或 NPH 胰岛素与二甲双胍单药治疗可使 IGF-I 生物活性同样降低。
Diabetologia. 2012 Apr;55(4):1186-94. doi: 10.1007/s00125-011-2435-7. Epub 2012 Jan 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of Physical Exercise on Indicators of Metabolic Syndrome in Adults: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials.体育锻炼对成人代谢综合征指标的有效性:一项对临床试验进行荟萃分析的系统评价
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2025 Jun 27;10(3):244. doi: 10.3390/jfmk10030244.
2
Comprehensive study of associated factors with Type 2 Diabetes in Mexico: protocol.墨西哥2型糖尿病相关因素的综合研究:方案
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2025 Jul 1;63(4):e6386. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.15644323.
3
Estimation of the Burden of Ischemic Heart Disease in the Tabasco Population, Mexico, 2013-2021.

本文引用的文献

1
[Population profiles associated with attendanceat preventive services to screeningtests. Ensanut 2018-19].[与接受预防性筛查服务相关的人群概况。2018 - 19年全国健康与营养调查(Ensamut)]
Salud Publica Mex. 2020 Nov-Dec;62(6):754-766. doi: 10.21149/11556.
2
Cost-effectiveness analysis of a multidisciplinary health-care model for patients with type-2 diabetes implemented in the public sector in Mexico: A quasi-experimental, retrospective evaluation.墨西哥公共部门实施的 2 型糖尿病多学科保健模式的成本效益分析:准实验、回顾性评估。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2020 Sep;167:108336. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108336. Epub 2020 Aug 2.
3
2013 - 2021年墨西哥塔巴斯科州人群缺血性心脏病负担的评估
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Mar 13;22(3):423. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22030423.
4
[Macular edema in retinal fundus images by a computational algorithm].[通过计算算法检测视网膜眼底图像中的黄斑水肿]
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2024 Mar 4;62(2):1-7. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10711610.
Abridged for Primary Care Providers.
为初级保健提供者缩写。
Clin Diabetes. 2020 Jan;38(1):10-38. doi: 10.2337/cd20-as01.
4
Introducing Kolmogorov-Smirnov Tests under Uncertainty: An Application to Radioactive Data.不确定性条件下的柯尔莫哥洛夫-斯米尔诺夫检验:放射性数据的应用
ACS Omega. 2019 Dec 31;5(1):914-917. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.9b03940. eCollection 2020 Jan 14.
5
Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes, 2018. A Consensus Report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD).2018 年美国糖尿病协会(ADA)和欧洲糖尿病研究协会(EASD)共识报告:2 型糖尿病患者高血糖管理。
Diabetes Care. 2018 Dec;41(12):2669-2701. doi: 10.2337/dci18-0033. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
6
Cost analysis of type 2 diabetes mellitus treatment in economically developed countries.经济发达国家2型糖尿病治疗的成本分析。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2019 Feb;19(1):5-14. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2018.1513790. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
7
Using Cost-Effectiveness Analysis to Address Health Equity Concerns.运用成本效益分析解决健康公平问题。
Value Health. 2017 Feb;20(2):206-212. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.11.027.
8
[Direct service costs of diabetes mellitus hospitalisations in the Mexican Institute of Social Security].[墨西哥社会保障局糖尿病住院治疗的直接服务成本]
Gac Sanit. 2018 May-Jun;32(3):209-215. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2016.06.015. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
9
Societal costs of diabetes mellitus in Denmark.丹麦糖尿病的社会成本。
Diabet Med. 2016 Jul;33(7):877-85. doi: 10.1111/dme.12965. Epub 2015 Oct 29.
10
Triggering factors of primary care costs in the years following type 2 diabetes diagnosis in Mexico.墨西哥 2 型糖尿病诊断后数年初级保健费用的触发因素。
Arch Med Res. 2014 Jul;45(5):400-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2014.05.002. Epub 2014 May 11.