• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大流行相关的全球对科学界态度的变化如何塑造“后大流行”时期的环境观点。

How pandemic-related changes in global attitudes toward the scientific community shape "post-pandemic" environmental opinion.

机构信息

Boston University School of Public Health, USA.

Union College, USA.

出版信息

Public Underst Sci. 2023 Oct;32(7):907-925. doi: 10.1177/09636625231167735. Epub 2023 May 19.

DOI:10.1177/09636625231167735
PMID:37204071
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10200811/
Abstract

Low public concern about anthropogenic climate change (ACC)-due in part to distrust in the scientific community-may decrease demand for policies aimed at mitigating its deleterious effects. Encouragingly, though, recent research finds that experiences with the COVID-19 pandemic has elevated trust in scientific expertise worldwide. We explore the possibility that positive attitudes toward the medical community are "spilling over" to increase ACC acceptance via globally representative survey data from 107 countries ( = 119,088) conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic. We show that trust in medical experts' handling of the COVID-19 pandemic is associated with increased ACC acceptance, worldwide. Problematically, though, we also show that the effects of trust in medical professionals is strongest in countries experiencing the most positive change in attitudes toward the scientific community, which tend to be disproportionately wealthy, and less likely to bear the unequal effects of climate change.

摘要

公众对人为气候变化(ACC)的关注度较低-部分原因是对科学界的不信任-可能会降低对旨在减轻其有害影响的政策的需求。不过,令人鼓舞的是,最近的研究发现,应对 COVID-19 大流行的经验提高了全球对科学专业知识的信任。我们通过在 COVID-19 大流行期间在 107 个国家( = 119,088)进行的全球代表性调查数据,探讨了对医学界的积极态度是否“溢出”,从而通过增加 ACC 接受度。我们表明,全球范围内,对医学专家处理 COVID-19 大流行的信任与对 ACC 的接受度增加有关。不过,问题在于,我们还表明,对医疗专业人员的信任的影响在对科学界的态度发生最积极变化的国家中最强,这些国家往往更加富裕,而且不太可能承受气候变化的不平等影响。

相似文献

1
How pandemic-related changes in global attitudes toward the scientific community shape "post-pandemic" environmental opinion.大流行相关的全球对科学界态度的变化如何塑造“后大流行”时期的环境观点。
Public Underst Sci. 2023 Oct;32(7):907-925. doi: 10.1177/09636625231167735. Epub 2023 May 19.
2
How to distinguish climate sceptics, antivaxxers, and persistent sceptics: Evidence from a multi-country survey of public attitudes.如何区分气候怀疑论者、反疫苗接种者和顽固怀疑论者:来自多国公众态度调查的证据。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 2;19(10):e0310325. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310325. eCollection 2024.
3
Public Perception of COVID-19 Vaccination in Italy: The Role of Trust and Experts' Communication.公众对意大利 COVID-19 疫苗接种的看法:信任和专家沟通的作用。
Int J Public Health. 2022 Mar 16;67:1604222. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2022.1604222. eCollection 2022.
4
Regaining Trust in Public Health and Biomedical Science following Covid: The Role of Scientists.新冠疫情后恢复公众对公共卫生和生物医学科学的信任:科学家的作用。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2023 Sep;53 Suppl 2:S105-S109. doi: 10.1002/hast.1531.
5
Belief in public efficacy, trust, and attitudes toward modern genetic science.对公众效能的信念、信任以及对现代基因科学的态度。
Risk Anal. 2007 Aug;27(4):921-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00932.x.
6
Assessing changes in US public trust in science amid the COVID-19 pandemic.评估 COVID-19 大流行期间美国公众对科学的信任变化。
Public Health. 2020 Jun;183:122-125. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.05.004. Epub 2020 May 13.
7
A science confidence gap: Education, trust in scientific methods, and trust in scientific institutions in the United States, 2014.科学信任差距:2014 年美国的科学教育、对科学方法的信任和对科学机构的信任。
Public Underst Sci. 2017 Aug;26(6):704-720. doi: 10.1177/0963662515617367. Epub 2015 Dec 6.
8
Science in the Public Mind: .公众心目中的科学:...
Perspect Biol Med. 2023;66(3):468-477. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2023.a902039.
9
Acceptance of Public Health Measures During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study of the Swiss Population's Beliefs, Attitudes, Trust, and Information-Seeking Behavior.接受公共卫生措施在 COVID-19 大流行期间:瑞士人口的信仰、态度、信任和信息寻求行为的横断面研究。
Int J Public Health. 2023 Jun 20;68:1605982. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2023.1605982. eCollection 2023.
10
Political endorsement by Nature and trust in scientific expertise during COVID-19.《COVID-19 期间,自然代言和对科学专业知识的信任》。
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 May;7(5):696-706. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01537-5. Epub 2023 Mar 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Does declining income caused by the COVID-19 pandemic affect Chinese individuals' future risky decision-making and intertemporal choices? A construal level perspective.由新冠疫情导致的收入下降会影响中国个人未来的风险决策和跨期选择吗?一个解释水平视角。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jun 20;16:1584337. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1584337. eCollection 2025.
2
From words to pixels: The Infectious Diseases in Motion (IDIM) and VACCELERATE experience for fast and accessible science audiovisual communication.从文字到像素:传染病动态(IDIM)和VACCELERATE在快速且便捷的科学视听传播方面的经验。
One Health. 2023 Nov 7;17:100648. doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2023.100648. eCollection 2023 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Politicization and Polarization in COVID-19 News Coverage.新冠疫情新闻报道中的政治化与两极分化。
Sci Commun. 2020 Oct;42(5):679-697. doi: 10.1177/1075547020950735.
2
Is partisan conflict over COVID-19 vaccination eroding support for childhood vaccine mandates?围绕新冠疫苗接种的党派冲突是否正在削弱对儿童疫苗强制令的支持?
NPJ Vaccines. 2023 Feb 2;8(1):5. doi: 10.1038/s41541-023-00611-3.
3
Trust in scientists in times of pandemic: Panel evidence from 12 countries.大流行时期对科学家的信任:来自 12 个国家的小组证据。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Oct 5;118(40). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2108576118.
4
Anti-intellectualism and the mass public's response to the COVID-19 pandemic.反智主义与大众对新冠疫情的反应。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Jun;5(6):706-715. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01112-w. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
5
Partisanship, health behavior, and policy attitudes in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. partisanship, health behavior, and policy attitudes in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 7;16(4):e0249596. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249596. eCollection 2021.
6
Correlates and disparities of intention to vaccinate against COVID-19.新冠疫苗接种意愿的相关因素与差异
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Mar;272:113638. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113638. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
7
Elusive consensus: Polarization in elite communication on the COVID-19 pandemic. elusive consensus: 极化的精英沟通在新冠大流行中
Sci Adv. 2020 Jul 10;6(28):eabc2717. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abc2717. eCollection 2020 Jul.
8
Vaccine hesitancy in low- and middle-income countries: potential implications for the COVID-19 response.低收入和中等收入国家的疫苗犹豫:对新冠疫情应对措施的潜在影响
Arch Dis Child. 2021 Feb;106(2):113-114. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2020-318988. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
9
Depression and Anxiety in Hong Kong during COVID-19.新冠疫情下香港的抑郁和焦虑状况。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 25;17(10):3740. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17103740.
10
Levels and predictors of anxiety, depression and health anxiety during COVID-19 pandemic in Turkish society: The importance of gender.新冠疫情期间土耳其社会的焦虑、抑郁和健康焦虑水平及其预测因素:性别重要性。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2020 Aug;66(5):504-511. doi: 10.1177/0020764020927051. Epub 2020 May 8.