• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

作为一种器官分配框架的连续分布。

Continuous distribution as an organ allocation framework.

作者信息

Kasiske Bertram L, Pyke Joshua, Snyder Jon J

机构信息

Hennepin County Medical Center.

Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Chronic Disease Research Group, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute.

出版信息

Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2020 Apr;25(2):115-121. doi: 10.1097/MOT.0000000000000733.

DOI:10.1097/MOT.0000000000000733
PMID:32073498
Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) supports the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) efforts to better align liver allocation with the Final Rule. Here, we review recent literature related to removing place of residence or listing from organ allocation policy and describe how SRTR may help advance the OPTN policy development process.

RECENT FINDINGS

In December 2018, the OPTN Board of Directors endorsed the recommendation from OPTN's ad hoc Committee on Geography to develop organ-allocation policies that do not rely on geographic boundaries, called 'continuous distribution.' Many objections to wider organ distribution stem from efforts to address inequities in allocation for populations within geographic regions rather than for individual patients. A continuous distribution system could equitably address the needs of individual patients, merging ethical-medical urgency with geographic feasibility.

SUMMARY

The effort to remove geographic boundaries from organ distribution and allocation has been controversial. An integrated continuous distribution system may help focus the debate on priorities that matter most to patients.

摘要

综述目的

移植受者科学注册系统(SRTR)支持器官获取与移植网络(OPTN)为使肝脏分配更好地符合最终规则所做的努力。在此,我们回顾近期与从器官分配政策中去除居住地或登记信息相关的文献,并描述SRTR如何助力推进OPTN的政策制定进程。

最新发现

2018年12月,OPTN董事会认可了OPTN地理特设委员会的建议,即制定不依赖地理边界的器官分配政策,称为“连续分配”。许多对更广泛器官分配的反对意见源于为解决地理区域内人群而非个体患者分配不平等问题所做的努力。连续分配系统可以公平地满足个体患者的需求,将伦理 - 医学紧迫性与地理可行性相结合。

总结

从器官分配中去除地理边界的努力一直存在争议。一个综合的连续分配系统可能有助于将辩论聚焦于对患者最重要的优先事项上。

相似文献

1
Continuous distribution as an organ allocation framework.作为一种器官分配框架的连续分布。
Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2020 Apr;25(2):115-121. doi: 10.1097/MOT.0000000000000733.
2
Organ distribution without geographic boundaries: A possible framework for organ allocation.打破地域限制的器官分配:器官分配的一种可能框架。
Am J Transplant. 2018 Nov;18(11):2635-2640. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15115. Epub 2018 Sep 29.
3
Geographic disparities in liver supply/demand ratio within fixed-distance and fixed-population circles.固定距离和固定人口圈内肝源供需比的地域差异。
Am J Transplant. 2019 Jul;19(7):2044-2052. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15297. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
4
Restructuring the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network contract to achieve policy coherence and infrastructure excellence.重构器官获取与移植网络合同,以实现政策一致性和基础设施卓越性。
Am J Transplant. 2019 Jun;19(6):1622-1627. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15161. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
5
New paradigms for organ allocation and distribution in liver transplantation.肝移植中器官分配与分发的新范式
Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2018 May;34(3):123-131. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0000000000000434.
6
The Current State of Liver Transplantation in the United States: Perspective From American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS) Scientific Studies Committee and Endorsed by ASTS Council.美国肝移植的现状:美国移植外科学会(ASTS)科学研究委员会的观点,并得到 ASTS 理事会的认可。
Am J Transplant. 2016 Nov;16(11):3093-3104. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14017. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
7
An opposing view to United States liver allocation problems with broader sharing.一种反对美国肝脏分配问题采用更广泛共享方式的观点。
Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2020 Apr;25(2):110-114. doi: 10.1097/MOT.0000000000000739.
8
Improving Liver Allocation Using Optimized Neighborhoods.利用优化邻域改善肝脏分配
Transplantation. 2017 Feb;101(2):350-359. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001505.
9
Removing geographic boundaries from liver allocation: A method for designing continuous distribution scores.消除肝脏分配的地域界限:一种设计连续分配分数的方法。
Clin Transplant. 2023 Sep;37(9):e15017. doi: 10.1111/ctr.15017. Epub 2023 May 19.
10
Time Is a Precious Commodity: 2018 OPTN Policy Change and the Potential to Lower Heart Transplant Waitlist Time in the Sickest Patients.时间是宝贵的资源:2018 年 OPTN 政策的改变与降低最病危患者心脏移植候补名单时间的潜力。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2019 Jun 20;21(7):67. doi: 10.1007/s11886-019-1150-8.

引用本文的文献

1
An In-depth overview of artificial intelligence (AI) tool utilization across diverse phases of organ transplantation.人工智能(AI)工具在器官移植不同阶段的应用深度概述。
J Transl Med. 2025 Jun 18;23(1):678. doi: 10.1186/s12967-025-06488-1.
2
Automated abdominal CT imaging biomarkers and clinical frailty measures associated with postoperative deceased-donor liver transplant outcomes.与术后尸体供肝移植结局相关的自动化腹部CT成像生物标志物和临床衰弱指标
Eur Radiol. 2025 Mar 23. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11523-2.
3
National Organ Procurement and Transplant Network Heart Allocation Policy: 6 Years Later.
国家器官获取与移植网络心脏分配政策:6年后
Circ Heart Fail. 2025 Jun;18(6):e011631. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.124.011631. Epub 2025 Mar 21.
4
Using Unsupervised Clustering to Characterize Phenotypes Among Older Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Cohort Study.使用无监督聚类法描述老年肾移植受者的表型:一项队列研究。
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2025 Mar 14;12:20543581251322576. doi: 10.1177/20543581251322576. eCollection 2025.
5
Reduced short-term survival following liver transplant in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure: Reevaluating OPTN data.急性慢性肝衰竭患者肝移植后短期生存率降低:重新评估器官获取与移植网络(OPTN)数据。
Hepatol Commun. 2025 Feb 19;9(3). doi: 10.1097/HC9.0000000000000651. eCollection 2025 Mar 1.
6
Artificial Intelligence in Nephrology: Clinical Applications and Challenges.肾脏病学中的人工智能:临床应用与挑战
Kidney Med. 2024 Nov 12;7(1):100927. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100927. eCollection 2025 Jan.
7
Inconsistent values and algorithmic fairness: a review of organ allocation priority systems in the United States.不一致的值和算法公平性:美国器官分配优先级系统综述。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Oct 17;25(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01116-x.
8
Targeted Broader Sharing for Liver Continuous Distribution.肝脏持续分配的定向更广泛共享
Transplantation. 2025 Jan 1;109(1):e36-e44. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000005184. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
9
Common definitions and variables are needed for the United States to join the conversation on acute-on-chronic liver failure.美国需要共同定义和变量,以便参与到慢性加急性肝衰竭的讨论中。
Am J Transplant. 2024 Oct;24(10):1755-1760. doi: 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.06.021. Epub 2024 Jul 6.
10
Calibration of Priority Points for Sensitization Status of Kidney Transplant Candidates in the United States.美国肾移植候选者致敏状态优先级评分的校准。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2024 Jun 1;19(6):767-777. doi: 10.2215/CJN.0000000000000449. Epub 2024 Mar 21.