• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评价新斯的明或琥珀酰明胶用于罗库溴铵维持和逆转阻滞的管理方案。

Evaluation of a Protocol for the Management of Maintenance and Reversal of Rocuronium Block Using Neostigmine or Sugammadex.

机构信息

From the Departments of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine.

Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 2023 Jun 1;136(6):1143-1153. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006510. Epub 2023 May 19.

DOI:10.1213/ANE.0000000000006510
PMID:37205804
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade (PRNB) is defined as an adductor pollicis train-of-four ratio (TOFR) <0.9. It is a common postoperative complication when nondepolarizing muscle relaxants are either not reversed or reversed with neostigmine. PRNB has been reported in 25% to 58% of patients who receive intermediate-acting nondepolarizing muscle relaxants, and it is associated with increased morbidity and decreased patient satisfaction. We conducted a prospective descriptive cohort study during the implementation of a practice guideline that included the selective use of sugammadex or neostigmine. The primary study aim of this pragmatic study was to estimate the incidence of PRNB at arrival to the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) when the practice guideline is followed.

METHODS

We enrolled patients undergoing orthopedic or abdominal surgery requiring neuromuscular blockade. Rocuronium administration was guided by surgical requirements and based on ideal body weight, with dose reductions for women and/or age >55 years. Only qualitative monitoring was available to the anesthesia providers, and selection of sugammadex or neostigmine was guided by tactile assessments of the response to train-of-four (TOF) stimulation by a peripheral nerve stimulator. Neostigmine was administered if no fade was detected in the TOF response at the thumb. Deeper blocks were reversed with sugammadex. The prespecified primary and secondary end points were the incidence of PRNB at arrival to the PACU, defined as a normalized TOFR (nTOFR) < 0.9, and severe PRNB, defined as nTOFR <0.7 on arrival to the PACU. Anesthesia providers were blinded to all quantitative measurements made by research staff.

RESULTS

Analysis included 163 patients, and 145 underwent orthopedic and 18 abdominal surgeries. Of the 163 patients, 92 (56%) were reversed with neostigmine and 71 (44%) with sugammadex. The overall incidence of PRNB at PACU arrival was 5 of 163 or 3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1-7). The incidence of severe PRNB in PACU was 1% (95% CI, 0-4). Three of the 5 subjects with PRNB had TOFR <0.4 at time of reversal but were given neostigmine since anesthesia providers detected no fade by qualitative assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a protocol that specifies rocuronium dosing and selective use of sugammadex versus neostigmine based on qualitative assessment of TOF count and fade allowed us to achieve an incidence of PRNB of 3% (95% CI, 1-7) at PACU arrival. Quantitative monitoring may be needed to further reduce this incidence.

摘要

背景

术后残余神经肌肉阻滞(PRNB)定义为拇内收肌四个成串刺激(TOFR)<0.9。当非去极化肌松药未被逆转或用新斯的明逆转时,这是一种常见的术后并发症。接受中效非去极化肌松药的患者中,有 25%至 58%发生 PRNB,它与发病率增加和患者满意度降低有关。我们在实施一项实践指南时进行了一项前瞻性描述性队列研究,该指南包括选择性使用琥珀胆碱或新斯的明。这项实用研究的主要研究目的是在遵循实践指南时,估计到达麻醉后恢复室(PACU)时 PRNB 的发生率。

方法

我们招募了接受骨科或腹部手术的患者,这些手术需要神经肌肉阻滞。罗库溴铵的给药根据手术要求和理想体重进行指导,对于女性和/或年龄>55 岁的患者进行剂量减少。麻醉提供者只能进行定性监测,琥珀胆碱或新斯的明的选择根据外周神经刺激器对 TOF 刺激的反应的触觉评估进行指导。如果拇指处的 TOF 反应没有衰减,则给予新斯的明。深度阻滞用琥珀胆碱逆转。预定的主要和次要终点是到达 PACU 时 PRNB 的发生率,定义为标准化 TOFR(nTOFR)<0.9,到达 PACU 时严重 PRNB 的发生率,定义为 nTOFR<0.7。麻醉提供者对研究人员进行的所有定量测量均不知情。

结果

分析纳入了 163 名患者,其中 145 名接受了骨科手术,18 名接受了腹部手术。在 163 名患者中,92 名(56%)用新斯的明逆转,71 名(44%)用琥珀胆碱逆转。到达 PACU 时 PRNB 的总体发生率为 163 例中的 5 例或 3%(95%置信区间[CI],1-7)。PACU 中严重 PRNB 的发生率为 1%(95%CI,0-4)。在 5 名发生 PRNB 的患者中,有 3 名在逆转时 TOFR<0.4,但由于麻醉提供者通过定性评估检测到无衰减,因此给予了新斯的明。

结论

使用一种方案,根据 TOF 计数和衰减的定性评估,指定罗库溴铵的剂量,并选择性使用琥珀胆碱与新斯的明,我们能够使到达 PACU 时的 PRNB 发生率达到 3%(95%CI,1-7)。可能需要进行定量监测以进一步降低这一发生率。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of a Protocol for the Management of Maintenance and Reversal of Rocuronium Block Using Neostigmine or Sugammadex.评价新斯的明或琥珀酰明胶用于罗库溴铵维持和逆转阻滞的管理方案。
Anesth Analg. 2023 Jun 1;136(6):1143-1153. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006510. Epub 2023 May 19.
2
Prospective study of residual neuromuscular block and postoperative respiratory complications in patients reversed with neostigmine versus sugammadex.新斯的明与琥珀酰明胶逆转患者肌松残余与术后呼吸并发症的前瞻性研究。
Minerva Anestesiol. 2016 Jul;82(7):735-42. Epub 2015 Oct 16.
3
Management of Muscle Relaxation With Rocuronium and Reversal With Neostigmine or Sugammadex Guided by Quantitative Neuromuscular Monitoring.定量神经肌肉监测指导下罗库溴铵的肌松管理及新斯的明或琥珀酰明胶的逆转。
Anesth Analg. 2024 Sep 1;139(3):536-544. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006511. Epub 2023 May 12.
4
Reversal with sugammadex in the absence of monitoring did not preclude residual neuromuscular block.在没有监测的情况下使用 sugammadex 逆转未能排除残余神经肌肉阻滞。
Anesth Analg. 2013 Aug;117(2):345-51. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182999672. Epub 2013 Jun 11.
5
A comparison of sugammadex and neostigmine for reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade in children.舒更葡糖钠与新斯的明用于小儿罗库溴铵诱导的神经肌肉阻滞逆转的比较。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2017 Apr;61(4):374-380. doi: 10.1111/aas.12868. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
6
Efficacy and safety of sugammadex versus neostigmine in reversing neuromuscular blockade in adults.舒更葡糖钠与新斯的明在成人中逆转神经肌肉阻滞的疗效与安全性比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 14;8(8):CD012763. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012763.
7
Effects of sugammadex on incidence of postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade: a randomized, controlled study.舒更葡糖钠对术后残余肌松发生率的影响:一项随机对照研究。
Br J Anaesth. 2015 Nov;115(5):743-51. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev104. Epub 2015 May 2.
8
Residual neuromuscular blockade in a real life clinical setting: correlation with sugammadex or neostigmine administration.真实临床环境下的残余神经肌肉阻滞:与琥珀酰明胶或新斯的明给药的相关性。
Minerva Anestesiol. 2016 May;82(5):550-8. Epub 2015 Sep 22.
9
Recovery of muscle function after deep neuromuscular block by means of diaphragm ultrasonography and adductor of pollicis acceleromyography with comparison of neostigmine vs. sugammadex as reversal drugs: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.通过膈肌超声检查和拇内收肌加速度肌电图评估深度神经肌肉阻滞术后肌肉功能恢复情况,并比较新斯的明与舒更葡糖钠作为逆转药物的效果:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2018 Feb 21;19(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2525-7.
10
Impact of reversal strategies on the incidence of postoperative residual paralysis after rocuronium relaxation without neuromuscular monitoring: A partially randomised placebo controlled trial.在没有神经肌肉监测的情况下,罗库溴铵松弛后逆转策略对术后残余瘫痪发生率的影响:一项部分随机安慰剂对照试验。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017 Sep;34(9):609-616. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000585.

引用本文的文献

1
[Neuromuscular management: state of the art and outlook].[神经肌肉管理:现状与展望]
Anaesthesiologie. 2025 Apr;74(4):204-206. doi: 10.1007/s00101-025-01526-5. Epub 2025 Mar 28.
2
[Management of neuromuscular block during general anesthesia : Results of a survey in Germany in 2020 compared to the recommendations of the first European guidelines in 2023].[全身麻醉期间神经肌肉阻滞的管理:2020年德国一项调查结果与2023年欧洲首个指南建议的比较]
Anaesthesiologie. 2025 Apr;74(4):207-217. doi: 10.1007/s00101-025-01511-y. Epub 2025 Mar 5.
3
Reversal of neuromuscular block with neostigmine and sugammadex: a retrospective cohort study in two centers using different types of neuromuscular monitoring.
新斯的明与舒更葡糖用于逆转神经肌肉阻滞:一项在两个中心开展的使用不同类型神经肌肉监测的回顾性队列研究
J Clin Monit Comput. 2025 Feb;39(1):141-148. doi: 10.1007/s10877-024-01192-9. Epub 2024 Jul 20.
4
[ESAIC and ASA guidelines for the management of neuromuscular blockade].[欧洲重症监护医学学会(ESAIC)和美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)神经肌肉阻滞管理指南]
Anaesthesiologie. 2024 Jan;73(1):51-55. doi: 10.1007/s00101-023-01372-3. Epub 2024 Jan 4.