Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Neuro-X Lab, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Deparment of Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2023 Jun;37(6):374-383. doi: 10.1177/15459683231173357. Epub 2023 May 20.
BACKGROUND: Implanted vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), when synchronized with post-stroke motor rehabilitation improves conventional motor rehabilitation training. A non-invasive VNS method known as transcutaneous auricular vagus nerves stimulation (taVNS) has emerged, which may mimic the effects of implanted VNS. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether taVNS paired with motor rehabilitation improves post-stroke motor function, and whether synchronization with movement and amount of stimulation is critical to outcomes. METHODS: We developed a closed-loop taVNS system for motor rehabilitation called motor activated auricular vagus nerve stimulation (MAAVNS) and conducted a randomized, double-blind, pilot trial investigating the use of MAAVNS to improve upper limb function in 20 stroke survivors. Participants attended 12 rehabilitation sessions over 4-weeks, and were assigned to a group that received either MAAVNS or active unpaired taVNS concurrently with task-specific training. Motor assessments were conducted at baseline, and weekly during rehabilitation training. Stimulation pulses were counted for both groups. RESULTS: A total of 16 individuals completed the trial, and both MAAVNS (n = 9) and unpaired taVNS (n = 7) demonstrated improved Fugl-Meyer Assessment upper extremity scores (Mean ± SEM, MAAVNS: 5.00 ± 1.02, unpaired taVNS: 3.14 ± 0.63). MAAVNS demonstrated greater effect size (Cohen's = 0.63) compared to unpaired taVNS (Cohen's = 0.30). Furthermore, MAAVNS participants received significantly fewer stimulation pulses (Mean ± SEM, MAAVNS: 36 070 ± 3205) than the fixed 45 000 pulses unpaired taVNS participants received ( < .05). CONCLUSION: This trial suggests stimulation timing likely matters, and that pairing taVNS with movements may be superior to an unpaired approach. Additionally, MAAVNS effect size is comparable to that of the implanted VNS approach.
背景:植入迷走神经刺激(VNS)与卒中后运动康复相结合,可改善常规运动康复训练。一种新的非侵入性 VNS 方法,即经皮耳迷走神经刺激(taVNS)已经出现,它可能模拟植入 VNS 的效果。
目的:确定 taVNS 与运动康复相结合是否能改善卒中后运动功能,以及刺激与运动的同步和刺激量是否对结果至关重要。
方法:我们开发了一种名为运动激活耳迷走神经刺激(MAAVNS)的闭环 taVNS 系统,用于运动康复,并进行了一项随机、双盲、试点试验,调查了 20 名卒中幸存者使用 MAAVNS 改善上肢功能的情况。参与者在 4 周内接受了 12 次康复治疗,分为同时接受任务特异性训练的 MAAVNS 组和主动非配对 taVNS 组。在基线和每周的康复训练中进行运动评估。记录两组的刺激脉冲数。
结果:共有 16 人完成了试验,MAAVNS(n=9)和非配对 taVNS(n=7)组的 Fugl-Meyer 上肢评估评分均有所改善(MAAVNS:5.00±1.02,非配对 taVNS:3.14±0.63)。MAAVNS 的效应量(Cohen's = 0.63)明显大于非配对 taVNS(Cohen's = 0.30)。此外,MAAVNS 组接受的刺激脉冲数明显少于非配对 taVNS 组(MAAVNS:36070±3205,非配对 taVNS:45000)( < 0.05)。
结论:本试验表明刺激时机可能很重要,将 taVNS 与运动结合可能优于非配对方法。此外,MAAVNS 的效应量与植入 VNS 方法相当。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2024-9
Int J Mol Med. 2025-10
Front Neurol. 2025-4-4
Neural Regen Res. 2026-2-1
Neural Regen Res. 2025-11-1
J Cent Nerv Syst Dis. 2024-12-13
Neuromodulation. 2022-4