• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国成人复发性急性扁桃体炎的保守治疗与扁桃体切除术对比(NATTINA):一项多中心、开放标签、随机对照试验。

Conservative management versus tonsillectomy in adults with recurrent acute tonsillitis in the UK (NATTINA): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; Ear, Nose, and Throat Department, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. Electronic address: james.o'

出版信息

Lancet. 2023 Jun 17;401(10393):2051-2059. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00519-6. Epub 2023 May 17.

DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00519-6
PMID:37209706
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tonsillectomy is regularly performed in adults with acute tonsillitis, but with scarce evidence. A reduction in tonsillectomies has coincided with an increase in acute adult hospitalisation for tonsillitis complications. We aimed to assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of conservative management versus tonsillectomy in patients with recurrent acute tonsillitis.

METHODS

This pragmatic multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial was conducted in 27 hospitals in the UK. Participants were adults aged 16 years or older who were newly referred to secondary care otolaryngology clinics with recurrent acute tonsillitis. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive tonsillectomy or conservative management using random permuted blocks of variable length. Stratification by recruiting centre and baseline symptom severity was assessed using the Tonsil Outcome Inventory-14 score (categories defined as mild 0-35, moderate 36-48, or severe 49-70). Participants in the tonsillectomy group received elective surgery to dissect the palatine tonsils within 8 weeks after random assignment and those in the conservative management group received standard non-surgical care during 24 months. The primary outcome was the number of sore throat days collected during 24 months after random assignment, reported once per week with a text message. The primary analysis was done in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. This study is registered with the ISRCTN registry, 55284102.

FINDINGS

Between May 11, 2015, and April 30, 2018, 4165 participants with recurrent acute tonsillitis were assessed for eligibility and 3712 were excluded. 453 eligible participants were randomly assigned (233 in the immediate tonsillectomy group vs 220 in the conservative management group). 429 (95%) patients were included in the primary ITT analysis (224 vs 205). The median age of participants was 23 years (IQR 19-30), with 355 (78%) females and 97 (21%) males. Most participants were White (407 [90%]). Participants in the immediate tonsillectomy group had fewer days of sore throat during 24 months than those in the conservative management group (median 23 days [IQR 11-46] vs 30 days [14-65]). After adjustment for site and baseline severity, the incident rate ratio of total sore throat days in the immediate tonsillectomy group (n=224) compared with the conservative management group (n=205) was 0·53 (95% CI 0·43 to 0·65; <0·0001). 191 adverse events in 90 (39%) of 231 participants were deemed related to tonsillectomy. The most common adverse event was bleeding (54 events in 44 [19%] participants). No deaths occurred during the study.

INTERPRETATION

Compared with conservative management, immediate tonsillectomy is clinically effective and cost-effective in adults with recurrent acute tonsillitis.

FUNDING

National Institute for Health Research.

摘要

背景

扁桃体切除术通常在患有急性扁桃体炎的成年人中进行,但证据很少。扁桃体切除术的减少与急性成人因扁桃体炎并发症住院的增加同时发生。我们旨在评估保守治疗与扁桃体切除术在复发性急性扁桃体炎患者中的临床效果和成本效益。

方法

这是一项在英国 27 家医院进行的实用、多中心、开放性、随机对照试验。参与者为新转诊至二级保健耳鼻喉科诊所的 16 岁及以上复发性急性扁桃体炎患者。患者被随机分配(1:1)接受扁桃体切除术或保守治疗,采用可变长度的随机排列块进行随机分组。使用扁桃体结局量表 14 分(分类为轻度 0-35、中度 36-48 或重度 49-70)评估按招募中心和基线症状严重程度分层。扁桃体切除术组的患者在随机分组后 8 周内接受选择性手术切除腭扁桃体,保守治疗组的患者在 24 个月内接受标准非手术治疗。主要结局是随机分组后 24 个月内的咽痛天数,每周通过短信报告一次。主要分析在意向治疗(ITT)人群中进行。该研究在 ISRCTN 注册处注册,编号为 55284102。

结果

2015 年 5 月 11 日至 2018 年 4 月 30 日,对 4165 名复发性急性扁桃体炎患者进行了资格评估,其中 3712 名患者被排除。453 名符合条件的参与者被随机分配(立即扁桃体切除术组 233 名 vs 保守治疗组 220 名)。429 名(95%)患者被纳入主要 ITT 分析(立即扁桃体切除术组 224 名 vs 保守治疗组 205 名)。参与者的中位年龄为 23 岁(IQR 19-30),其中 355 名(78%)为女性,97 名(21%)为男性。大多数参与者为白人(407 名[90%])。与保守治疗组相比,立即扁桃体切除术组在 24 个月内的咽痛天数更少(中位数 23 天 [IQR 11-46] vs 30 天 [14-65])。在调整了地点和基线严重程度后,立即扁桃体切除术组(n=224)与保守治疗组(n=205)总咽痛天数的发病率比为 0.53(95%CI 0.43-0.65;<0.0001)。231 名参与者中有 90 名(39%)发生了 191 次与扁桃体切除术相关的不良事件。最常见的不良事件是出血(44 名参与者中有 54 次[19%])。研究期间无死亡。

结论

与保守治疗相比,在复发性急性扁桃体炎的成年人中,立即进行扁桃体切除术在临床上是有效且具有成本效益的。

资金来源

英国国家卫生研究院。

相似文献

1
Conservative management versus tonsillectomy in adults with recurrent acute tonsillitis in the UK (NATTINA): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.英国成人复发性急性扁桃体炎的保守治疗与扁桃体切除术对比(NATTINA):一项多中心、开放标签、随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2023 Jun 17;401(10393):2051-2059. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00519-6. Epub 2023 May 17.
2
Tonsillectomy compared with conservative management in patients over 16 years with recurrent sore throat: the NATTINA RCT and economic evaluation.扁桃体切除术与保守治疗对 16 岁以上复发性咽痛患者的比较:NATTINA RCT 及经济学评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2023 Dec;27(31):1-195. doi: 10.3310/YKUR3660.
3
Tonsillectomy or adenotonsillectomy versus non-surgical treatment for chronic/recurrent acute tonsillitis.扁桃体切除术或腺样体扁桃体切除术与慢性/复发性急性扁桃体炎的非手术治疗对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 19;2014(11):CD001802. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001802.pub3.
4
The NAtional randomised controlled Trial of Tonsillectomy IN Adults (NATTINA): a clinical and cost-effectiveness study: study protocol for a randomised control trial.成人扁桃体切除术全国随机对照试验(NATTINA):一项临床和成本效益研究:随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2015 Jun 6;16:263. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0768-0.
5
Clinical practice guideline: tonsillitis II. Surgical management.临床实践指南:扁桃体炎 二、手术治疗
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Apr;273(4):989-1009. doi: 10.1007/s00405-016-3904-x. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
6
Tonsillectomy or adeno-tonsillectomy versus non-surgical treatment for chronic/recurrent acute tonsillitis.扁桃体切除术或腺样体扁桃体切除术与慢性/复发性急性扁桃体炎的非手术治疗对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21(1):CD001802. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001802.pub2.
7
Tonsillectomy versus tonsillotomy for recurrent acute tonsillitis in children and adults (TOTO): study protocol for a randomized non-inferiority trial.扁桃体切除术与扁桃体切开术治疗儿童和成人复发性急性扁桃体炎(TOTO):一项随机非劣效性试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2021 Jul 22;22(1):479. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05434-y.
8
Stakeholders' views of recurrent sore throat, tonsillitis and their management: a qualitative interview study for the NAtional Trial of Tonsillectomy IN Adults (NATTINA Part 1).利益相关者对复发性咽痛、扁桃体炎及其管理的看法:成人扁桃体切除术全国试验(NATTINA第1部分)的定性访谈研究
Clin Otolaryngol. 2017 Apr;42(2):301-306. doi: 10.1111/coa.12720. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
9
Clinical Practice Guideline: Tonsillectomy in Children (Update)-Executive Summary.临床实践指南:儿童扁桃体切除术(更新)-执行摘要。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Feb;160(2):187-205. doi: 10.1177/0194599818807917.
10
[Tonsillitis and sore throat in childhood].[儿童扁桃体炎与咽喉痛]
Laryngorhinootologie. 2014 Mar;93 Suppl 1:S84-102. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1363210. Epub 2014 Apr 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Return to theatre for post-tonsillectomy haemorrhage in children has not fallen with increased use of plasma ablation tonsillectomy: a retrospective analysis of 359,241 tonsillectomies in 15 years of United Kingdom Hospital Episode Statistics.随着等离子消融扁桃体切除术使用的增加,儿童扁桃体切除术后出血返回手术室的情况并未减少:对英国医院事件统计数据15年中359,241例扁桃体切除术的回顾性分析。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 28;20(7):e0328251. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328251. eCollection 2025.
2
Patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in Otolaryngology research: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.患者及公众参与耳鼻喉科研究:随机对照试验的系统评价
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 Jul 8. doi: 10.1007/s00405-025-09515-5.
3
Trends and Practices in Tonsil Surgery-A National Survey for Otorhinolaryngologists.扁桃体手术的趋势与实践——一项针对耳鼻喉科医生的全国性调查
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2025 Jun 25;10(3):e70178. doi: 10.1002/lio2.70178. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
Long-Term Efficacy and Cost-Effectiveness of Laser Tonsillotomy vs Tonsillectomy: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.激光扁桃体切除术与扁桃体切除术的长期疗效和成本效益:一项随机临床试验的二次分析
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e254858. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.4858.
5
Surgical removal of tonsils and risk of COVID-19: a nested case-control study using data from UK Biobank and AMORIS Cohort.扁桃体切除术与 COVID-19 风险:基于英国生物银行和 AMORIS 队列数据的巢式病例对照研究。
BMC Med. 2024 Oct 14;22(1):460. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03587-6.
6
Application of the Self-Assembling Peptide Hydrogel RADA16 for Hemostasis during Tonsillectomy: A Feasibility Study.自组装肽水凝胶RADA16在扁桃体切除术中用于止血的应用:一项可行性研究。
J Funct Biomater. 2024 Sep 18;15(9):271. doi: 10.3390/jfb15090271.
7
Treatment of recurrent acute tonsillitis-a systematic review and clinical practice recommendations.复发性急性扁桃体炎的治疗——一项系统评价与临床实践建议
Front Surg. 2023 Oct 10;10:1221932. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1221932. eCollection 2023.
8
Effect of the German tonsillitis guideline on indication for tonsil surgery in patients with recurrent acute tonsillitis: a population-based study.德国扁桃体炎指南对复发性急性扁桃体炎患者扁桃体切除术适应证的影响:一项基于人群的研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 17;13(1):17612. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-44661-y.