Butz David A, Plant E Ashby
Department of Psychology, Morehead State University, Morehead, KY 40351, USA.
J Pers. 2009 Oct;77(5):1311-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00583.x. Epub 2009 Jul 22.
A decade of research indicates that individual differences in motivation to respond without prejudice have important implications for the control of prejudice and interracial relations. In reviewing this work, we draw on W. Mischel and Y. Shoda's (1995, 1999) Cognitive-Affective Processing System (CAPS) to demonstrate that people with varying sources of motivation to respond without prejudice respond in distinct ways to situational cues, resulting in differing situation-behavior profiles in interracial contexts. People whose motivation is self-determined (i.e., the internally motivated) effectively control prejudice across situations and strive for positive interracial interactions. In contrast, people who respond without prejudice to avoid social sanction (i.e., the primarily externally motivated) consistently fail at regulating difficult to control prejudice and respond with anxiety and avoidance in interracial interactions. We further consider the nature of the cognitive-affective units of personality associated with motivation to respond without prejudice and their implications for the quality of interracial relations.
十年的研究表明,在无偏见回应动机方面的个体差异,对于偏见控制和跨种族关系具有重要意义。在回顾这项工作时,我们借鉴了W. 米歇尔和Y. 肖达(1995年、1999年)的认知-情感加工系统(CAPS),以证明具有不同无偏见回应动机来源的人,会以不同方式对情境线索做出反应,从而在跨种族情境中产生不同的情境-行为模式。自我决定动机的人(即内在动机者)能在各种情境中有效控制偏见,并努力实现积极的跨种族互动。相比之下,为避免社会制裁而无偏见回应的人(即主要是外在动机者),在调节难以控制的偏见方面始终失败,并在跨种族互动中表现出焦虑和回避。我们进一步探讨了与无偏见回应动机相关的人格认知-情感单元的性质,以及它们对跨种族关系质量的影响。