• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

种植体直径对沙特人群牙种植体早期存活率的影响:一项为期一年的回顾性研究。

Impact of Implant Diameter on the Early Survival Rate of Dental Implants in the Saudi Population: A One-Year Retrospective Study.

作者信息

Mously Eihab A

机构信息

Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry Taibah University, Madina, SAU.

出版信息

Cureus. 2023 Apr 18;15(4):e37765. doi: 10.7759/cureus.37765. eCollection 2023 Apr.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.37765
PMID:37214022
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10194036/
Abstract

Introduction The use of dental implants provides a revolutionary solution to the problem of missing teeth in the oral cavity. The aim of this study was to assess the early implant survival rate in relation to implant diameter and site of placement. Methods The data were collected from 186 patients treated between January 2019 and June 2021. All the implants were evaluated and restored after three months of implant placement. The early implant survival was calculated for different implant diameters with the odds ratio (OR). Results A total of 373 implants were placed. Implants were placed in the following areas: upper posterior area (UPA), n = 123, upper anterior area (UAA), n = 49, lower posterior area (LPA), n = 184, and lower anterior area (LAA), n = 17. Implants of the following diameters were placed: 3.5 mm (n = 129), 4.3 mm (n = 166), and 5 mm (n = 78). The overall early survival rate was 97.32% after three months of placement. The highest early survival rate was at LAA (100%) and the lowest early survival rate was at UAA (95.9%). The implants 5 mm in diameter had the highest early survival rate (98.72%), while the implants 3.5 mm in diameter had the lowest early survival rate (94.57%). The ORs of the early implant survival were 4.7 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.96-23.05)] and 4.42 (95% CI: 0.53-36.61) for the 4.3 mm and 5 mm implants, respectively, with no statistical significance. Conclusions The implants placed in the oral cavity had acceptable survival rates regardless of implant diameter or site of placement.

摘要

引言 牙种植体的使用为口腔内牙齿缺失问题提供了一种革命性的解决方案。本研究的目的是评估与种植体直径和植入部位相关的早期种植体存活率。方法 收集了2019年1月至2021年6月期间接受治疗的186例患者的数据。所有种植体在植入三个月后进行评估和修复。采用比值比(OR)计算不同种植体直径的早期种植体存活率。结果 共植入373枚种植体。种植体植入以下区域:上颌后牙区(UPA),n = 123;上颌前牙区(UAA),n = 49;下颌后牙区(LPA),n = 184;下颌前牙区(LAA),n = 17。植入的种植体直径如下:3.5 mm(n = 129)、4.3 mm(n = 166)和5 mm(n = 78)。植入三个月后的总体早期存活率为97.32%。早期存活率最高的是LAA(100%),最低的是UAA(95.9%)。直径5 mm的种植体早期存活率最高(98.72%),而直径3.5 mm的种植体早期存活率最低(94.57%)。4.3 mm和5 mm种植体早期种植体存活的OR分别为4.7 [95%置信区间(CI):0.96 - 23.05]和4.42(95% CI:0.53 - 36.61),无统计学意义。结论 无论种植体直径或植入部位如何,口腔内植入的种植体均具有可接受的存活率。

相似文献

1
Impact of Implant Diameter on the Early Survival Rate of Dental Implants in the Saudi Population: A One-Year Retrospective Study.种植体直径对沙特人群牙种植体早期存活率的影响:一项为期一年的回顾性研究。
Cureus. 2023 Apr 18;15(4):e37765. doi: 10.7759/cureus.37765. eCollection 2023 Apr.
2
Clinical evaluation of implant survival based on size and site of placement: A retrospective study of immediate implants at single rooted teeth sites.基于种植体大小和植入部位的种植体存留情况的临床评估:单根牙部位即刻种植体的回顾性研究
Saudi Dent J. 2015 Apr;27(2):105-11. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2014.11.003. Epub 2015 Jan 27.
3
Survival Rate of Ultrawide Diameter Implants Placed into Molar Postextraction Sockets and in Function for Up to 144 Months.植入磨牙拔牙窝并使用长达144个月的超宽直径种植体的存活率
J Prosthodont. 2023 Feb;32(2):116-124. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13534. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
4
Implant survival to 36 months as related to length and diameter.与长度和直径相关的种植体至36个月的留存率
Ann Periodontol. 2000 Dec;5(1):22-31. doi: 10.1902/annals.2000.5.1.22.
5
Role of implant diameter on long-term survival of dental implants placed in posterior maxilla: a systematic review.种植体直径对上颌后牙区种植体长期存留率的影响:一项系统评价
Clin Oral Investig. 2015 Jan;19(1):1-10. doi: 10.1007/s00784-014-1333-z. Epub 2014 Nov 1.
6
A Multilevel Analysis of Platform-Switching Flapless Implants Placed at Tissue Level: 4-year Prospective Cohort Study.多水平分析:组织水平平台转移无瓣种植体的 4 年前瞻性队列研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020 Mar/Apr;35(2):330-341. doi: 10.11607/jomi.7541.
7
Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review.上颌窦提升术对骨内种植体存留率的影响。一项系统评价。
Ann Periodontol. 2003 Dec;8(1):328-43. doi: 10.1902/annals.2003.8.1.328.
8
Narrow- and regular-diameter implants in the posterior region of the jaws to support single crowns: A 3-year split-mouth randomized clinical trial.窄径和常规直径种植体在后牙区支持单冠修复:一项为期 3 年的随机分组临床研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Jan;29(1):100-107. doi: 10.1111/clr.13076. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
9
A retrospective study on related factors affecting the survival rate of dental implants.一项关于影响种植牙存活率的相关因素的回顾性研究。
J Adv Prosthodont. 2011 Dec;3(4):204-15. doi: 10.4047/jap.2011.3.4.204. Epub 2011 Dec 28.
10
Implant-supported maxillary overdentures retained with milled bars: maxillary anterior versus maxillary posterior concept--a retrospective study.采用铣削杆固位的种植体支持上颌覆盖义齿:上颌前部与上颌后部概念——一项回顾性研究
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008 Mar-Apr;23(2):343-52.

本文引用的文献

1
Implant placement and loading protocols in partially edentulous patients: A systematic review.部分无牙颌患者种植体的植入和负荷方案:系统评价。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct;29 Suppl 16:106-134. doi: 10.1111/clr.13276.
2
Group 1 ITI Consensus Report: The influence of implant length and design and medications on clinical and patient-reported outcomes.第一组 ITI 共识报告:种植体长度和设计以及药物对临床和患者报告结局的影响。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct;29 Suppl 16:69-77. doi: 10.1111/clr.13342.
3
Analysis of risk factors for cluster behavior of dental implant failures.
种植体失败的集群行为风险因素分析。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017 Aug;19(4):632-642. doi: 10.1111/cid.12485. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
4
Clinical evaluation of implant survival based on size and site of placement: A retrospective study of immediate implants at single rooted teeth sites.基于种植体大小和植入部位的种植体存留情况的临床评估:单根牙部位即刻种植体的回顾性研究
Saudi Dent J. 2015 Apr;27(2):105-11. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2014.11.003. Epub 2015 Jan 27.
5
Long-term implant success at the Academy for Oral Implantology: 8-year follow-up and risk factor analysis.口腔种植学会长期种植成功率:8年随访及风险因素分析。
J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2014 Jun;44(3):102-8. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2014.44.3.102. Epub 2014 Jun 5.
6
Long-term evaluation of ANKYLOS® dental implants, part i: 20-year life table analysis of a longitudinal study of more than 12,500 implants.ANKYLOS®牙科种植体的长期评估,第一部分:对超过12,500颗种植体的纵向研究的20年生命表分析。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Jan;17 Suppl 1:e275-86. doi: 10.1111/cid.12154. Epub 2013 Sep 17.
7
The influence of implant diameter on its survival: a meta-analysis based on prospective clinical trials.种植体直径对其存留率的影响:一项基于前瞻性临床试验的Meta分析
J Periodontol. 2014 Apr;85(4):569-80. doi: 10.1902/jop.2013.130043. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
8
How successful are small-diameter implants? A literature review.小直径种植体的成功率如何?文献回顾。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 May;23(5):515-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02410.x. Epub 2012 Feb 7.
9
Influence of diameter and length of implant on early dental implant failure.种植体直径和长度对早期牙种植失败的影响。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Feb;68(2):414-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.10.002.
10
Immediate versus one-stage restoration of small-diameter implants for a single missing maxillary lateral incisor: a 3-year randomized clinical trial.单颗上颌侧切牙缺失时小直径种植体即刻修复与一期修复的比较:一项3年随机临床试验
J Periodontol. 2009 Sep;80(9):1393-8. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.090153.