Suppr超能文献

患者护理委员会——一种促进患者在医院查房期间参与度的工具。

Patient Care Boards - A tool to promote patient participation during hospital ward rounds.

作者信息

Poulsen Helle, Wolderslund Maiken, Iversen Else Dalsgaard, Clemensen Jane, Ammentorp Jette, Kofoed Poul-Erik

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, DK-6000 Kolding, Denmark.

Department of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark.

出版信息

PEC Innov. 2023 Mar 27;2:100150. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100150. eCollection 2023 Dec.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This pre-post intervention study investigated the effectiveness of the Patient Care Board (PCB) as a tool to increase the participation of patients and relatives during hospital ward rounds.

METHODS

Using The Activity Barometer (TAB), we rated 121 video-recorded rounds to compare participation before and after implementing the PCB into clinical practice. Associations between scores for the extent to which patients ask questions or express preferences and concerns were tested with multiple linear regression.

RESULTS

TAB-scores tended to be higher after implementing the PCB, especially for the relatives. However, no significant differences were found. The greatest impact on participation was time spent on rounds (p < 0.001). Preparing questions in advance of the round, as well as using anatomical drawings for explanations, increased patient participation (p = 0.041, 0.024). Furthermore, the implementation of the PCB led to higher nurse attendance (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Although we found tendencies towards higher participation, the study could not confirm a significant impact of the overall intervention.

INNOVATION

Our results suggest that further research is needed, to ensure a higher degree of preparation among the patients, better opportunities for relatives to participate as well as integration of visual information in the rounds.

摘要

目的

这项干预前后的研究调查了患者护理板(PCB)作为一种增加患者及其亲属在医院查房期间参与度的工具的有效性。

方法

我们使用活动晴雨表(TAB)对121次视频记录的查房进行评分,以比较将PCB应用于临床实践前后的参与度。通过多元线性回归测试患者提问或表达偏好及担忧程度的得分之间的关联。

结果

实施PCB后,TAB评分往往更高,尤其是亲属的评分。然而,未发现显著差异。对参与度影响最大的是查房所花费的时间(p < 0.001)。查房前提前准备问题以及使用解剖图进行解释可提高患者的参与度(p = 0.041,0.024)。此外,实施PCB导致护士出勤率更高(p = 0.003)。

结论

尽管我们发现参与度有提高的趋势,但该研究无法证实整体干预有显著影响。

创新点

我们的结果表明,需要进一步研究,以确保患者有更高程度的准备、亲属有更好的参与机会以及在查房中整合视觉信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/580d/10194402/5db6b12bccfe/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Patient Care Boards - A tool to promote patient participation during hospital ward rounds.
PEC Innov. 2023 Mar 27;2:100150. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100150. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Introduction of a new ward round approach in a cardiothoracic critical care unit.
Nurs Crit Care. 2015 Jul;20(4):210-8. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12149. Epub 2015 Jan 16.
3
Patient participation in inpatient ward rounds on acute inpatient medical wards: a descriptive study.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Jan;28(1):15-23. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007292. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
4
Communication during ward rounds in internal medicine. An analysis of patient-nurse-physician interactions using RIAS.
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Aug;67(3):343-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.04.011. Epub 2007 Jun 5.
5
Patients, health professionals, and the health system: influencers on patients' participation in ward rounds.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2019 Aug 22;13:1415-1429. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S211073. eCollection 2019.
6
The role of the nurse in the medical ward round.
J Adv Nurs. 1992 Mar;17(3):339-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1992.tb01912.x.
7
The ward round--patient experiences and barriers to participation.
Scand J Caring Sci. 2014 Jun;28(2):297-304. doi: 10.1111/scs.12059. Epub 2013 Jun 30.
10
Clinical Decision-Making During Psychiatric Ward Rounds.
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Sep 13;12:721699. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.721699. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

2
Validation of the Chinese Patient Participation Scale (PPS-C) in Internal Medicine Patient: A Psychometric Study.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025 Jun 10;19:1703-1715. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S518317. eCollection 2025.
4
Whiteboards to Facilitate Hospitalized Patient Communication, Safety, and Education: A Scoping Review.
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 May;40(6):1411-1418. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09419-4. Epub 2025 Feb 20.

本文引用的文献

2
3
Patients, health professionals, and the health system: influencers on patients' participation in ward rounds.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2019 Aug 22;13:1415-1429. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S211073. eCollection 2019.
4
The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners.
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208. Epub 2019 May 9.
5
Mixed methods quality evaluation of structured interprofessional medical ward rounds.
Intern Med J. 2020 Feb;50(2):222-231. doi: 10.1111/imj.14330.
6
Improving Quality Through Nursing Participation at Bedside Rounds in a Pediatric Acute Care Unit: A Pilot Project.
J Pediatr Nurs. 2018 Nov-Dec;43:45-55. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2018.08.010. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
7
Patient participation in inpatient ward rounds on acute inpatient medical wards: a descriptive study.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Jan;28(1):15-23. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007292. Epub 2018 Feb 23.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验