Suppr超能文献

需要清晰的理论来解释差异:关于双语优势辩论的观点

Clear Theories Are Needed to Interpret Differences: Perspectives on the Bilingual Advantage Debate.

作者信息

de Bruin Angela, Dick Anthony Steven, Carreiras Manuel

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of York, York, United Kingdom.

Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language (BCBL), Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain.

出版信息

Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2021 Nov 11;2(4):433-451. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00038. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

The heated debate regarding bilingual cognitive advantages remains ongoing. While there are many studies supporting positive cognitive effects of bilingualism, recent meta-analyses have concluded that there is no consistent evidence for a . In this article we focus on several theoretical concerns. First, we discuss changes in theoretical frameworks, which have led to the development of insufficiently clear theories and hypotheses that are difficult to falsify. Next, we discuss the development of looking at bilingual experiences and the need to better understand control. Last, we argue that the move from behavioural studies to a focus on brain plasticity is not going to solve the debate on cognitive effects, especially not when brain changes are interpreted in the absence of behavioural differences. Clearer theories on both behavioural and neural effects of bilingualism are needed. However, to achieve this, a solid understanding of both bilingualism and executive functions is needed first.

摘要

关于双语认知优势的激烈争论仍在继续。虽然有许多研究支持双语对认知的积极影响,但最近的荟萃分析得出结论,没有一致的证据表明存在……在本文中,我们关注几个理论问题。首先,我们讨论理论框架的变化,这些变化导致了不够清晰、难以证伪的理论和假设的发展。接下来,我们讨论看待双语经历的发展以及更好地理解……控制的必要性。最后,我们认为从行为研究转向关注大脑可塑性并不能解决关于认知影响的争论,尤其是在没有行为差异的情况下对大脑变化进行解释时。需要更清晰的关于双语行为和神经影响的理论。然而,要做到这一点,首先需要对双语和执行功能有扎实的理解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bd7/10158573/b506bf5b5015/nol-2-4-433-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验