• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从双语特质到双语状态:通过即时变化理解认知与语言处理

Moving From Bilingual Traits to States: Understanding Cognition and Language Processing Through Moment-to-Moment Variation.

作者信息

Salig Lauren K, Valdés Kroff Jorge R, Slevc L Robert, Novick Jared M

机构信息

Program in Neuroscience and Cognitive Science, University of Maryland, College Park, USA.

Department of Spanish and Portuguese Studies, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.

出版信息

Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2021 Nov 11;2(4):487-512. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00046. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1162/nol_a_00046
PMID:37214629
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10158593/
Abstract

The study of how bilingualism is linked to cognitive processing, including executive functioning, has historically focused on comparing bilinguals to monolinguals across a range of tasks. These group comparisons presume to capture relatively stable cognitive traits and have revealed important insights about the architecture of the language processing system that could not have been gleaned from studying monolinguals alone. However, there are drawbacks to using a group-comparison, or Traits, approach. In this theoretical review, we outline some limitations of treating executive functions as stable traits and of treating bilinguals as a uniform group when compared to monolinguals. To build on what we have learned from group comparisons, we advocate for an emerging complementary approach to the question of cognition and bilingualism. Using an approach that compares bilinguals to under different linguistic or cognitive contexts allows researchers to ask questions about how language and cognitive processes interact based on dynamically fluctuating cognitive and neural . A States approach, which has already been used by bilingualism researchers, allows for cause-and-effect hypotheses and shifts our focus from questions of group differences to questions of how varied linguistic environments influence cognitive operations in the moment and how fluctuations in cognitive engagement impact language processing.

摘要

双语能力与认知加工(包括执行功能)之间联系的研究,历来侧重于在一系列任务中将双语者与单语者进行比较。这些组间比较旨在捕捉相对稳定的认知特征,并揭示了有关语言加工系统结构的重要见解,而这些见解是仅通过研究单语者无法获得的。然而,使用组间比较法或特质法存在一些缺点。在这篇理论综述中,我们概述了将执行功能视为稳定特质以及将双语者与单语者相比视为一个统一群体时的一些局限性。为了在我们从组间比较中学到的知识基础上更进一步,我们提倡一种针对认知与双语问题的新兴补充方法。使用一种在不同语言或认知背景下将双语者进行比较的方法,使研究人员能够基于动态波动的认知和神经状态,提出关于语言与认知过程如何相互作用的问题。双语研究人员已经采用的状态法,允许提出因果假设,并将我们的关注点从群体差异问题转移到不同语言环境如何在当下影响认知操作以及认知参与度的波动如何影响语言加工的问题上。

相似文献

1
Moving From Bilingual Traits to States: Understanding Cognition and Language Processing Through Moment-to-Moment Variation.从双语特质到双语状态:通过即时变化理解认知与语言处理
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2021 Nov 11;2(4):487-512. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00046. eCollection 2021.
2
The Relationship Between Bilingualism and Control Aspect of Intelligence: A Study of Persian-speaking Individuals.双语能力与智力控制方面的关系:对说波斯语者的一项研究
Basic Clin Neurosci. 2023 Mar-Apr;14(2):237-246. doi: 10.32598/bcn.2022.2777.2. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
3
Specific language impairment in language-minority children from low-income families.低收入家庭中语言少数群体儿童的特定语言障碍。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2014 Nov;49(6):736-47. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12107. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
4
Functional neural architecture of cognitive control mediates the relationship between individual differences in bilingual experience and behaviour.认知控制的功能神经结构介导了个体双语经验差异与行为之间的关系。
Neuroimage. 2023 Jun;273:120085. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120085. Epub 2023 Apr 3.
5
Bilingual and monolingual brains compared: a functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation of syntactic processing and a possible "neural signature" of bilingualism.双语和单语大脑的比较:一项关于句法处理的功能磁共振成像研究以及双语可能的“神经特征”
J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Jan;20(1):153-69. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20011.
6
Non-linguistic cognitive measures as predictors of functionally defined developmental language disorder in monolingual and bilingual children.非语言认知测量作为单语和双语儿童功能性定义的发育性语言障碍的预测指标。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2021 Jul;56(4):858-872. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12632. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
7
Age-related effect on language control and executive control in bilingual and monolingual speakers: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.年龄对双语和单语使用者语言控制和执行控制的影响:行为和电生理证据。
Neuropsychologia. 2020 Feb 17;138:107336. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107336. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
8
Executive functioning during verbal fluency tasks in bilinguals: A systematic review.双语者言语流畅性任务中的执行功能:系统评价。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2023 Jul-Aug;58(4):1316-1334. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12855. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
9
Bilinguals are better than monolinguals in detecting manipulative discourse.双语者比单语者更善于发现操纵性话语。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 7;16(9):e0256173. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256173. eCollection 2021.
10
Neuropsychological, cognitive, and theoretical considerations for evaluation of bilingual individuals.评估双语个体的神经心理学、认知及理论考量
Neuropsychol Rev. 2008 Sep;18(3):255-68. doi: 10.1007/s11065-008-9069-7. Epub 2008 Oct 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Cognitive control states and traits modulate lexical competition during word production.认知控制状态和特质在词汇生成过程中调节词汇竞争。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 14;15(1):25381. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-10039-5.
2
Variation in how cognitive control modulates sentence processing.认知控制如何调节句子处理的差异。
R Soc Open Sci. 2023 Apr 19;10(4):211969. doi: 10.1098/rsos.211969. eCollection 2023 Apr.
3
Type of bilingualism conditions individual differences in the oscillatory dynamics of inhibitory control.双语类型影响抑制控制振荡动力学的个体差异。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Jul 28;16:910910. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.910910. eCollection 2022.
4
Phasic pupillary responses reveal differential engagement of attentional control in bilingual spoken language processing.时相性瞳孔反应揭示双语口语处理中注意力控制的差异参与。
Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 6;11(1):23474. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03008-1.
5
Research on bilingualism as discovery science.双语能力作为发现科学的研究。
Brain Lang. 2021 Nov;222:105014. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2021.105014. Epub 2021 Sep 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Direct impact of cognitive control on sentence processing and comprehension.认知控制对句子处理和理解的直接影响。
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2021;36(2):211-239. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2020.1836379. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
2
Clear Theories Are Needed to Interpret Differences: Perspectives on the Bilingual Advantage Debate.需要清晰的理论来解释差异:关于双语优势辩论的观点
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2021 Nov 11;2(4):433-451. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00038. eCollection 2021.
3
Individual Differences in Inhibitory Control: A latent Variable Analysis.抑制控制中的个体差异:一项潜在变量分析。
J Cogn. 2021 Feb 18;4(1):17. doi: 10.5334/joc.150.
4
A common selection mechanism at each linguistic level in bilingual and monolingual language production.双语和单语语言产生中每个语言层次的常见选择机制。
Cognition. 2021 Aug;213:104625. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104625. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
5
Neural signatures of inhibitory control in intra-sentential code-switching: Evidence from fMRI.句内语码转换中抑制控制的神经特征:来自功能磁共振成像的证据
J Neurolinguistics. 2021 Feb;57. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2020.100938. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
6
Explaining Individual Differences in Executive Functions Performance in Multilinguals: The Impact of Code-Switching and Alternating Between Multicultural Identity Styles.解释多语言者执行功能表现的个体差异:语码转换和多元文化身份风格之间转换的影响。
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 23;11:561088. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.561088. eCollection 2020.
7
Are All Code-Switches Processed Alike? Examining Semantic v. Language Unexpectancy.所有语码转换的处理方式都一样吗?审视语义与语言意外性
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 3;11:2138. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02138. eCollection 2020.
8
Using Network Science to Map What Montréal Bilinguals Talk about Across Languages and Communicative Contexts.运用网络科学描绘蒙特利尔双语者在跨语言及交际语境下的谈话内容。
J Neurolinguistics. 2020 Nov;56. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2020.100913. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
9
Meta-Analysis Reveals a Bilingual Advantage That Is Dependent on Task and Age.荟萃分析揭示了一种依赖于任务和年龄的双语优势。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 24;11:1458. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01458. eCollection 2020.
10
Processing Code-Switches in the Presence of Others: An ERP Study.在他人面前处理语码转换:一项事件相关电位研究。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 26;11:1288. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01288. eCollection 2020.