Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Department of Medicine, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Hepatol Commun. 2023 May 23;7(6). doi: 10.1097/HC9.0000000000000157. eCollection 2023 Jun 1.
Cirrhosis care and outcomes are improved with access to subspecialty gastroenterology and hepatology care. In qualitative interviews, we investigated clinicians' perceptions of factors that optimize or impede cirrhosis care.
We conducted 24 telephone interviews with subspecialty clinicians at 7 Veterans Affairs medical centers with high- and low-complexity services. Purposive sampling stratified Veterans Affairs medical centers on timely post-hospitalization follow-up, a quality measure. We asked open-ended questions about facilitators and barriers of care coordination, access to appointments, procedures, transplantation, management of complications, keeping up to date with medical knowledge, and telehealth use.
Key themes that facilitated care were structural: multidisciplinary teams, clinical dashboards, mechanisms for appointment tracking and reminders, and local or virtual access to transplant and liver cancer specialists through the "specialty care access network extension for community health care outcomes" program. Coordination and efficient communication between transplant and non-transplant specialists and between transplant and primary care facilitated timely care. Same-day access to laboratory, procedural, and clinical services is an indicator of high-quality care. Barriers included lack of on-site procedural services, clinician turnover, patient social needs related to transportation, costs, and patient forgetfulness due to HE. Telehealth enabled lower complexity sites to obtain recommendations for complex patient cases. Barriers to telehealth included lack of credit (eg, VA billing equivalent), inadequate staff, lack of audiovisual technology support, and patient and staff discomfort with technology. Telehealth was optimal for return visits, cases where physical examination was nonessential, and where distance and transportation precluded in-person care. Rapid telehealth uptake during the COVID-19 pandemic was a positive disruptor and facilitated use.
We identify multi-level factors related to structure, staffing, technology, and care organization to optimize cirrhosis care delivery.
通过获得消化内科和肝脏病学专业的医疗服务,肝硬化的治疗和预后均得到改善。在定性访谈中,我们研究了临床医生对优化或阻碍肝硬化治疗的因素的看法。
我们对 7 家退伍军人事务部医疗中心的 24 名专科临床医生进行了电话访谈,这些医疗中心提供高复杂度和低复杂度的服务。退伍军人事务部医疗中心根据及时进行住院后随访的质量指标进行了有针对性的抽样。我们询问了有关以下内容的开放性问题:促进护理协调、预约、程序、移植、并发症管理、了解最新医学知识以及使用远程医疗的有利因素和障碍。
促进护理的关键主题是结构性的:多学科团队、临床仪表盘、预约跟踪和提醒机制、通过“特殊护理访问网络扩展社区卫生保健结果”计划获得移植和肝癌专家的本地或虚拟访问。移植和非移植专家之间以及移植和初级保健之间的协调和高效沟通促进了及时护理。当天获得实验室、程序和临床服务是高质量护理的指标。障碍包括缺乏现场程序服务、临床医生的更替、与交通、费用和肝性脑病引起的患者健忘相关的患者社会需求。远程医疗使低复杂度的站点能够获得复杂患者病例的建议。远程医疗的障碍包括缺乏信用(例如,VA 计费等效)、人员不足、缺乏视听技术支持以及患者和员工对技术的不适。远程医疗对于复诊、不需要体格检查的病例以及因距离和交通不便而无法进行当面护理的病例效果最佳。在 COVID-19 大流行期间,远程医疗的快速采用是一个积极的破坏因素,并促进了其使用。
我们确定了与结构、人员配备、技术和护理组织相关的多层次因素,以优化肝硬化的护理服务。