• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为生殖、母婴、新生儿、儿童和青少年健康质量改进举措进行利益攸关者和社区参与的工具的映射和综合。

A mapping and synthesis of tools for stakeholder and community engagement in quality improvement initiatives for reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health.

机构信息

Division of Public Health, Michigan State University, College of Human Medicine, Flint, MI, USA.

UCD Centre for Interdisciplinary Research, Education and Innovation in Health Systems, School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2021 Jun;24(3):744-756. doi: 10.1111/hex.13237. Epub 2021 Apr 1.

DOI:10.1111/hex.13237
PMID:33794046
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8235899/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Stakeholder and community engagement promotes collaboration and gives service users an opportunity to actively participate in the care they receive. Recognizing this potential, The Network for Improving Quality of Care for maternal, newborn and child health aimed to identify tools and operational guidance to integrate stakeholder and community engagement into quality improvement (QI) implementation.

METHODS

A mapping, consisting of a literature review and an open call through email and listservers, for implementation tools was conducted. Materials were included if they provided guidance on stakeholder and community engagement aligned to the Network's QI framework comprising seven phases. Screening of tools was done by two reviewers.

RESULTS

The literature search and the call for tools returned 197 documents with 70 tools included after screening. Most included tools (70%) were published after 2010. International organizations were the most frequently cited authors of tools. Only 15 tools covered all seven phases of the QI framework; few tools covered the more 'technical' phase of the QI framework: adapting standards and refining strategies.

CONCLUSION

The quantity of tools and their varied characteristics including types of stakeholder and community engagement processes across the QI framework confirms that engagement cannot be captured in a 'one-size-fits-all' formula. Many tools were designed with a generic focus to allow for adaption and use in different settings and sectors. Country programmes looking to strengthen engagement approaches can take advantage of available tools through an online portal on the WHO website and adapt them to meet their specific needs and context.

PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT

Programme implementers provided tools and resources during data collection.

摘要

背景

利益相关者和社区参与促进了合作,并使服务使用者有机会积极参与他们所接受的护理。认识到这一潜力,改善母婴和儿童健康护理质量网络旨在确定工具和操作指南,将利益相关者和社区参与纳入质量改进(QI)实施中。

方法

通过电子邮件和列表服务器进行了一项映射,包括文献综述和公开呼吁,以寻找实施工具。如果这些工具提供了与网络的QI 框架(包括七个阶段)一致的利益相关者和社区参与指导,则将其纳入。由两名评审员对工具进行筛选。

结果

文献检索和工具征集共返回了 197 份文件,筛选后纳入了 70 份工具。大多数纳入的工具(70%)是在 2010 年后出版的。国际组织是工具最常被引用的作者。只有 15 个工具涵盖了 QI 框架的所有七个阶段;很少有工具涵盖了 QI 框架的更“技术性”阶段:适应标准和完善策略。

结论

工具的数量及其不同特点,包括 QI 框架中利益相关者和社区参与过程的类型,证实了参与不能用“一刀切”的公式来概括。许多工具的设计具有通用重点,允许在不同的环境和部门中进行调整和使用。希望加强参与方法的国家方案可以通过世卫组织网站上的在线门户利用现有工具,并根据其特定需求和背景进行调整。

公众参与

方案执行者在数据收集过程中提供了工具和资源。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f9b/8235899/51c55dfe2a4e/HEX-24-744-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f9b/8235899/f7e028189d22/HEX-24-744-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f9b/8235899/8ce5e8393a42/HEX-24-744-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f9b/8235899/b5609446821b/HEX-24-744-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f9b/8235899/51c55dfe2a4e/HEX-24-744-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f9b/8235899/f7e028189d22/HEX-24-744-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f9b/8235899/8ce5e8393a42/HEX-24-744-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f9b/8235899/b5609446821b/HEX-24-744-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f9b/8235899/51c55dfe2a4e/HEX-24-744-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
A mapping and synthesis of tools for stakeholder and community engagement in quality improvement initiatives for reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health.为生殖、母婴、新生儿、儿童和青少年健康质量改进举措进行利益攸关者和社区参与的工具的映射和综合。
Health Expect. 2021 Jun;24(3):744-756. doi: 10.1111/hex.13237. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Engaging stakeholders: lessons from the use of participatory tools for improving maternal and child care health services.让利益相关者参与进来:利用参与式工具改善母婴保健服务的经验教训。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Dec 28;15(Suppl 2):106. doi: 10.1186/s12961-017-0271-z.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Feasibility of establishing a core set of sexual, reproductive, maternal, newborn, child, and adolescent health indicators in humanitarian settings: results from a multi-methods assessment in the Democratic Republic of Congo.在人道主义环境中建立一套核心的性健康、生殖健康、孕产妇健康、新生儿健康、儿童健康和青少年健康指标的可行性:来自刚果民主共和国的多方法评估结果。
Reprod Health. 2022 Jun 2;19(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01415-9.
6
Stakeholder engagement to introduce a standardised register for improved inpatient care of newborns and sick children in Bangladesh.利益相关者参与引入标准化登记系统,以改善孟加拉国新生儿和患病儿童的住院治疗。
J Glob Health. 2024 May 17;14:04082. doi: 10.7189/jogh.14.04082.
7
Statewide implementation of a quality improvement initiative for reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health and nutritionin Bihar, India.印度比哈尔邦生殖、孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康与营养质量改进倡议的全州实施。
J Glob Health. 2020 Dec;10(2):021008. doi: 10.7189/jogh.10.021008.
8
Knowledge translation strategies for policy and action focused on sexual, reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health and well-being: a rapid scoping review.知识转化策略在政策和行动方面聚焦于性健康、生殖健康、母婴健康、新生儿健康、儿童健康和青少年健康及福祉:快速范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 17;12(1):e053919. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053919.
9
Landscape analyses of gaps in reproductive, maternal, newborn, child, and adolescent health policies and guidelines to catalyse policy implementation improvement in Uganda.乌干达生殖、孕产妇、新生儿、儿童和青少年健康政策与指南差距的态势分析,以促进政策实施改进
Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 Apr 8;23(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12961-025-01302-2.
10
Towards an Implementation-STakeholder Engagement Model (I-STEM) for improving health and social care services.迈向实施利益相关者参与模型(I-STEM),以改善医疗保健服务。
Health Expect. 2023 Oct;26(5):1997-2012. doi: 10.1111/hex.13808. Epub 2023 Jul 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Meaningfulness, feasibility, and usability of quality-of-care measures for maternal and infant health: A structured mixed-methods review.母婴健康护理质量衡量指标的意义、可行性和可用性:一项结构化混合方法综述
J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Dec 18;9(1):e17. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.681. eCollection 2025.
2
How have Ontario Public Health units engaged with faith-based organizations to build confidence in COVID-19 vaccines among ethno-racial communities.安大略省公共卫生部门如何与基于信仰的组织合作,以增强少数族裔社区对新冠疫苗的信心。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Dec 31;4(12):e0003924. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003924. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Ebola response and community engagement: how to build a bridge?埃博拉应对与社区参与:如何搭建桥梁?
Lancet. 2019 Dec 21;394(10216):2242. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32532-2.
2
Estimating the global impact of poor quality of care on maternal and neonatal outcomes in 81 low- and middle-income countries: A modeling study.评估 81 个中低收入国家中护理质量差对母婴结局的全球影响:一项建模研究。
PLoS Med. 2019 Dec 18;16(12):e1002990. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002990. eCollection 2019 Dec.
3
Measuring quality of care for all women and newborns: how do we know if we are doing it right? A review of facility assessment tools.
Mobilizing stakeholders for implant removals in Burkina Faso using landscape assessment data.
利用景观评估数据在布基纳法索动员利益相关者进行植入物移除。
BMC Womens Health. 2024 May 20;24(1):301. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-03121-z.
4
Lessons learnt and best practices in scaling up an emergency transportation system to tackle maternal and neonatal mortality: a qualitative study of key stakeholders in Shinyanga, Tanzania.扩大应急运输系统以降低孕产妇和新生儿死亡率的经验教训与最佳实践:对坦桑尼亚希尼安加关键利益相关者的定性研究
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 19;14(2):e073859. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073859.
5
Community perspectives and experiences of quality maternal and newborn care in East New Britain, Papua New Guinea.东新不列颠省,巴布亚新几内亚的母婴保健质量的社区视角和经验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jul 20;23(1):780. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09723-x.
6
Service user and stakeholder engagement in maternal and newborn health research in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review protocol.服务使用者和利益相关者参与中低收入国家母婴健康研究:系统评价方案。
PLoS One. 2023 May 23;18(5):e0286145. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286145. eCollection 2023.
7
Institutionalising community engagement for quality of care: moving beyond the rhetoric.将社区参与制度化,以提高护理质量:超越言辞。
BMJ. 2023 May 15;381:e072638. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-072638.
8
What's in a name? Unpacking 'Community ' terminology in reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health: a scoping review.名称的含义是什么?生殖、孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康领域中“社区”术语的解析:范围综述。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Feb;8(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009423.
9
Respecting Faith, Hope, and Miracles in African American Christian Patients at End-of-Life: Moving from Labeling Goals of Care as "Aggressive" to Providing Equitable Goal-Concordant Care.尊重非裔美国基督教患者在生命末期的信仰、希望和奇迹:从将医疗照护目标贴上“激进”标签,转变为提供公平的目标一致的医疗照护。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2023 Aug;10(4):2054-2060. doi: 10.1007/s40615-022-01385-5. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
10
Integrated Sustainable childhood Pneumonia and Infectious disease Reduction in Nigeria (INSPIRING) through whole system strengthening in Jigawa, Nigeria: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.通过在尼日利亚吉加瓦全面加强系统来整合可持续儿童肺炎和传染病减少(尼日利亚 Inspiring):一项整群随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Jan 31;23(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05859-5.
衡量所有妇女和新生儿护理质量:我们如何知道自己做得是否正确?设施评估工具的回顾。
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 May;7(5):e624-e632. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30033-6. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
4
Stakeholder Participation for Legitimate Priority Setting: A Checklist.利益相关者参与合法的优先级设定:检查表。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Nov 1;7(11):973-976. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.57.
5
Universal health coverage and community engagement.全民健康覆盖与社区参与。
Bull World Health Organ. 2018 Sep 1;96(9):660-661. doi: 10.2471/BLT.17.202382. Epub 2018 Jul 16.
6
Engaging patients to improve quality of care: a systematic review.参与患者以提高医疗质量:系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2018 Jul 26;13(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0784-z.
7
Practical recommendations for the evaluation of improvement initiatives.改进计划评估的实用建议。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2018 Apr 20;30(suppl_1):29-36. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzy021.
8
Countdown to 2030: tracking progress towards universal coverage for reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health.倒计时 2030:追踪实现生殖、孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康普遍覆盖的进展。
Lancet. 2018 Apr 14;391(10129):1538-1548. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30104-1. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
9
Community Involvement in Health Systems Strengthening to Improve Global Health Outcomes: A Review of Guidelines and Potential Roles.社区参与卫生系统强化以改善全球健康成果:指南及潜在作用综述
Int Q Community Health Educ. 2017 Jul;37(3-4):139-149. doi: 10.1177/0272684X17738089. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
10
Factors affecting effective community participation in maternal and newborn health programme planning, implementation and quality of care interventions.影响社区有效参与孕产妇和新生儿健康规划、实施和护理质量干预的因素。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Aug 31;17(1):268. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1443-0.