• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相信社会变革是可能的:促进非罗姆人作为盟友参与和动员的集体效能。

Believing that social change is possible: Collective efficacy to promote engagement and mobilization of non-Roma as allies.

作者信息

Urbiola Ana, López-Rodríguez Lucía, Torres-Vega Laura C, Poslon Xenia-Daniela, Lášticová Barbara, Pántya József, Szekeres Hanna, Kende Anna

机构信息

Department of Social Psychology, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.

Center for the Study of Migrations and Intercultural Relations (CEMyRI), Almería, Spain.

出版信息

Br J Soc Psychol. 2025 Jul;64(3):e12895. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12895.

DOI:10.1111/bjso.12895
PMID:40348591
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12079007/
Abstract

We analyzed the effect of collective efficacy on mobilizing allies for Roma rights and the role of legitimizing ideologies and perceived discrimination as moderators. In an online experiment, pooling two samples of non-Roma Hungarians (n = 397) and Spaniards (n = 339), participants were randomly assigned to a high (vs. low) efficacy condition and reported their perceived collective efficacy, collective action intentions, and participation for supporting Roma. Pooled analyses showed that participants were more willing to take action in the high (vs. low) efficacy condition, although meritocracy beliefs moderated the effects. In a second study in Slovakia (n = 454), with a control condition, we found indirect effects of the manipulation of collective efficacy, supporting the idea that decreasing perceived collective efficacy predicts lower collective action intentions and participation. In a third study in Hungary (n = 382), we disentangled collective efficacy from social norms and found indirect effects via perceived collective efficacy. Participants in the low efficacy condition (vs. high efficacy or control) perceived less collective efficacy as allies, which in turn was associated with lower collective action. We discuss the conceptualization of collective efficacy in experimental studies and its implications for the mobilization of equality.

摘要

我们分析了集体效能感在为罗姆人权利动员盟友方面的作用,以及合法化意识形态和感知到的歧视作为调节变量的作用。在一项在线实验中,我们将两组非罗姆匈牙利人(n = 397)和西班牙人(n = 339)的样本合并,参与者被随机分配到高(与低)效能感条件下,并报告他们感知到的集体效能感、集体行动意图以及支持罗姆人的参与情况。汇总分析表明,尽管精英主义信念调节了这种影响,但参与者在高(与低)效能感条件下更愿意采取行动。在斯洛伐克进行的第二项研究(n = 454)中,设置了一个控制条件,我们发现了集体效能感操纵的间接影响,支持了这样一种观点,即降低感知到的集体效能感预示着较低的集体行动意图和参与度。在匈牙利进行的第三项研究(n = 382)中,我们将集体效能感与社会规范区分开来,并发现了通过感知到的集体效能感产生的间接影响。低效能感条件下(与高效能感或控制条件相比)的参与者作为盟友感知到的集体效能感较低,这反过来又与较低的集体行动相关。我们讨论了实验研究中集体效能感的概念化及其对平等动员的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7eeb/12079007/35f748568adc/BJSO-64-0-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7eeb/12079007/4b2f957e038d/BJSO-64-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7eeb/12079007/526f2f7a0d7b/BJSO-64-0-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7eeb/12079007/f6d831f0e50a/BJSO-64-0-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7eeb/12079007/35f748568adc/BJSO-64-0-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7eeb/12079007/4b2f957e038d/BJSO-64-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7eeb/12079007/526f2f7a0d7b/BJSO-64-0-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7eeb/12079007/f6d831f0e50a/BJSO-64-0-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7eeb/12079007/35f748568adc/BJSO-64-0-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Believing that social change is possible: Collective efficacy to promote engagement and mobilization of non-Roma as allies.相信社会变革是可能的:促进非罗姆人作为盟友参与和动员的集体效能。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2025 Jul;64(3):e12895. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12895.
2
Investigating majority-minority asymmetries between intergroup contact and collective action for Roma rights.调查罗姆人权利的群体间接触与集体行动中的多数群体与少数群体不对称性。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2025 Apr;64(2):e12880. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12880.
3
The mediating effect of discrimination, social support and hopelessness on self-rated health of Roma adolescents in Slovakia.歧视、社会支持和绝望感对斯洛伐克罗姆青少年自评健康状况的中介作用。
Int J Equity Health. 2015 Nov 19;14:137. doi: 10.1186/s12939-015-0270-z.
4
State responsiveness, collective efficacy and threat perception: Catalyst and complacency effects in opposition to crime across eight countries.国家响应能力、集体效能感与威胁认知:八个国家打击犯罪中的催化效应与自满效应
Br J Soc Psychol. 2025 Jan;64(1):e12832. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12832.
5
Behavioural challenges of minorities: Social identity and role models.少数民族的行为挑战:社会认同与榜样作用。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 26;14(7):e0220010. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220010. eCollection 2019.
6
Why don't segregated Roma do more for their health? An explanatory framework from an ethnographic study in Slovakia.为什么被隔离的罗姆人不为自己的健康做更多的事情?来自斯洛伐克民族志研究的解释框架。
Int J Public Health. 2018 Dec;63(9):1123-1131. doi: 10.1007/s00038-018-1134-2. Epub 2018 Jun 16.
7
Endorsing a Civic (vs. an Ethnic) Definition of Citizenship Predicts Higher Pro-minority and Lower Pro-majority Collective Action Intentions.支持公民身份的公民(而非种族)定义预示着更高的支持少数群体和更低的支持多数群体的集体行动意图。
Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 7;9:1402. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01402. eCollection 2018.
8
Transforming individual civic engagement into community collective efficacy: the role of bonding social capital.将个体公民参与转化为社区集体效能:联结社会资本的作用。
Am J Community Psychol. 2014 Dec;54(3-4):328-36. doi: 10.1007/s10464-014-9675-x.
9
Social mechanisms behind the poor health of marginalized Roma: Novel insights and implications from four ethnographic studies in Slovakia.边缘化罗姆人健康状况不佳的社会机制:来自斯洛伐克四项民族志研究的新见解和启示。
Soc Sci Med. 2024 Nov;360:117322. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117322. Epub 2024 Sep 13.
10
Assessing disparities in health and living conditions: a comparative study of Hungarian-speaking Roma and non-Roma women across Hungary, Romania, and Slovakia.评估健康和生活条件方面的差异:匈牙利、罗马尼亚和斯洛伐克讲匈牙利语的罗姆人和非罗姆妇女的比较研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Aug 21;12:1438018. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1438018. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Believing That We Can Change Our World for the Better: A Triple-A (Agent-Action-Aim) Framework of Self-Efficacy Beliefs in the Context of Collective Social and Ecological Aims.相信我们可以让世界变得更美好:集体社会和生态目标背景下的自我效能信念的 AAA(Agent-Action-Aim)框架。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2024 Feb;28(1):11-53. doi: 10.1177/10888683231178056. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
2
Belief in School Meritocracy and the Legitimization of Social and Income Inequality.对学校精英制度的信仰以及社会和收入不平等的合法化。
Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2023 Jun;14(5):621-635. doi: 10.1177/19485506221111017. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
3
Applying the Dynamic Dual Pathway Model of Approach Coping to Collective Action Among Advantaged Group Allies and Disadvantaged Group Members.
将应对方式的动态双路径模型应用于优势群体盟友和弱势群体成员之间的集体行动。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 6;13:875848. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.875848. eCollection 2022.
4
Collective climate action: When do people turn into collective environmental agents?集体气候行动:人们何时会转变为集体环境行动者?
Curr Opin Psychol. 2021 Dec;42:114-119. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.05.001. Epub 2021 May 15.
5
Testing the Social Identity Model of Collective Action Longitudinally and Across Structurally Disadvantaged and Advantaged Groups.纵向和跨结构劣势和优势群体测试集体行动的社会认同模型。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2020 Jun;46(6):823-838. doi: 10.1177/0146167219879111. Epub 2019 Oct 15.
6
Primes and Consequences: A Systematic Review of Meritocracy in Intergroup Relations.优势与后果:群体间关系中精英主义的系统综述
Front Psychol. 2019 Sep 19;10:2007. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02007. eCollection 2019.
7
A social identity model of pro-environmental action (SIMPEA).促进环保行为的社会认同模型 (SIMPEA)。
Psychol Rev. 2018 Mar;125(2):245-269. doi: 10.1037/rev0000090. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
8
Hidden consequences of political efficacy: Testing an efficacy-apathy model of political mobilization.政治效能的潜在后果:检验政治动员的效能—冷漠模型
Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2015 Oct;21(4):533-40. doi: 10.1037/cdp0000029. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
9
Acting in solidarity: Testing an extended dual pathway model of collective action by bystander group members.团结一致行动:通过旁观者群体成员检验集体行动的扩展双重途径模型。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2015 Sep;54(3):539-60. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12095. Epub 2014 Nov 19.
10
Explaining radical group behavior: Developing emotion and efficacy routes to normative and nonnormative collective action.解释激进团体行为:发展情感和效能途径,以实现规范和非规范的集体行动。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Jul;101(1):129-48. doi: 10.1037/a0022728.