Suppr超能文献

相信社会变革是可能的:促进非罗姆人作为盟友参与和动员的集体效能。

Believing that social change is possible: Collective efficacy to promote engagement and mobilization of non-Roma as allies.

作者信息

Urbiola Ana, López-Rodríguez Lucía, Torres-Vega Laura C, Poslon Xenia-Daniela, Lášticová Barbara, Pántya József, Szekeres Hanna, Kende Anna

机构信息

Department of Social Psychology, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.

Center for the Study of Migrations and Intercultural Relations (CEMyRI), Almería, Spain.

出版信息

Br J Soc Psychol. 2025 Jul;64(3):e12895. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12895.

Abstract

We analyzed the effect of collective efficacy on mobilizing allies for Roma rights and the role of legitimizing ideologies and perceived discrimination as moderators. In an online experiment, pooling two samples of non-Roma Hungarians (n = 397) and Spaniards (n = 339), participants were randomly assigned to a high (vs. low) efficacy condition and reported their perceived collective efficacy, collective action intentions, and participation for supporting Roma. Pooled analyses showed that participants were more willing to take action in the high (vs. low) efficacy condition, although meritocracy beliefs moderated the effects. In a second study in Slovakia (n = 454), with a control condition, we found indirect effects of the manipulation of collective efficacy, supporting the idea that decreasing perceived collective efficacy predicts lower collective action intentions and participation. In a third study in Hungary (n = 382), we disentangled collective efficacy from social norms and found indirect effects via perceived collective efficacy. Participants in the low efficacy condition (vs. high efficacy or control) perceived less collective efficacy as allies, which in turn was associated with lower collective action. We discuss the conceptualization of collective efficacy in experimental studies and its implications for the mobilization of equality.

摘要

我们分析了集体效能感在为罗姆人权利动员盟友方面的作用,以及合法化意识形态和感知到的歧视作为调节变量的作用。在一项在线实验中,我们将两组非罗姆匈牙利人(n = 397)和西班牙人(n = 339)的样本合并,参与者被随机分配到高(与低)效能感条件下,并报告他们感知到的集体效能感、集体行动意图以及支持罗姆人的参与情况。汇总分析表明,尽管精英主义信念调节了这种影响,但参与者在高(与低)效能感条件下更愿意采取行动。在斯洛伐克进行的第二项研究(n = 454)中,设置了一个控制条件,我们发现了集体效能感操纵的间接影响,支持了这样一种观点,即降低感知到的集体效能感预示着较低的集体行动意图和参与度。在匈牙利进行的第三项研究(n = 382)中,我们将集体效能感与社会规范区分开来,并发现了通过感知到的集体效能感产生的间接影响。低效能感条件下(与高效能感或控制条件相比)的参与者作为盟友感知到的集体效能感较低,这反过来又与较低的集体行动相关。我们讨论了实验研究中集体效能感的概念化及其对平等动员的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7eeb/12079007/4b2f957e038d/BJSO-64-0-g001.jpg

相似文献

5
Behavioural challenges of minorities: Social identity and role models.少数民族的行为挑战:社会认同与榜样作用。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 26;14(7):e0220010. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220010. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

7
A social identity model of pro-environmental action (SIMPEA).促进环保行为的社会认同模型 (SIMPEA)。
Psychol Rev. 2018 Mar;125(2):245-269. doi: 10.1037/rev0000090. Epub 2017 Dec 21.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验