Suppr超能文献

慢性病患者及其照顾者对在线瑜伽的接受度:定性研究

Acceptability of Online Yoga Among Individuals With Chronic Conditions and Their Caregivers: Qualitative Study.

作者信息

Portz Jennifer Dickman, Schmid Arlene, Fruhauf Christine, Fox Aimee, Van Puymbroeck Marieke, Sharp Julia, Leach Heather

机构信息

University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States.

Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Form Res. 2023 May 24;7:e39158. doi: 10.2196/39158.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The online delivery of yoga interventions rapidly expanded during the COVID-19 pandemic, and preliminary studies indicate that online yoga is feasible across multiple chronic conditions. However, few yoga studies provide synchronous online yoga sessions and rarely target the caregiving dyad. Online chronic disease management interventions have been evaluated across conditions, life spans, and diverse samples. However, the perceived acceptability of online yoga, including self-reported satisfaction and online delivery preferences, is underexplored among individuals with chronic conditions and their caregivers. Understanding user preferences is essential for successful and safe online yoga implementation.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to qualitatively examine the perceived acceptability of online yoga among individuals with chronic conditions and their caregivers who participated in an online dyadic intervention that merged yoga and self-management education to develop skills (MY-Skills) to manage persistent pain.

METHODS

We conducted a qualitative study among 9 dyads (>18 years of age; individuals experiencing persistent moderate pain) who participated in MY-Skills online during the COVID-19 pandemic. The intervention consisted of 16 online, synchronous yoga sessions over 8 weeks for both dyad members. After the completion of the intervention, participants (N=18) participated in semistructured telephone interviews for around 20 minutes, discussing their preferences, challenges, and recommendations for improved online delivery. Interviews were analyzed by using a rapid analytic approach.

RESULTS

MY-Skills participants were, on average, aged 62.7 (SD 19) years; were primarily women; were primarily White; and had a mean of 5.5 (SD 3) chronic conditions. Both participants and caregivers reported moderate pain severity scores (mean 6.02, SD 1.3) on the Brief Pain Inventory. The following three themes were identified related to online delivery: (1) participants indicated a preference for the intervention to be in person rather than online because they were distracted in the home setting, because they felt that in-person yoga would be more engaging, because the yoga therapist could physically correct positions, and because of safety concerns (eg, fear of falling); (2) participants indicated good acceptability of online MY-Skills delivery due to convenience, access, and comfort with being in their home; and (3) recommendations for improving online delivery highlighted a need for additional and accessible technical support.

CONCLUSIONS

Both individuals with chronic conditions and their caregivers find online yoga to be an acceptable intervention. Participants who preferred in-person yoga did so due to distractions in the home and group dynamics. Some participants preferred in-person corrections to ensure correct positioning, while others felt safe with verbal modifications in their homes. Convenience and access were the primary reasons for preferring online delivery. To improve online delivery, future yoga studies should include specific activities for fostering group engagement, enhancing safety protocols, and increasing technical support.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03440320; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03440320.

摘要

背景

在新冠疫情期间,瑜伽干预措施的在线提供迅速扩展,初步研究表明在线瑜伽在多种慢性病中是可行的。然而,很少有瑜伽研究提供同步在线瑜伽课程,并且很少针对照护二元组。在线慢性病管理干预措施已在各种疾病、不同寿命阶段和多样样本中进行了评估。然而,在慢性病患者及其照护者中,对在线瑜伽的感知可接受性,包括自我报告的满意度和在线授课偏好,尚未得到充分探索。了解用户偏好对于成功且安全地实施在线瑜伽至关重要。

目的

我们旨在定性研究慢性病患者及其照护者对在线瑜伽的感知可接受性,这些患者和照护者参与了一项在线二元干预,该干预融合了瑜伽和自我管理教育以培养管理持续性疼痛的技能(MY - Skills)。

方法

我们对9个二元组(年龄>18岁;经历持续性中度疼痛的个体)进行了一项定性研究,这些二元组在新冠疫情期间在线参与了MY - Skills。干预包括为二元组的两名成员在8周内进行16次在线同步瑜伽课程。干预结束后,参与者(N = 18)参加了约20分钟的半结构化电话访谈,讨论他们的偏好、挑战以及对改进在线授课的建议。访谈采用快速分析方法进行分析。

结果

MY - Skills参与者的平均年龄为62.7(标准差19)岁;主要为女性;主要是白人;平均患有5.5(标准差3)种慢性病。参与者和照护者在简短疼痛量表上报告的疼痛严重程度得分均为中度(平均6.02,标准差1.3)。确定了与在线授课相关的以下三个主题:(1)参与者表示更倾向于面对面而非在线干预,因为他们在家中会分心,因为他们觉得面对面瑜伽会更有吸引力,因为瑜伽治疗师可以亲自纠正姿势,以及出于安全担忧(例如,害怕摔倒);(2)由于便利性、可及性以及在家中的舒适感,参与者表示对在线MY - Skills授课具有良好的接受度;(3)对改进在线授课的建议强调需要额外且易于获取的技术支持。

结论

慢性病患者及其照护者都认为在线瑜伽是一种可接受的干预措施。更喜欢面对面瑜伽的参与者是因为家中分心和群体互动。一些参与者更喜欢面对面纠正以确保姿势正确,而另一些人则对在家中通过言语调整感到安全。便利性和可及性是更喜欢在线授课的主要原因。为了改进在线授课,未来的瑜伽研究应包括促进群体互动、加强安全协议和增加技术支持的具体活动。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03440320;https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03440320

相似文献

本文引用的文献

7
An overview of the qualitative descriptive design within nursing research.护理研究中的定性描述性设计概述。
J Res Nurs. 2020 Aug;25(5):443-455. doi: 10.1177/1744987119880234. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
8
Satisfaction with Online Versus In-Person Yoga During COVID-19.在 COVID-19 期间对线上瑜伽和线下瑜伽的满意度。
J Altern Complement Med. 2021 Oct;27(10):893-896. doi: 10.1089/acm.2021.0062. Epub 2021 Aug 2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验