Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
Department of Psychiatry, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2023;14(2):2209469. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2023.2209469.
Timely and effective interventions can alleviate or prevent the development of clinical symptomatology in trauma-exposed individuals. However, due to limited access to these interventions, and/or stigma around accessing mental health services, there is an unmet need. Internet-and mobile-based interventions may help to address this need. This review aims to (i) synthesise the evidence on feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of the 'PTSD Coach' intervention (both web-based and mobile applications) in trauma-exposed individuals; (ii) evaluate the quality of this research; and (iii) identify challenges and recommendations related to 'PTSD Coach' intervention delivery. Systematic database searches were conducted (PubMed/MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, PLoS, Web of Science, PTSDpubs, Scopus, and clinical trial databases). Review inclusion was based on predefined inclusion criteria, and study quality was assessed with the mixed methods appraisal and the risk-of-bias tools for randomised trials. Where feasible, meta-analytical pooling of intervention effects on posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) was conducted. Seventeen manuscripts reporting on 16 primary studies were included with the majority evaluating a self-managed PTSD Coach mobile application intervention. Most studies were conducted in higher-income countries and females were over-represented. For both platforms, satisfaction and perceived helpfulness were generally high but type of smart device operating system was identified as an influence. The pooled effect size in symptom severity in the intervention group compared to the comparison group was not significant (standardised mean difference = - 0.19) (95% CI - 0.41 to - 0.03, = .09). Heterogeneity was not significant ( = .14; I2 = 40%). No study was excluded based on quality assessment. Findings support the feasibility and acceptability of 'PTSD Coach' in trauma-exposed individuals. However, evidence on the effectiveness on PTSS remains limited. More research is still needed in low-middle-income countries, particularly those in which supported 'PTSD Coach' interventions are evaluated in larger and more diverse samples.
及时有效的干预措施可以减轻或预防创伤后个体出现临床症状。然而,由于获得这些干预措施的机会有限,以及(或)在获取心理健康服务方面存在耻辱感,因此存在未满足的需求。基于互联网和移动的干预措施可能有助于满足这一需求。本综述旨在:(i)综合创伤后个体使用“创伤后应激障碍教练”干预措施(包括基于网络的和移动应用程序)的可行性、可接受性和有效性证据;(ii)评估该研究的质量;(iii)确定与“创伤后应激障碍教练”干预措施实施相关的挑战和建议。系统地进行了数据库检索(PubMed/MEDLINE、PsycINFO、EMBASE、PLoS、Web of Science、PTSDpubs、Scopus 和临床试验数据库)。综述纳入基于预先确定的纳入标准,使用混合方法评估工具和随机试验偏倚风险工具评估研究质量。在可行的情况下,对创伤后应激症状(PTSS)的干预效果进行了荟萃分析。纳入了 17 篇报告 16 项主要研究的手稿,其中大多数研究评估了自我管理的 PTSD Coach 移动应用程序干预措施。大多数研究在高收入国家进行,女性参与者人数过多。对于这两个平台,满意度和感知有用性通常都很高,但智能设备操作系统类型被确定为一个影响因素。与对照组相比,干预组症状严重程度的汇总效应大小不显著(标准化均数差=-0.19)(95%CI-0.41 至-0.03,P=0.09)。异质性不显著(P=0.14;I2=40%)。没有根据质量评估排除任何研究。研究结果支持“创伤后应激障碍教练”在创伤后个体中的可行性和可接受性。然而,关于创伤后应激障碍症状的有效性证据仍然有限。在中低收入国家,特别是在更大、更多样化的样本中评估支持性“创伤后应激障碍教练”干预措施的国家,仍需要更多的研究。