Department of Physical Education, Jianghan University, Wuhan, China.
Department of International Culture Education, Chodang University, Wuan, Republic of Korea.
Eur J Pediatr. 2023 Aug;182(8):3587-3601. doi: 10.1007/s00431-023-05009-w. Epub 2023 May 25.
The physical and psychological benefits of physical activity are well established. However, there is no consensus regarding the effects of physical activity on children's academic performance in general and in specific subjects. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to identify forms of physical activity that are suitable for improving the physical activity levels and academic performance of children aged 12 years and under. The PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched. Included studies had to meet the following criteria: randomized controlled trials examining the effect of physical activity interventions on children's academic performance. Stata 15.1 software was used to conduct the meta-analysis. A total of 16 studies were included, and the results showed that the "physical activity + academic curriculum" format had a positive effect on children's academic performance. Physical activity had a stronger effect on math performance than on reading and spelling performance (SMD = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.30,1.19, P < 0.001). Conclusion: The impact of physical activity on children's academic performance varies based on the type of physical activity intervention, with "physical activity + academic curriculum" format having a better effect on academic performance. The effect of physical activity interventions on children's academic performance also varies by subject; the effect is strongest for math. Trial registration: Registration and protocol CRD42022363255. What is Known: • The physical and psychological benefits of physical activity are well established. • Previous meta-analyses have failed to demonstrate the impact of physical activity on the general and subject-specific academic performance of children aged 12 and under. What is New: • The PAAL form of physical activity has a better effect on the academic performance of children aged 12 and under. • The benefit of physical activity also varies by subject, with the greatest effect being observed for math.
身体活动对身心健康的益处已得到充分证实。然而,关于身体活动对儿童总体学业成绩和特定学科成绩的影响,目前尚无定论。我们进行了这项系统评价和荟萃分析,以确定适合提高 12 岁及以下儿童身体活动水平和学业成绩的身体活动形式。我们检索了 PubMed、Web of Science、Embase 和 Cochrane Library 数据库。纳入的研究必须符合以下标准:随机对照试验,考察身体活动干预对儿童学业成绩的影响。使用 Stata 15.1 软件进行荟萃分析。共纳入 16 项研究,结果表明“身体活动+学术课程”模式对儿童学业成绩有积极影响。身体活动对数学成绩的影响强于阅读和拼写成绩(SMD=0.75,95%CI:0.30,1.19,P<0.001)。结论:身体活动对儿童学业成绩的影响因身体活动干预类型而异,“身体活动+学术课程”模式对学业成绩的影响更好。身体活动干预对儿童学业成绩的影响也因科目而异;对数学的影响最强。试验注册:注册和方案 CRD42022363255。已知:• 身体活动对身心健康的益处已得到充分证实。• 之前的荟萃分析未能证明身体活动对 12 岁及以下儿童总体和特定学科学业成绩的影响。新发现:• PAAL 形式的身体活动对 12 岁及以下儿童的学业成绩有更好的影响。• 身体活动的益处也因科目而异,对数学的影响最大。