University of Illinois at Chicago.
Augusta University.
Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2020 May 25;32(3):140-149. doi: 10.1123/pes.2019-0224.
To examine effects of a 10-week after-school physical activity (PA) program on academic performance of 6- to 12-year-old African American children with behavior problems.
Participants were randomized to PA (n = 19) or sedentary attention control (n = 16) programs. Academic records, curriculum-based measures, and classroom observations were obtained at baseline, postintervention, and/or follow-up. Mixed models tested group × time interactions on academic records and curriculum-based measures. One-way analysis of variance or Kruskal-Wallis tested for differences in postintervention classroom observations.
Intent-to-treat analyses demonstrated a moderate effect within groups from baseline to postintervention on disciplinary referrals (PA: d = -0.47; attention control: d = -0.36) and a null moderate effect on academic assessments (PA: d = 0.11 to 0.36; attention control: d = 0.05 to 0.40). No significant group × time interactions emerged on direct academic assessments (all Ps ≥ .05, d = -0.23 to 0.26) or academic records (all Ps ≥ .05, d = -0.28 to 0.16). Classroom observations revealed that intervention participants were off-task due to moving at twice the rate of comparative classmates (F = 15.74, P < .001) and were off-task due to talking 33% more often (F = 1.39, P = .257).
Academic outcome improvements were small within and between groups and did not sustain at follow-up. Academic benefits of after-school PA programs for children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and/or disruptive behavior disorders were smaller than neurobiological, behavioral, and cognitive outcomes as previously reported.
研究 10 周课外体育活动(PA)计划对有行为问题的 6 至 12 岁非裔美国儿童学业成绩的影响。
参与者随机分配到 PA(n = 19)或久坐不动的注意力控制(n = 16)计划中。在基线、干预后和/或随访时获得学业记录、基于课程的测量和课堂观察。混合模型检验了组间的时间交互作用在学业记录和基于课程的测量上。单因素方差分析或 Kruskal-Wallis 检验用于检验干预后课堂观察的差异。
意向性治疗分析表明,在从基线到干预后的组内,纪律处分转介(PA:d = -0.47;注意力控制:d = -0.36)有中等程度的效果,而直接学术评估(PA:d = 0.11 至 0.36;注意力控制:d = 0.05 至 0.40)的效果为零。在直接学术评估(所有 P 值均≥0.05,d = -0.23 至 0.26)或学业记录(所有 P 值均≥0.05,d = -0.28 至 0.16)方面,没有出现显著的组间时间交互作用。课堂观察表明,干预组的学生因比对照组同学多动两倍而分神(F = 15.74,P <.001),因谈话频率高出 33%而分神(F = 1.39,P =.257)。
组内和组间的学业成绩提高幅度较小,且在随访时无法维持。与之前报道的神经生物学、行为和认知结果相比,课外 PA 计划对患有注意缺陷多动障碍和/或行为障碍的儿童的学业益处较小。