Durr Brandon J, Ballard Larry D, Knight Angela D, Seo Keun-Seok, Langston Vernon C, Thompson Alexis C, Shivley Jacob M, Brookshire W Cooper
Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS, United States.
Department of Pathobiology and Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS, United States.
Front Vet Sci. 2023 May 9;10:1178522. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1178522. eCollection 2023.
The objective of this study was to assess the use of breakpoints in antibiotic susceptibility testing among veterinary diagnostic laboratories in the United States and Canada. An eight-question survey was conducted via phone and email to determine how often laboratories use breakpoints consistent with published guidelines in wounds, lower urinary tract infections and upper urinary tract infections (pyelonephritis) involving , both in dogs and cats, for a total of 6 different hypothetical clinical scenarios. Nineteen veterinary diagnostic laboratories that perform antibiotic susceptibility testing on samples from dogs and cats in the United States or Canada and were accredited by the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians (AAVLD) responded to the survey between January 15th and September 15th, 2022. The overall response rate of laboratories that were not excluded for known lack of dog and cat antibiotic susceptibility testing was 19 of 44 laboratories. Of the 17 respondent laboratories that reported using minimal inhibitory concentration breakpoints, only four laboratories used breakpoints consistent with published guidelines in all six clinical scenarios included in the survey. Our results suggest that there is clinically important variation in what breakpoints laboratories use to determine antibiotic susceptibility, which is of antibiotic stewardship and clinical relevance. Using breakpoints that are too high, too low, or inappropriately reporting "not interpreted" as the interpretive category may result in inappropriate use of antibiotics.
本研究的目的是评估美国和加拿大兽医诊断实验室在抗生素敏感性测试中对断点的使用情况。通过电话和电子邮件进行了一项包含八个问题的调查,以确定实验室在涉及犬猫的伤口、下尿路感染和上尿路感染(肾盂肾炎)这六种不同假设临床场景中,使用与已发表指南一致的断点的频率。2022年1月15日至9月15日期间,19家在美国或加拿大对犬猫样本进行抗生素敏感性测试并获得美国兽医实验室诊断学家协会(AAVLD)认可的兽医诊断实验室对调查做出了回应。在未因已知缺乏犬猫抗生素敏感性测试而被排除的实验室中,总体回复率为44家实验室中的19家。在报告使用最低抑菌浓度断点的17家受访实验室中,只有四家实验室在调查涵盖的所有六种临床场景中使用了与已发表指南一致的断点。我们的结果表明,实验室在用于确定抗生素敏感性的断点方面存在具有临床重要性的差异,这与抗生素管理和临床相关性有关。使用过高、过低的断点或不恰当地将“无法解释”报告为解释类别可能会导致抗生素的不当使用。