Suppr超能文献

洞察问题解决中的认知过程追踪:运用广义相加模型和变点分析揭示重组过程

Tracing Cognitive Processes in Insight Problem Solving: Using GAMs and Change Point Analysis to Uncover Restructuring.

作者信息

Graf Mario, Danek Amory H, Vaci Nemanja, Bilalić Merim

机构信息

Institute of Psychology, University of Klagenfurt, 9020 Klagenfurt, Austria.

Department of Psychology, Heidelberg University, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

J Intell. 2023 May 3;11(5):86. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11050086.

Abstract

Insight problems are likely to trigger an initial, incorrect mental representation, which needs to be restructured in order to find the solution. Despite the widespread theoretical assumption that this restructuring process happens suddenly, leading to the typical "Aha!" experience, the evidence is inconclusive. Among the reasons for this lack of clarity is that many measures of insight rely solely on the solvers' subjective experience of the solution process. In our previous paper, we used matchstick arithmetic problems to demonstrate that it is possible to objectively trace problem-solving processes by combining eye movements with new analytical and statistical approaches. Specifically, we divided the problem-solving process into ten (relative) temporal phases to better capture possible small changes in problem representation. Here, we go a step further to demonstrate that classical statistical procedures, such as ANOVA, cannot capture sudden representational change processes, which are typical for insight problems. Only nonlinear statistical models, such as generalized additive (mixed) models (GAMs) and change points analysis, correctly identified the abrupt representational change. Additionally, we demonstrate that explicit hints reorient participants' focus in a qualitatively different manner, changing the dynamics of restructuring in insight problem solving. While insight problems may indeed require a sudden restructuring of the initial mental representation, more sophisticated analytical and statistical approaches are necessary to uncover their true nature.

摘要

顿悟问题很可能会引发一个初始的、错误的心理表征,为了找到解决方案,这个表征需要被重新构建。尽管普遍的理论假设认为这种重新构建过程会突然发生,从而导致典型的“啊哈!”体验,但证据并不确凿。造成这种不明确的原因之一是,许多顿悟的衡量标准仅仅依赖于解题者对解题过程的主观体验。在我们之前的论文中,我们使用火柴棍算术问题来证明,通过将眼动与新的分析和统计方法相结合,有可能客观地追踪解题过程。具体来说,我们将解题过程分为十个(相对)时间阶段,以便更好地捕捉问题表征中可能出现的微小变化。在这里,我们更进一步证明,诸如方差分析(ANOVA)等经典统计程序无法捕捉顿悟问题典型的突然表征变化过程。只有非线性统计模型,如广义相加(混合)模型(GAMs)和变化点分析,才能正确识别这种突然的表征变化。此外,我们证明明确的提示会以一种质的不同方式重新引导参与者的注意力,改变顿悟问题解决中重新构建过程的动态。虽然顿悟问题确实可能需要对初始心理表征进行突然的重新构建,但需要更复杂的分析和统计方法来揭示它们的真实本质。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/012d/10219327/78ca29067cff/jintelligence-11-00086-g009.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验