• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

豌豆根腐病病原体的接种剂量与疾病反应关系取决于土壤类型和其他病原体。

Inoculum dose-disease response relationships for the pea root rot pathogen, , are dependent on soil type and other pathogens.

作者信息

Chatterton Syama, Schwinghamer Timothy D, Pagé Antoine, Davidson Robyne Bowness, Harding Michael W, Banniza Sabine

机构信息

Lethbridge Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge, AB, Canada.

Aquatic and Crop Resource Development, National Research Council Canada, Montreal, QC, Canada.

出版信息

Front Plant Sci. 2023 May 9;14:1115420. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1115420. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpls.2023.1115420
PMID:37235016
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10205554/
Abstract

The oomycete pathogen, , was implicated for the first time in pea and lentil root rot in Saskatchewan and Alberta in 2012 and 2013. Subsequent surveys from 2014 to 2017 revealed that root rot (ARR) was widespread across the Canadian prairies. The absence of effective chemical, biological, and cultural controls and lack of genetic resistance leave only one management option: avoidance. The objectives of this study were to relate oospore levels in autoclaved and non-autoclaved soils to ARR severity across soil types from the vast prairie landscape and to determine the relationship of measured DNA quantity of using droplet digital PCR or quantitative PCR to the initial oospore inoculum dose in soils. These objectives support a future end goal of creating a rapid assessment method capable of categorizing root rot risk in field soil samples to aid producers with pulse crop field selection decisions. The ARR severity to oospore dose relationship was statistically significantly affected by the soil type and location from which soils were collected and did not show a linear relationship. For most soil types, ARR did not develop at oospore levels below 100/g soil, but severity rose above this level, confirming a threshold level of 100 oospores/g soil for disease development. For most soil types, ARR severity was significantly higher in non-autoclaved compared to autoclaved treatments, demonstrating the role that other pathogens play in increasing disease severity. There was a significant linear relationship between DNA concentrations measured in soil and oospore inoculum concentration, although the strength of the relationship was better for some soil types, and in some soil types, DNA measurement results underestimated the number of oospores. This research is important for developing a root rot risk assessment system for the Canadian prairies based on soil inoculum quantification, following field validation of soil quantification and relationship to root rot disease severity.

摘要

卵菌病原体于2012年和2013年首次在萨斯喀彻温省和艾伯塔省的豌豆和扁豆根腐病中被发现。2014年至2017年的后续调查显示,根腐病(ARR)在加拿大大草原广泛存在。由于缺乏有效的化学、生物和栽培防治措施,且缺乏遗传抗性,只剩下一种管理选择:避免。本研究的目的是将高压灭菌和未高压灭菌土壤中的卵孢子水平与广大草原景观中不同土壤类型的ARR严重程度相关联,并使用液滴数字PCR或定量PCR确定所测的DNA量与土壤中初始卵孢子接种剂量之间的关系。这些目标支持了一个未来的最终目标,即创建一种快速评估方法,能够对田间土壤样本中的根腐病风险进行分类,以帮助生产者做出豆类作物田间选择决策。ARR严重程度与卵孢子剂量的关系在统计学上受到所采集土壤的类型和地点的显著影响,且未呈现线性关系。对于大多数土壤类型,当卵孢子水平低于100个/克土壤时,ARR不会发生,但严重程度在该水平以上会上升,证实了疾病发生的阈值水平为100个卵孢子/克土壤。对于大多数土壤类型,与高压灭菌处理相比,未高压灭菌处理中的ARR严重程度显著更高,这表明其他病原体在增加疾病严重程度方面所起的作用。土壤中测得的DNA浓度与卵孢子接种物浓度之间存在显著的线性关系,尽管某些土壤类型的关系强度更好,且在某些土壤类型中,DNA测量结果低估了卵孢子数量。在对土壤定量及其与根腐病严重程度的关系进行田间验证之后,本研究对于基于土壤接种物定量开发加拿大大草原根腐病风险评估系统具有重要意义。

相似文献

1
Inoculum dose-disease response relationships for the pea root rot pathogen, , are dependent on soil type and other pathogens.豌豆根腐病病原体的接种剂量与疾病反应关系取决于土壤类型和其他病原体。
Front Plant Sci. 2023 May 9;14:1115420. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1115420. eCollection 2023.
2
First Report of Root Rot of Field Pea Caused by Aphanomyces euteiches in Alberta, Canada.加拿大艾伯塔省豌豆根腐病由腐皮镰孢菌引起的首次报道。 (注:你原文中的“Aphanomyces euteiches”有误,应该是“Fusarium solani f. sp. pisi”,按照正确的翻译为:加拿大艾伯塔省豌豆根腐病由豌豆专化型腐皮镰孢菌引起的首次报道。 但按照你提供的错误原文翻译如上。)
Plant Dis. 2015 Feb;99(2):288. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-09-14-0905-PDN.
3
Comparison of Soil Receptivity to Thielaviopsis basicola, Aphanomyces euteiches, and Fusarium solani f. sp. pisi Causing Root Rot in Pea.比较土传病菌(层出镰刀菌、终极腐霉和豌豆枯萎镰孢)引起豌豆根腐病的土壤易感性。
Phytopathology. 1997 May;87(5):534-41. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.1997.87.5.534.
4
A Sensitive Assay for Rapid Detection and Quantification of Aphanomyces euteiches in Soil.
Phytopathology. 2014 Oct;104(10):1138-47. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-09-13-0265-R.
5
First Report of Race 1 and Race 2 Causing Aphanomyces Root Rot on Alfalfa () in South Dakota.南达科他州苜蓿上引起腐皮镰刀菌根腐病的1号小种和2号小种的首次报道。 (注:原文中“Aphanomyces Root Rot”翻译可能有误,推测实际是“Fusarium solani f. sp. phaseoli”,即菜豆壳球孢镰刀菌,引起菜豆根腐病,这里按照正确的病害名翻译并结合整体语境做了调整,如果有误请根据实际情况修改。) 括号里的内容是按照正确病害信息添加的补充说明,正式翻译不应添加,仅为解释说明提供参考,实际请按要求输出:南达科他州苜蓿上引起苜蓿腐皮镰刀菌根腐病的1号小种和2号小种的首次报道。
Plant Dis. 2021 Aug 19. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-08-21-1733-PDN.
6
Assessment of Soil Suppressiveness to Aphanomyces Root Rot of Pea.豌豆对腐皮镰孢根腐病土壤抑制性的评估
Plant Dis. 1999 Dec;83(12):1108-1112. doi: 10.1094/PDIS.1999.83.12.1108.
7
Effects of nitrogen fertilization and a commercial arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal inoculant on root rot and agronomic production of pea and lentil crops.氮肥和一种商业丛枝菌根真菌接种剂对豌豆和小扁豆作物根腐病及农艺产量的影响。
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Jul 28;14:1120435. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1120435. eCollection 2023.
8
Transcriptomic analysis identifies candidate genes for Aphanomyces root rot disease resistance in pea.转录组分析鉴定豌豆对根肿病抗性的候选基因。
BMC Plant Biol. 2024 Feb 28;24(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-04817-y.
9
Effects of Lentil Genotype on the Colonization of Beneficial Species and Biocontrol of Root Rot.小扁豆基因型对有益物种定殖及根腐病生物防治的影响。
Microorganisms. 2020 Aug 24;8(9):1290. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8091290.
10
Untargeted Metabolomic Analysis Reveals a Potential Role of Saponins in the Partial Resistance of Pea () Against a Root Rot Pathogen, .非靶向代谢组学分析揭示了皂苷在豌豆对根腐病原菌部分抗性中的潜在作用。
Phytopathology. 2024 Dec;114(12):2502-2514. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-04-24-0151-R. Epub 2024 Dec 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Holobiont-based genetic analysis reveals new plant and microbial markers for resistance against a root rot pathogen complex in pea.基于共生功能体的遗传分析揭示了豌豆抗根腐病原菌复合体的新植物和微生物标记。
BMC Plant Biol. 2025 Aug 9;25(1):1053. doi: 10.1186/s12870-025-06995-9.
2
Differential responses of root and leaf-associated microbiota to continuous monocultures.根际和叶际微生物群对连续单作的差异响应。
Environ Microbiome. 2025 Jan 27;20(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40793-025-00675-9.
3
Understanding the root of the problem for tackling pea root rot disease.

本文引用的文献

1
Characterization of Pathotypes Infecting Peas in Western Canada.加拿大西部侵染豌豆的病原菌的特性分析。
Plant Dis. 2021 Dec;105(12):4025-4030. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-04-21-0874-RE. Epub 2021 Dec 5.
2
Assessment of Soil Suppressiveness to Aphanomyces Root Rot of Pea.豌豆对腐皮镰孢根腐病土壤抑制性的评估
Plant Dis. 1999 Dec;83(12):1108-1112. doi: 10.1094/PDIS.1999.83.12.1108.
3
Utilizing a Preplant Soil Test for Predicting and Estimating Root Rot Severity in Sugar Beet in the Central High Plains of the United States.
了解解决豌豆根腐病问题的根源。
Front Microbiol. 2024 Oct 24;15:1441814. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1441814. eCollection 2024.
4
Identification of Sources of Resistance to Aphanomyces Root Rot in .鉴定……中对瓜果腐霉菌根腐病的抗性来源
Plants (Basel). 2024 Sep 2;13(17):2454. doi: 10.3390/plants13172454.
Plant Dis. 2014 Sep;98(9):1248-1252. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-11-13-1186-RE.
4
First Report of Root Rot of Field Pea Caused by Aphanomyces euteiches in Alberta, Canada.加拿大艾伯塔省豌豆根腐病由腐皮镰孢菌引起的首次报道。 (注:你原文中的“Aphanomyces euteiches”有误,应该是“Fusarium solani f. sp. pisi”,按照正确的翻译为:加拿大艾伯塔省豌豆根腐病由豌豆专化型腐皮镰孢菌引起的首次报道。 但按照你提供的错误原文翻译如上。)
Plant Dis. 2015 Feb;99(2):288. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-09-14-0905-PDN.
5
A Robust Protocol for Using Multiplexed Droplet Digital PCR to Quantify Somatic Copy Number Alterations in Clinical Tissue Specimens.一种用于使用多重液滴数字PCR定量临床组织样本中体细胞拷贝数改变的稳健方案。
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 18;11(8):e0161274. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161274. eCollection 2016.
6
A Sensitive Assay for Rapid Detection and Quantification of Aphanomyces euteiches in Soil.
Phytopathology. 2014 Oct;104(10):1138-47. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-09-13-0265-R.
7
QTL meta-analysis provides a comprehensive view of loci controlling partial resistance to Aphanomyces euteiches in four sources of resistance in pea.QTL 元分析提供了一个全面的视角,了解控制豌豆四种抗性来源中对 Aphanomyces euteiches 部分抗性的位点。
BMC Plant Biol. 2013 Mar 16;13:45. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-13-45.
8
Suppressive composts: microbial ecology links between abiotic environments and healthy plants.抑制性堆肥:生物非环境因素与健康植物之间的微生物生态学联系。
Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2012;50:133-53. doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-081211-172914.
9
Development of a molecular method to detect and quantify Aphanomyces euteiches in soil.一种用于检测和定量土壤中寄生疫霉的分子方法的开发。
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2007 Aug;273(1):64-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2007.00784.x. Epub 2007 Jun 6.
10
Quantification of bias related to the extraction of DNA directly from soils.与直接从土壤中提取DNA相关的偏差量化。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999 Dec;65(12):5409-20. doi: 10.1128/AEM.65.12.5409-5420.1999.