Rabenstein Andrea, Rahofer Anna, Vukas Jochen, Rieder Benedikt, Störzenhofecker Kristin, Stoll Yvonne, Burgmann Nestor, Pieper Elke, Laux Peter, Luch Andreas, Rüther Tobias, Mallock-Ohnesorg Nadja
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU), Nussbaumstraße 7, 80336 Munich, Germany.
Department of Social Services, Katholische Hochschule Nordrhein-Westfalen, Standort Köln, Wörthstraße 10, 50668 Cologne, Germany.
Toxics. 2023 May 5;11(5):434. doi: 10.3390/toxics11050434.
Many different nicotine delivery products, such as e-cigarettes (e-cigs) or heated tobacco products (HTPs), are available on the market. To better understand these products, it is crucial to learn how consumers use them and how much nicotine they deliver. Therefore, a pod e-cig, an HTP, and a conventional cigarette (CC) were each used by 15 experienced users of the respective product category for 90 min without special use instructions ("ad libitum"). Sessions were video recorded to analyze usage patterns and puff topography. At defined time points, blood was sampled to determine nicotine concentrations, and subjective effects were inquired about using questionnaires. During the study period, the CC and HTP groups averaged the same number of consumption units (both 4.2 units). In the pod e-cig group, the highest number of puffs was taken (pod e-cig 71.9; HTP: 52.2; CC: 42.3 puffs) with the most extended mean puff duration (pod e-cig: 2.8 s; HTP: 1.9 s; CC: 1.8 s). Pod e-cigs were predominantly used with single puffs or in short clusters of 2-5 puffs. The maximum plasma nicotine concentration was highest for CCs, followed by HTPs, and then pod e-cigs with 24.0, 17.7, and 8.0 ng/mL, respectively. Craving was reduced by all products. The results suggest that the high nicotine delivery known for tobacco-containing products (CCs and HTPs) may not be needed for non-tobacco-containing products (pod e-cigs) to satisfy cravings in experienced users.
市场上有许多不同的尼古丁递送产品,如电子烟或加热烟草制品。为了更好地了解这些产品,了解消费者如何使用它们以及它们递送多少尼古丁至关重要。因此,15名各自产品类别的有经验用户分别使用了一种烟弹式电子烟、一种加热烟草制品和一支传统香烟90分钟,且没有特殊使用说明(“随意使用”)。对使用过程进行了录像,以分析使用模式和抽吸特征。在规定的时间点采集血液样本以测定尼古丁浓度,并通过问卷调查询问主观感受。在研究期间,传统香烟组和加热烟草制品组的平均消费单位数量相同(均为4.2个单位)。在烟弹式电子烟组中,抽吸次数最多(烟弹式电子烟:71.9次;加热烟草制品:52.2次;传统香烟:42.3次),平均抽吸持续时间最长(烟弹式电子烟:2.8秒;加热烟草制品:1.9秒;传统香烟:1.8秒)。烟弹式电子烟主要是单次抽吸或2 - 5次的短簇抽吸。血浆尼古丁浓度最高值在传统香烟中最高,其次是加热烟草制品,然后是烟弹式电子烟,分别为24.0、17.7和8.0 ng/mL。所有产品都能减轻烟瘾。结果表明,对于有经验的用户来说,不含烟草的产品(烟弹式电子烟)在满足烟瘾方面可能不需要含烟草的产品(传统香烟和加热烟草制品)所具有的高尼古丁递送量。