• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Residents Vote! A Framework and Toolkit to Improve Resident Voting Rates.居民投票!提高居民投票率的框架与工具包。
J Grad Med Educ. 2025 Feb;17(1):96-100. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-24-00509.1. Epub 2025 Feb 14.
2
Examining Pediatric Residency Voting Practices.考察儿科住院医师投票实践。
South Med J. 2021 Jan;114(1):13-16. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001191.
3
Voting Trends Among Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Trainees.耳鼻咽喉头颈外科住院医师的投票趋势
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2025 Feb 22;10(1):e70103. doi: 10.1002/lio2.70103. eCollection 2025 Feb.
4
Emergency Absentee Voting for Hospitalized Patients and Voting During COVID-19: A 50-State Study.紧急情况下为住院患者提供缺席投票和在 COVID-19 期间投票:一项 50 个州的研究。
West J Emerg Med. 2021 Jul 15;22(4):1000-1009. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2021.4.50884.
5
Political Priorities, Voting, and Political Action Committee Engagement of Emergency Medicine Trainees: A National Survey.急诊医学住院医师的政治优先事项、投票和政治行动委员会参与情况:一项全国性调查。
West J Emerg Med. 2023 May 5;24(3):469-478. doi: 10.5811/westjem.59351.
6
Increasing Voter Participation Through Health Care-Based Voter Registration.通过医疗保健为选民登记提高选民参与度。
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Jun 7;5(6):e241563. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.1563.
7
Emergency Patient Voting Initiative in a Community Hospital During a Global Pandemic:: Lessons and a Call-to-Action for Expanded Voter Access.全球大流行期间社区医院的急诊患者投票倡议:扩大选民投票机会的经验教训与行动呼吁
Dela J Public Health. 2021 Jan 21;7(1):76-77. doi: 10.32481/djph.2021.01.015. eCollection 2021 Jan.
8
The Healthy Democracy Kit: design, implementation, uptake, and impact of a novel voter registration toolkit for healthcare settings.健康民主工具包:一种新型医疗环境选民登记工具包的设计、实施、采用和影响。
BMC Public Health. 2023 May 26;23(1):962. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15800-x.
9
Analysis of Ohio Nurses' Voting Behaviors 2020-2023.2020 - 2023年俄亥俄州护士投票行为分析
Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2025 May;26(2):89-96. doi: 10.1177/15271544241298259. Epub 2024 Nov 11.
10
Attitudes Toward Advocacy Do Not Match Actions: A Cross-sectional Survey of Residents and Fellows.对宣传的态度与行动不符:住院医师和研究员的横断面调查
R I Med J (2013). 2019 Apr 1;102(3):34-37.

本文引用的文献

1
Loper Bright Enterprises v Raimondo: Impact on the Environment.洛珀·布莱特企业公司诉雷蒙多案:对环境的影响
Wilderness Environ Med. 2024 Sep;35(3):255-256. doi: 10.1177/10806032241271617.
2
Trainee-Led Intervention to Motivate Resident Physician Voter Registration.由实习生主导的激励住院医师进行选民登记的干预措施。
JAMA Intern Med. 2024 Feb 1;184(2):216-218. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.6436.
3
Political Priorities, Voting, and Political Action Committee Engagement of Emergency Medicine Trainees: A National Survey.急诊医学住院医师的政治优先事项、投票和政治行动委员会参与情况:一项全国性调查。
West J Emerg Med. 2023 May 5;24(3):469-478. doi: 10.5811/westjem.59351.
4
The Healthy Democracy Kit: design, implementation, uptake, and impact of a novel voter registration toolkit for healthcare settings.健康民主工具包:一种新型医疗环境选民登记工具包的设计、实施、采用和影响。
BMC Public Health. 2023 May 26;23(1):962. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15800-x.
5
The DoCTRINE Guidelines: Defined Criteria To Report INnovations in Education.《DoCTRINE 指南:教育创新报告的定义标准》。
Acad Med. 2022 May 1;97(5):689-695. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004634. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
6
Analysis of Reported Voting Behaviors of US Physicians, 2000-2020.分析 2000-2020 年美国医生的投票行为报告
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jan 4;5(1):e2142527. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.42527.
7
Political Advocacy from Plastic Surgery Trainees in the United States.美国整形外科住院医师的政治宣传活动。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021 May 21;9(5):e3590. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003590. eCollection 2021 May.
8
Voting Behavior of Physicians and Healthcare Professionals.医生和医疗保健专业人员的投票行为
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Apr;36(4):1169-1171. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06461-2. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
9
Examining Pediatric Residency Voting Practices.考察儿科住院医师投票实践。
South Med J. 2021 Jan;114(1):13-16. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001191.
10
Trends in Physician Voting Practices in California, New York, and Texas, 2006-2018.2006-2018 年加利福尼亚州、纽约州和得克萨斯州医生投票行为趋势。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Mar 1;181(3):383-385. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.6887.

居民投票!提高居民投票率的框架与工具包。

Residents Vote! A Framework and Toolkit to Improve Resident Voting Rates.

作者信息

Goyal Nikhil, Vohra Taher T, Champagne Samuel

机构信息

at the time of writing was Senior Staff Physician, Departments of Emergency Medicine and Internal Medicine, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, Michigan, USA, and is now Senior Vice President, Accreditation, Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

is Vice Chair Education, Department of Emergency Medicine, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, Michigan, USA.

出版信息

J Grad Med Educ. 2025 Feb;17(1):96-100. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-24-00509.1. Epub 2025 Feb 14.

DOI:10.4300/JGME-D-24-00509.1
PMID:39980964
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11838051/
Abstract

Elections substantially impact health care, yet physicians vote less frequently compared to the general population. Engaging residents and fellows in elections, during training when professional identities are formed, may improve physician voting rates. To examine the feasibility and acceptability of a centralized, institution-wide approach to improve graduate medical education (GME) trainee awareness, registration, and participation in the electoral process. Our framework was implemented in academic year 2023-2024, leading up to the 2024 Michigan presidential primary election. It included: voter registration instruction during resident orientation; emails with election deadlines and nonpartisan voting information; distribution of wearable buttons displaying QR codes linking to information on voter registration, early voting, and mail-in ballots; and informational sessions with legislative experts. We created an open-access GME toolkit for other institutions. We measured trainee voting rates using a single text message question on election day. Of 1041 trainees, 115 (11%) attended 4 informational sessions; informal feedback was positive. One hundred twenty-three of 826 trainees (15%) responded to the text message question: 35 of 81 (43%) eligible voters reported having voted or planning to do so that day (statewide rate=23%). No additional funding was required. The institutional GME office provided support for operationalization and wearable buttons. Henry Ford Health Government Affairs supported the informational sessions (held during routine didactic time). A series of interventions to improve GME trainees' participation in elections appeared to enhance participation in a primary election with low effort and apparent acceptability. An online toolkit with reference data, tips, and tools was created to allow others to replicate this effort.

摘要

选举对医疗保健有重大影响,但与普通人群相比,医生投票的频率较低。在培训期间,当职业身份形成时,让住院医师和研究员参与选举,可能会提高医生的投票率。为了检验一种集中的、全机构范围的方法在提高研究生医学教育(GME)学员对选举过程的认识、登记和参与方面的可行性和可接受性。我们的框架在2023 - 2024学年实施,直至2024年密歇根州总统初选。它包括:在住院医师入职培训期间进行选民登记指导;发送包含选举截止日期和无党派投票信息的电子邮件;分发带有二维码的可穿戴纽扣,二维码链接到选民登记、提前投票和邮寄选票的信息;以及与立法专家举办信息交流会。我们为其他机构创建了一个开放获取的GME工具包。我们在选举日通过一个单一的短信问题来测量学员的投票率。在1041名学员中,115人(11%)参加了4次信息交流会;非正式反馈是积极的。826名学员中的123人(15%)回复了短信问题:81名合格选民中的35人(43%)报告当天已经投票或计划投票(全州投票率 = 23%)。无需额外资金。机构GME办公室为实施和可穿戴纽扣提供了支持。亨利·福特健康政府事务部支持了信息交流会(在常规教学时间举行)。一系列旨在提高GME学员参与选举的干预措施似乎以低投入和明显的可接受性提高了在初选中的参与度。创建了一个带有参考数据、提示和工具的在线工具包,以便其他人能够复制这一努力。