Herman J M, Homesley H D, Dignan M B
JAMA. 1986 Aug 1;256(5):601-3.
Several recent case series have called attention to a possible association between previous hysterectomy and the subsequent development of vaginal cancer. To study this relationship, we compared 49 patients with vaginal cancer with 49 controls matched for age, race, and prior cervical dysplasia or neoplasia. Patients and controls were alike in terms of exposure to estrogens. Twenty-four patients (49%) had had prior hysterectomies, of which 13 (27%) were for benign disease. Similarly, 24 controls had a history of a hysterectomy. The matched-pairs odds ratio relating prior hysterectomy to vaginal cancer was 1.00 based on these data, with a 95% confidence interval of 0.47 to 2.12. In the subsample of women without a history of cervical disease, a similar odds ratio appeared. Although the study sample size did not permit exclusion of a twofold increase in risk, the statistical power to detect an actual odds ratio of 2.5 is 76%. At this level of statistical power, our data suggest that hysterectomy has a low probability of being a risk factor for vaginal cancer when age and cervical disease are controlled for. In the absence of such a relationship, screening for vaginal cancer does not appear to be necessary for women who have had a hysterectomy for benign disease.
最近的几个病例系列研究已引起人们对既往子宫切除术与随后发生阴道癌之间可能存在关联的关注。为研究这种关系,我们将49例阴道癌患者与49例年龄、种族及既往宫颈发育异常或肿瘤形成情况相匹配的对照进行了比较。患者和对照在雌激素暴露方面相似。24例患者(49%)曾接受过子宫切除术,其中13例(27%)是因良性疾病而切除。同样,24例对照有子宫切除史。基于这些数据,既往子宫切除术与阴道癌相关的配对比值比为1.00,95%置信区间为0.47至2.12。在无宫颈疾病史的女性亚组中,出现了类似的比值比。尽管研究样本量不允许排除风险增加两倍的情况,但检测实际比值比为2.5时的统计效能为76%。在这个统计效能水平上,我们的数据表明,在控制年龄和宫颈疾病的情况下,子宫切除术成为阴道癌风险因素的可能性较低。若不存在这种关系,对于因良性疾病接受子宫切除术的女性,似乎没有必要进行阴道癌筛查。