Fetters M D, Fischer G, Reed B D
Department of Family Practice, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 48109-0708, USA.
JAMA. 1996 Mar 27;275(12):940-7.
Using literature review, we assessed (1) Papanicolaou smear screening recommendations after hysterectomy for benign disease, (2) total hysterectomy for benign disease as a risk for vaginal dysplasia or carcinoma, and (3) effectiveness of screening for vaginal carcinoma after total hysterectomy for benign disease.
We considered (1) organizations' recommendations about screening, (2) references from major textbooks of gynecology, and (3) MEDLINE searches of English-language studies published from 1966 through 1995 using the search strategy (hysterectomy and vaginal smears) or (vaginal smears and vaginal neoplasms).
Published or verbal confirmations of screening recommendations were eligible. Criteria for assessing risk of vaginal dysplasia or carcinoma included original research, documented reports of hysterectomy as an exposure, and evidence of preinvasive vaginal disease or vaginal carcinoma outcomes. We sought data assessing burden of suffering, screening efficacy, and effectiveness of early detection.
Descriptive and analytic data from each study were abstracted.
Screening recommendations were categorized by the organizations' positions: two opposed screening, two supported screening, and six lacked specific guidelines. Data on the risk between total hysterectomy for benign disease and subsequent vaginal carcinoma were organized by study design (three case control, two cohort, and 13 case series) and described. Data on screening effectiveness were organized to address the criteria advocated by the US Preventive Services Task Force.
There are conflicting guidelines on screening after hysterectomy and conflicting data on the risk of vaginal carcinoma after total hysterectomy for benign disease, though the best-designed research suggests no association. There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine vaginal smear screening in women after total hysterectomy for benign disease.
通过文献综述,我们评估了(1)良性疾病子宫切除术后的巴氏涂片筛查建议;(2)良性疾病全子宫切除术作为阴道发育异常或癌的风险;(3)良性疾病全子宫切除术后阴道癌筛查的有效性。
我们考虑了(1)各组织关于筛查的建议;(2)妇科主要教科书的参考文献;(3)使用检索策略(子宫切除术和阴道涂片)或(阴道涂片和阴道肿瘤)对1966年至1995年发表的英文研究进行的MEDLINE检索。
已发表或经口头确认的筛查建议符合要求。评估阴道发育异常或癌风险的标准包括原始研究、记录的子宫切除术作为暴露因素的报告,以及侵袭前阴道疾病或阴道癌结局的证据。我们寻求评估痛苦负担、筛查效果和早期检测有效性的数据。
提取每项研究的描述性和分析性数据。
筛查建议按各组织的立场分类:两个反对筛查,两个支持筛查,六个缺乏具体指南。关于良性疾病全子宫切除术与随后阴道癌之间风险的数据按研究设计(三个病例对照、两个队列和13个病例系列)进行整理并描述。关于筛查有效性的数据按美国预防服务工作组倡导的标准进行整理。
子宫切除术后的筛查指南存在冲突,良性疾病全子宫切除术后阴道癌风险的数据也相互矛盾,尽管设计最佳的研究表明两者无关联。没有足够的证据推荐对良性疾病全子宫切除术后的女性进行常规阴道涂片筛查。