Stoyanova Kristina, Stoyanov Drozdstoy, Dzhambov Angel M
Research Institute at Medical University of Plovdiv, Research Group "Translational and Computational Neuroscience", Strategic Research and Innovation Program for Development of MU-Plovdiv, Medical University of Plovdiv, 4002 Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Department of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology, Medical University of Plovdiv, 4002 Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Brain Sci. 2023 May 19;13(5):821. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13050821.
The earliest critical context of the pandemic, preceding the first real epidemiological wave of contagion in Bulgaria, was examined using a socio-affective perspective. A retrospective and agnostic analytical approach was adopted. Our goal was to identify traits and trends that explain public health support (PHS) of Bulgarians during the first two months of the declared state of emergency. We investigated a set of variables with a unified method within an international scientific network named the International Collaboration on Social & Moral Psychology of COVID-19 (ICSMP) in April and May 2020. A total of 733 Bulgarians participated in the study (67.3% females), with an average age of 31.8 years (SD = 11.66). Conspiracy Theories Beliefs were a significant predictor of lower PHS. Psychological Well-Being was significantly associated with Physical Contact and Anti-Corona Policy Support. Physical Contact was significantly predicted by fewer Conspiracy Theories Beliefs, higher Collective Narcissism, Open-mindedness, higher Trait Self-Control, Moral Identity, Risk Perception and Psychological Well-Being. Physical Hygiene compliance was predicted by fewer Conspiracy Theories Beliefs, Collective Narcissism, Morality-as-Cooperation, Moral Identity and Psychological Well-Being. The results revealed two polar trends of support and non-support of public health policies. The contribution of this study is in providing evidence for the affective polarization and phenomenology of (non)precarity during the outbreak of the pandemic.
在保加利亚首次出现真正的疫情传播浪潮之前,我们从社会情感视角审视了疫情初期的关键背景。我们采用了回顾性和无偏见的分析方法。我们的目标是确定在宣布紧急状态的头两个月里,能够解释保加利亚人对公共卫生支持情况的特征和趋势。2020年4月和5月,我们在一个名为“COVID-19社会与道德心理学国际合作”(ICSMP)的国际科学网络内,用统一的方法对一组变量进行了调查。共有733名保加利亚人参与了这项研究(女性占67.3%),平均年龄为31.8岁(标准差 = 11.66)。阴谋论信念是公共卫生支持度较低的一个重要预测因素。心理健康与身体接触及支持抗疫政策显著相关。阴谋论信念越少、集体自恋程度越高、思想越开放、特质自我控制能力越强、道德认同度越高、风险认知越高以及心理健康状况越好,对身体接触的预测就越显著。阴谋论信念越少、集体自恋程度越低、道德即合作的观念越强、道德认同度越高以及心理健康状况越好,对遵守身体卫生的预测就越显著。研究结果揭示了对公共卫生政策支持与不支持的两种极端趋势。本研究的贡献在于为疫情爆发期间(不)不稳定状态的情感两极分化和现象学提供了证据。