Center for the Advancement of Team Science, Analytics, and Systems Thinking in Health Services and Implementation Science Research (CATALYST), College of Medicine, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43202, USA.
National Registry of Emergency Medical Technicians, Columbus, OH 43223, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 May 18;20(10):5861. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20105861.
Emergency Medical Services (EMS) clinicians provide patient care within a high-stakes, unpredictable, and complex work environment in which conflict is inevitable. Our objective was to explore the extent to which added stressors of the pandemic exacerbated EMS workplace conflict. We administered our survey to a sample of U.S. nationally certified EMS clinicians during the COVID-19 pandemic in April 2022. Out of 1881 respondents, 46% ( = 857) experienced conflict and 79% ( = 674) provided free-text descriptions of their experience. The responses were analyzed for themes using qualitative content analysis, and they were then sorted into codes using word unit sets. Code counts, frequencies, and rankings were tabulated, enabling quantitative comparisons of the codes. Of the fifteen codes to emerge, stress (a precursor of burnout) and burnout-related fatigue were the key factors contributing to EMS workplace conflict. We mapped our codes to a conceptual model guided by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) report on using a systems approach to address clinician burnout and professional well-being to explore implications for addressing conflict within that framework. Factors attributed to conflict mapped to all levels of the NASEM model, lending empirical legitimacy to a broad systems approach to fostering worker well-being. Our findings lead us to propose that active surveillance (enhanced management information and feedback systems) of frontline clinicians' experiences during public health emergencies could increase the effectiveness of regulations and policies across the healthcare system. Ideally, the contributions of the occupational health discipline would become a mainstay of a sustained response to promote ongoing worker well-being. The maintenance of a robust EMS workforce, and by extension the health professionals in its operational sphere, is unquestionably essential to our preparedness for the likelihood that pandemic threats may become more commonplace.
紧急医疗服务(EMS)临床医生在高风险、不可预测和复杂的工作环境中提供患者护理,在这种环境中,冲突是不可避免的。我们的目的是探讨大流行期间增加的压力源在多大程度上加剧了 EMS 工作场所的冲突。我们在 2022 年 4 月 COVID-19 大流行期间向美国全国认证的 EMS 临床医生样本发放了我们的调查。在 1881 名受访者中,有 46%(=857)经历过冲突,79%(=674)提供了他们经历的自由文本描述。使用定性内容分析对这些回复进行了主题分析,然后使用单词单元集将它们分类为代码。对代码进行计数、频率和排名,以便对代码进行定量比较。在所出现的 15 个代码中,压力(倦怠的前兆)和与倦怠相关的疲劳是导致 EMS 工作场所冲突的关键因素。我们根据美国国家科学院、工程院和医学院(NASEM)关于使用系统方法解决临床医生倦怠和职业健康的报告中提出的概念模型,将我们的代码映射出来,以探索在该框架内解决冲突的影响。归因于冲突的因素映射到 NASEM 模型的所有层面,为促进工人福利的广泛系统方法提供了经验合法性。我们的研究结果使我们提出,在公共卫生紧急情况下对一线临床医生的经验进行主动监测(增强管理信息和反馈系统)可以提高整个医疗保健系统法规和政策的有效性。理想情况下,职业健康学科的贡献将成为持续应对的支柱,以促进工人的持续福利。维持一个强大的 EMS 劳动力,以及扩展其运营领域的卫生专业人员,对于我们应对大流行威胁可能变得更加普遍的可能性的准备工作无疑是至关重要的。