Department of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Frank H. Netter MD School of Medicine, Hamden, CT.
J Pediatr. 2023 Sep;260:113519. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2023.113519. Epub 2023 May 26.
To identify barriers and facilitators of evaluating children exposed to caregiver intimate partner violence (IPV) and develop a strategy to optimize the evaluation.
Using the EPIS (Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment) framework, we conducted qualitative interviews of 49 stakeholders, including emergency department clinicians (n = 18), child abuse pediatricians (n = 15), child protective services staff (n = 12), and caregivers who experienced IPV (n = 4), and reviewed meeting minutes of a family violence community advisory board (CAB). Researchers coded and analyzed interviews and CAB minutes using the constant comparative method of grounded theory. Codes were expanded and revised until a final structure emerged.
Four themes emerged: (1) benefits of evaluation, including the opportunity to assess children for physical abuse and to engage caregivers; (2) barriers, including limited evidence about the risk of abuse in these children, burdening a resource-limited system, and the complexity of IPV; (3) facilitators, including collaboration between medical and IPV providers; and (4) recommendations for trauma- and violence-informed care (TVIC) in which a child's evaluation is leveraged to link caregivers with an IPV advocate to address the caregiver's needs.
Routine evaluation of IPV-exposed children may lead to the detection of physical abuse and linkage to services for the child and the caregiver. Collaboration, improved data on the risk of child physical abuse in the context of IPV and implementation of TVIC may improve outcomes for families experiencing IPV.
确定评估受照料者亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)影响的儿童的障碍和促进因素,并制定一项优化评估的策略。
使用 EPIS(探索、准备、实施和维持)框架,我们对 49 名利益相关者进行了定性访谈,包括急诊医生(n=18)、儿童虐待儿科医生(n=15)、儿童保护服务人员(n=12)和经历过 IPV 的照顾者(n=4),并审查了家庭暴力社区咨询委员会(CAB)的会议记录。研究人员使用扎根理论的不断比较方法对访谈和 CAB 记录进行编码和分析。对代码进行扩展和修订,直到出现最终结构。
出现了四个主题:(1)评估的好处,包括评估儿童身体虐待和接触照顾者的机会;(2)障碍,包括有关这些儿童受虐待风险的证据有限、给资源有限的系统带来负担以及 IPV 的复杂性;(3)促进因素,包括医疗和 IPV 提供者之间的合作;以及(4)创伤和暴力知情护理(TVIC)的建议,其中孩子的评估被用来将照顾者与 IPV 倡导者联系起来,以满足照顾者的需求。
对 IPV 暴露儿童进行常规评估可能会导致发现身体虐待,并为儿童和照顾者提供服务。合作、提高有关 IPV 背景下儿童身体虐待风险的数据以及实施 TVIC 可能会改善遭受 IPV 的家庭的结果。