• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Acceptability and feasibility of trauma- and violence-informed care for intimate partner violence.创伤知情和暴力知情护理在亲密伴侣暴力中的可接受性和可行性。
Child Abuse Negl. 2024 Nov;157:107068. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.107068. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
2
Evaluation of Children after Caregiver Intimate Partner Violence: A Qualitative Study of Barriers, Facilitators, and Trauma- and Violence-Informed Care.照顾者亲密伴侣暴力后儿童评估:障碍、促进因素和创伤与暴力知情护理的定性研究。
J Pediatr. 2023 Sep;260:113519. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2023.113519. Epub 2023 May 26.
3
Telemedicine and virtual healthcare for survivors of sexual assault and intimate partner violence: A qualitative study.远程医疗和虚拟医疗在性侵和亲密伴侣暴力幸存者中的应用:一项定性研究。
Womens Health (Lond). 2024 Jan-Dec;20:17455057241252958. doi: 10.1177/17455057241252958.
4
Healthcare provider experiences interacting with survivors of intimate partner violence: a qualitative study to inform survivor-centered approaches.医疗保健提供者与亲密伴侣暴力幸存者互动的体验:一项定性研究,旨在为以幸存者为中心的方法提供信息。
BMC Womens Health. 2023 Nov 8;23(1):584. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02700-w.
5
Frequency of injuries in a voluntary program evaluating young children exposed to intimate partner violence.自愿参与项目评估遭受亲密伴侣暴力的幼儿的受伤频率。
Child Abuse Negl. 2023 Oct;144:106385. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2023.106385. Epub 2023 Aug 2.
6
Intimate Partner Violence Survivors' Reports of Their Children's Exposure to Companion Animal Maltreatment: A Qualitative Study.亲密伴侣暴力幸存者报告其子女遭受伴侣动物虐待的情况:一项定性研究。
J Interpers Violence. 2019 Jul;34(13):2627-2652. doi: 10.1177/0886260516689775. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
7
Lived experiences of intimate partner violence survivors during pregnancy and who had spontaneous abortions: A phenomenological study to inform survivor-centered strategies.孕期遭受亲密伴侣暴力且经历自然流产的幸存者的生活经历:一项为以幸存者为中心的策略提供信息的现象学研究。
Womens Health (Lond). 2024 Jan-Dec;20:17455057241305069. doi: 10.1177/17455057241305069.
8
Impact of Intimate Partner Violence on Children.亲密伴侣暴力对儿童的影响。
Pediatr Clin North Am. 2025 Jun;72(3):509-523. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2024.12.005. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
9
Violence against children and intimate partner violence against women: overlap and common contributing factors among caregiver-adolescent dyads.针对儿童的暴力行为和针对妇女的亲密伴侣暴力行为:照顾者-青少年对子代中的重叠和共同促成因素。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jan 29;20(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-8115-0.
10
Development and Evaluation of a Community Advisory Board for Family Violence.家庭暴力社区咨询委员会的发展与评估。
Violence Vict. 2024 Jun 1;39(2):189-203. doi: 10.1891/VV-2023-0002.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Intimate Partner Violence on Children.亲密伴侣暴力对儿童的影响。
Pediatr Clin North Am. 2025 Jun;72(3):509-523. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2024.12.005. Epub 2025 Feb 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and Evaluation of a Community Advisory Board for Family Violence.家庭暴力社区咨询委员会的发展与评估。
Violence Vict. 2024 Jun 1;39(2):189-203. doi: 10.1891/VV-2023-0002.
2
Interventions that prevent or respond to intimate partner violence against women and violence against children: a systematic review.预防或应对针对妇女的亲密伴侣暴力和针对儿童的暴力的干预措施:系统评价。
Lancet Public Health. 2024 May;9(5):e326-e338. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(24)00048-3.
3
Frequency of injuries in a voluntary program evaluating young children exposed to intimate partner violence.自愿参与项目评估遭受亲密伴侣暴力的幼儿的受伤频率。
Child Abuse Negl. 2023 Oct;144:106385. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2023.106385. Epub 2023 Aug 2.
4
Intimate Partner Violence: Role of the Pediatrician.亲密伴侣暴力:儿科医生的角色。
Pediatrics. 2023 Jul 1;152(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2023-062509.
5
Evaluation of Children after Caregiver Intimate Partner Violence: A Qualitative Study of Barriers, Facilitators, and Trauma- and Violence-Informed Care.照顾者亲密伴侣暴力后儿童评估:障碍、促进因素和创伤与暴力知情护理的定性研究。
J Pediatr. 2023 Sep;260:113519. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2023.113519. Epub 2023 May 26.
6
Child Maltreatment and Intimate Partner Violence in Mental Health Settings.儿童虐待和心理健康环境中的亲密伴侣暴力。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 25;19(23):15672. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315672.
7
The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback.基于用户反馈的更新的实施研究综合框架。
Implement Sci. 2022 Oct 29;17(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01245-0.
8
Trauma- and Violence-Informed Care: Orienting Intimate Partner Violence Interventions to Equity.创伤与暴力知情护理:将亲密伴侣暴力干预措施导向公平
Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2022;9(4):233-244. doi: 10.1007/s40471-022-00307-7. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
9
Intimate Partner Violence and the COVID-19 Pandemic.亲密伴侣暴力与 COVID-19 大流行。
Pediatrics. 2022 Jun 1;149(6). doi: 10.1542/peds.2021-055792.
10
Gender Patterns in the Use of Physical Violence Against a Violent Partner: Results of a Cross-Sectional Population-Based Study in New Zealand.性别模式在针对暴力伴侣的身体暴力使用中:新西兰一项基于人群的横断面研究结果。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Dec;37(23-24):NP22890-NP22920. doi: 10.1177/08862605211073094. Epub 2022 Feb 14.

创伤知情和暴力知情护理在亲密伴侣暴力中的可接受性和可行性。

Acceptability and feasibility of trauma- and violence-informed care for intimate partner violence.

机构信息

Yale University School of Medicine, United States of America; Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, United States of America.

Yale University School of Medicine, United States of America.

出版信息

Child Abuse Negl. 2024 Nov;157:107068. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.107068. Epub 2024 Sep 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.107068
PMID:39332141
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11512670/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Intimate partner violence (IPV) and child physical abuse frequently co-occur, yet IPV-exposed children are not routinely evaluated for abuse. Furthermore, IPV survivors often seek care for their children but not for themselves, making pediatric visits an opportunity to address IPV. We developed a trauma- and violence-informed care (TVIC)-based model that 1) evaluated IPV-exposed children and 2) linked survivor-caregivers to an IPV advocate. We aimed to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the model.

PARTICIPANTS

Children < 3 who were reported to Child Protective Services (CPS) for exposure to IPV and their survivor-caregiver.

METHODS

To examine feasibility, we calculated the percentage of 1) eligible children evaluated and 2) caregivers who met with an IPV advocate during the child's visit and followed up with the advocate. To assess acceptability, we conducted qualitative interviews with 30/41 caregivers about their perceptions of the model.

RESULTS

From 7/1/20-6/30/22, 49 (22.7 %) of 216 eligible children were evaluated. Of 41 caregivers, six already were receiving IPV services; Of the remaining 35, 24 (68.6 %) met with an IPV advocate, and 22 (91.7 %) had ≥1 follow-up visit with an advocate. We identified three themes: 1) Motivations for the visit, 2) Engagement with the model, and 3) Benefits. Caregivers attended the visit due to behavioral concerns about the child and a desire to comply with CPS. Engagement occurred as medical providers established rapport and provided support without judgment. Benefits included recognizing the impact of IPV on the child and immediate linkage to advocacy services.

CONCLUSION

A TVIC-based model is feasible and acceptable and could improve caregivers' engagement with the evaluation of IPV-exposed children for abuse and with IPV services, which have the potential to improve safety and promote well-being.

摘要

背景/目的:亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)和儿童身体虐待经常同时发生,但 IPV 暴露的儿童通常不会接受虐待评估。此外,IPV 幸存者经常为他们的孩子寻求医疗,但不为自己寻求医疗,这使得儿科就诊成为解决 IPV 的机会。我们开发了一种基于创伤和暴力知情护理(TVIC)的模型,该模型 1)评估 IPV 暴露的儿童,2)将幸存者照顾者与 IPV 倡导者联系起来。我们旨在评估该模型的可行性和可接受性。

参与者

向儿童保护服务(CPS)报告的因 IPV 暴露而小于 3 岁的儿童及其幸存者照顾者。

方法

为了检查可行性,我们计算了以下百分比:1)接受评估的合格儿童的百分比,以及 2)在儿童就诊期间与 IPV 倡导者会面并与倡导者跟进的照顾者的百分比。为了评估可接受性,我们对 30/41 名照顾者进行了定性访谈,了解他们对该模型的看法。

结果

从 2022 年 7 月 1 日至 6 月 30 日,49 名(22.7%)符合条件的 216 名儿童接受了评估。在 41 名照顾者中,有 6 名已经在接受 IPV 服务;在其余的 35 名照顾者中,有 24 名(68.6%)与 IPV 倡导者会面,有 22 名(91.7%)与倡导者进行了至少 1 次后续访问。我们确定了三个主题:1)就诊的动机,2)与模型的互动,以及 3)获益。照顾者就诊的原因是对孩子的行为问题感到担忧,并希望遵守 CPS 的要求。当医疗服务提供者建立融洽关系并提供支持而不评判时,就会发生互动。获益包括认识到 IPV 对孩子的影响,以及立即与倡导服务联系。

结论

基于 TVIC 的模型是可行和可接受的,它可以提高照顾者对 IPV 暴露儿童进行虐待评估以及接受 IPV 服务的参与度,这有可能提高安全性并促进幸福感。