Center for Depression Research and Clinical Care, Department of Psychiatry and Peter O'Donnell Jr. Brain Institute, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Center for Depression Research and Clinical Care, Department of Psychiatry and Peter O'Donnell Jr. Brain Institute, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Peter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2023 Aug;151:209085. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2023.209085. Epub 2023 May 26.
The ability for people living with stimulant use disorder to live meaningful lives requires not only abstinence from addictive substances, but also healthy engagement with their community, lifestyle practices, and overall health. The Treatment Effectiveness Assessment (TEA) assesses components of recovery consisting of four functional domains: substance use, health, lifestyle, and community. This secondary data analysis of 403 participants with severe methamphetamine use disorder tested the reliability and validity of the TEA.
Participants were enrolled in the Accelerated Development of Additive Pharmacotherapy Treatment (ADAPT-2) for methamphetamine use disorder. The study used total TEA and domain scores at baseline to assess factor structure and internal consistency, as well as construct validity related to substance cravings (visual analog scale [VAS]), quality of life (quality-of-life assessment [QoL]), mental health (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9], Concise Health Risk Tracking Scale Self-Report [CHRT-SR]), and social support (CHRT-SR).
Individual TEA items showed moderate to large correlations with each other (r = 0.27-0.51; p < .001), and strong correlations to the total score (r = 0.69-0.78; p < .001). Internal consistency was strong (coefficient α = 0.73 [0.68-0.77]; coefficient ω = 0.73 [0.69-0.78]). Construct validity was acceptable, with the strongest correlation between the TEA Health item and the general health status item on the QoL (r = 0.53, p < .001).
TEA has acceptable levels of reliability and validity supporting prior similar findings in a sample of participants with moderate to severe methamphetamine use disorder. Results from this study provide support for its use in assessing clinically meaningful changes beyond simply reduced substance use.
患有兴奋剂使用障碍的人过上有意义的生活,不仅需要戒除成瘾物质,还需要与社区、生活方式和整体健康保持健康的互动。治疗效果评估(TEA)评估了由四个功能领域组成的康复组成部分:药物使用、健康、生活方式和社区。这项针对 403 名重度甲基苯丙胺使用障碍患者的二次数据分析测试了 TEA 的可靠性和有效性。
参与者被纳入加速发展的附加药物治疗(ADAPT-2)治疗甲基苯丙胺使用障碍。该研究使用基线时的总 TEA 和域评分来评估因子结构和内部一致性,以及与药物渴望(视觉模拟量表[VAS])、生活质量(生活质量评估[QoL])、心理健康(患者健康问卷-9[PHQ-9]、简明健康风险跟踪量表自我报告[CHRT-SR])和社会支持(CHRT-SR)相关的结构有效性。
单个 TEA 项目彼此之间呈中度到高度相关(r=0.27-0.51;p<0.001),与总分呈强烈相关(r=0.69-0.78;p<0.001)。内部一致性很强(系数α=0.73[0.68-0.77];系数ω=0.73[0.69-0.78])。结构有效性可接受,TEA 健康项目与 QoL 中一般健康状况项目之间的相关性最强(r=0.53,p<0.001)。
TEA 的可靠性和有效性水平可接受,支持了在中度至重度甲基苯丙胺使用障碍参与者样本中先前类似的发现。这项研究的结果支持了它在评估除了减少物质使用之外的临床有意义的变化方面的使用。