Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ogori Daiichi General Hospital, Ogori, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Department of Orthopaedics, Kuala Lumpur General Hospital, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol. 2022 Apr;27(2):285-293. doi: 10.1142/S2424835522500230. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire is the most widely used patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for assessment of upper extremity disability assessment. However, DASH is a multidimensional measurement with different difficulty levels and ratio apportionment of the items categorised by ordinal scale. This has caused a misinterpretation of the total disability scores. We created a modified DASH adapted to the Rasch model. The aim of this study is to compare the functional recovery and quality of life (QOL) improvement and to assess the validity of the original DASH and modified DASH between C56/C567, C5-8 and total types of brachial plexus injury (BPI) following surgical reconstruction. A total of 183 BPI patients who underwent reconstructive surgery were evaluated for functional recovery using the range of motion and power of the affected limb, and improvement in QOL with DASH. The collected data were analysed using Rasch measurement theory to detect the misfit items. The original and modified DASH were compared under the three different types of BPI after item reduction by removing the misfit items. There were significant differences in functional recovery between three types of palsy. However, PROM using DASH score with or without misfit items (12 items) did not show any significant differences. DASH is not suitable for comparison of upper extremity disabilities even after being corrected mathematically due to the inclusion of items from many different domains unequally. Therefore, each item of the function (with or without compensation of the uninjured hand), pain and impact to the patients should be evaluated separately. Level IV (Prognostic).
手臂、肩部和手部残疾(DASH)问卷是评估上肢残疾最常用的患者报告结局测量(PROM)。然而,DASH 是一个多维测量,项目的难度水平和比例分配不同,由有序量表分类。这导致了对总残疾评分的误解。我们创建了一个经过修正的 DASH,使其适应 Rasch 模型。本研究的目的是比较 C56/C567、C5-8 和总类型臂丛神经损伤(BPI)患者手术后功能恢复和生活质量(QOL)改善的差异,并评估原始 DASH 和修正 DASH 的有效性。共评估了 183 例接受重建手术的 BPI 患者,通过测量患侧肢体的活动范围和力量来评估功能恢复,通过 DASH 评估 QOL 改善。使用 Rasch 测量理论分析收集的数据,以检测不拟合项目。在去除不拟合项目后,通过对三种不同类型的 BPI 进行项目缩减,比较原始和修正的 DASH。三种类型的瘫痪在功能恢复方面存在显著差异。然而,无论是否存在不拟合项目(12 个项目),使用 DASH 评分的 PROM 都没有显示出任何显著差异。由于包含了来自许多不同领域的项目,DASH 并不适合比较上肢残疾,即使经过数学修正也是如此。因此,应分别评估功能(有无未受伤手的补偿)、疼痛和对患者的影响的每个项目。 四级(预后)。