Department of Behavioral Psychology, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2023 Jun;56(3):575-592. doi: 10.1002/jaba.1005. Epub 2023 May 30.
Subtypes of automatically maintained self-injurious behavior (SIB) have been defined based on response patterns observed during the functional analysis, which are thought to reflect each subtype's distinct mechanisms. Current practice for identifying subtypes involves using structured criteria to identify whether SIB is automatically maintained, followed by the application of additional criteria to identify the subtype. We describe a series of studies directed at simplifying these methods to facilitate wider application of the subtyping model in research and practice. In Studies 1 and 2, we demonstrate the accuracy of modified criteria using the level of differentiation of SIB across the play and no-interaction conditions at distinguishing between two subtypes (i.e., Subtypes 1 and 2). We then demonstrate visual analysis (without structured criteria) can accurately identify SIB as automatically maintained in Study 3, which can be used in combination with level of differentiation to enable application of the subtyping model in practice.
自动维持的自我伤害行为(SIB)的亚型是根据功能分析中观察到的反应模式来定义的,这些模式被认为反映了每种亚型的不同机制。目前,确定亚型的方法涉及使用结构化标准来确定 SIB 是否自动维持,然后应用其他标准来确定亚型。我们描述了一系列旨在简化这些方法的研究,以促进亚分型模型在研究和实践中的更广泛应用。在研究 1 和 2 中,我们使用 SIB 在游戏和无交互条件下的分化程度来证明修改后的标准的准确性,以区分两种亚型(即,亚型 1 和 2)。然后,我们在研究 3 中证明了视觉分析(无结构化标准)可以准确识别自动维持的 SIB,这可以与分化程度结合使用,以在实践中应用亚分型模型。