• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

圈养改变了黑叶猴的肠道微生物群。

Captivity restructures the gut microbiota of François' langurs ().

作者信息

Mo Fengxiang, Li Yuhui, Liu Zheng, Zheng Jingjin, Huang Zhonghao

机构信息

Key Laboratory of Ecology and Endangered Species and Environmental Protection (Guangxi Normal University), Ministry of Education, Guilin, China.

Guangxi Key Laboratory of Rare and Endangered Animal Ecology, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, China.

出版信息

Front Microbiol. 2023 May 12;14:1166688. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1166688. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2023.1166688
PMID:37250037
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10218129/
Abstract

Gut microbiota is crucial to primate survival. Data on the gut microbiota of captive and wild animals can provide a physiological and ecological basis for the conservation of rare and endangered species. To study the effect of captivity on the gut microbiota, we examine the difference in the gut microbiota composition between captive and wild Francois' langurs (), using 16S rRNA sequencing technology. The results showed that the composition of the gut microbiota of captive and wild langurs was characterized by Firmicutes (51.93 ± 10.07% vs. 76.15 ± 8.37%) and Bacteroidetes (32.43 ± 10.00% vs. 4.82 ± 1.41%) at the phylum level and was characterized by Oscillospiraceae (15.80 ± 5.19% vs. 30.21 ± 4.87%) at the family level. The alpha diversity of gut microbiota in captive langurs was higher than those in wild, such as the Shannon index (4.45 ± 0.33 vs. 3.98 ± 0.19, < 0.001) and Simpson index (35.11 ± 15.63 vs. 19.02 ± 4.87, < 0.001). Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) results showed significant differences in the composition of gut microbiota between captive and wild langurs at both the phylum and family levels (weight UniFrac algorithm, phylum level: = 0.748, = 0.001; family level: = 0.685, = 0.001). The relative abundance of Firmicutes (51.93 ± 10.07%) in captive langurs was lower than that of wild langurs (76.15 ± 8.37%), and the relative abundance of Bacteroidetes (32.43 ± 10.00%) in captive langurs was higher than that of wild (4.82 ± 1.41%). Our study concludes that dietary composition could be a crucial determinant in shaping the gut microbiota of langurs because more fiber-rich foods used by the wild langurs could increase the abundance of Firmicutes, and more simple carbohydrate-rich foods consumed by the captive langurs increase the abundance of Bacteroidetes. We highlight the importance of captivity on the gut microbiota and the need to consider the gut microbiota in animal provision.

摘要

肠道微生物群对灵长类动物的生存至关重要。圈养动物和野生动物的肠道微生物群数据可为珍稀濒危物种的保护提供生理和生态基础。为了研究圈养对肠道微生物群的影响,我们使用16S rRNA测序技术,检测了圈养和野生黑叶猴肠道微生物群组成的差异。结果表明,在门水平上,圈养和野生黑叶猴肠道微生物群的组成以厚壁菌门(51.93±10.07%对76.15±8.37%)和拟杆菌门(32.43±10.00%对4.82±1.41%)为特征;在科水平上,以颤螺菌科(15.80±5.19%对30.21±4.87%)为特征。圈养黑叶猴肠道微生物群的α多样性高于野生黑叶猴,如香农指数(4.45±0.33对3.98±0.19,P<0.001)和辛普森指数(35.11±15.63对19.02±4.87,P<0.001)。主坐标分析(PCoA)结果表明,圈养和野生黑叶猴在门和科水平上的肠道微生物群组成存在显著差异(加权UniFrac算法,门水平:R=0.748,P=0.001;科水平:R=0.685,P=0.001)。圈养黑叶猴中厚壁菌门的相对丰度(51.93±10.07%)低于野生黑叶猴(76.15±8.37%),圈养黑叶猴中拟杆菌门的相对丰度(32.43±10.00%)高于野生黑叶猴(4.82±1.41%)。我们的研究得出结论,饮食组成可能是塑造黑叶猴肠道微生物群的关键决定因素,因为野生黑叶猴食用的富含纤维的食物更多,这可能会增加厚壁菌门的丰度,而圈养黑叶猴食用的富含简单碳水化合物的食物更多,会增加拟杆菌门的丰度。我们强调了圈养对肠道微生物群的重要性,以及在动物饲养中考虑肠道微生物群的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d38d/10218129/e5b3e5c659f0/fmicb-14-1166688-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d38d/10218129/f5e91c919f84/fmicb-14-1166688-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d38d/10218129/0bf3daebabe4/fmicb-14-1166688-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d38d/10218129/bedef31a2713/fmicb-14-1166688-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d38d/10218129/bc49be2d6db7/fmicb-14-1166688-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d38d/10218129/cdc492c410a7/fmicb-14-1166688-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d38d/10218129/2feed23e1e19/fmicb-14-1166688-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d38d/10218129/9055e0cee1db/fmicb-14-1166688-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d38d/10218129/e5b3e5c659f0/fmicb-14-1166688-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d38d/10218129/f5e91c919f84/fmicb-14-1166688-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d38d/10218129/0bf3daebabe4/fmicb-14-1166688-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d38d/10218129/bedef31a2713/fmicb-14-1166688-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d38d/10218129/bc49be2d6db7/fmicb-14-1166688-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d38d/10218129/cdc492c410a7/fmicb-14-1166688-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d38d/10218129/2feed23e1e19/fmicb-14-1166688-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d38d/10218129/9055e0cee1db/fmicb-14-1166688-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d38d/10218129/e5b3e5c659f0/fmicb-14-1166688-g0008.jpg

相似文献

1
Captivity restructures the gut microbiota of François' langurs ().圈养改变了黑叶猴的肠道微生物群。
Front Microbiol. 2023 May 12;14:1166688. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1166688. eCollection 2023.
2
The composition and function of the gut microbiota of Francois' langurs () depend on the environment and diet.黑叶猴肠道微生物群的组成和功能取决于环境和饮食。
Front Microbiol. 2023 Nov 16;14:1269492. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1269492. eCollection 2023.
3
Evaluation of Gut Microbiota Stability and Flexibility as a Response to Seasonal Variation in the Wild François' Langurs (Trachypithecus francoisi) in Limestone Forest.评价肠道微生物组稳定性和灵活性作为对石灰岩森林中野生弗朗索瓦氏长尾猴(Trachypithecus francoisi)季节性变化的反应。
Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Aug 17;11(4):e0509122. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.05091-22. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
4
Analysis of mortality in François' langurs () managed care in rare animal breeding Center in Wuzhou, Guangxi, China: a 16-year review.中国广西梧州珍稀动物繁育中心黑叶猴(Francois' langurs)管理式照料中的死亡率分析:一项16年回顾
Front Vet Sci. 2024 Aug 14;11:1376265. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1376265. eCollection 2024.
5
Feeding adaptation of François' langurs () to the fragmented limestone habitats in Southwest China.黑叶猴对中国西南部破碎化石灰岩栖息地的觅食适应性
Ecol Evol. 2024 Apr 22;14(4):e11269. doi: 10.1002/ece3.11269. eCollection 2024 Apr.
6
Feeding Postures and Substrate Use of François' Langurs () in the Limestone Forest of Southwest China.中国西南部石灰岩森林中黑叶猴的取食姿势与底物利用
Animals (Basel). 2024 Feb 8;14(4):565. doi: 10.3390/ani14040565.
7
A preliminary study on home range and daily travel distance of François' langur in a high-altitude area.在高海拔地区对弗氏长尾叶猴的家域和日移动距离的初步研究。
Primates. 2023 Mar;64(2):247-259. doi: 10.1007/s10329-022-01041-w. Epub 2022 Dec 29.
8
A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY OF MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY IDENTIFIED AT POSTMORTEM EXAMINATION OF CAPTIVE LANGURS ( SPP) FROM SIX UNITED KINGDOM ZOOLOGICAL INSTITUTIONS: A 19-YEAR REVIEW.对六家英国动物园机构圈养长尾猴( spp )的死后检查中发现的发病率和死亡率的回顾性研究:19 年回顾。
J Zoo Wildl Med. 2021 Dec;52(4):1123-1134. doi: 10.1638/2021-0022.
9
Gut microbiota of white-headed black langurs () in responses to habitat fragmentation.白头叶猴肠道微生物群对栖息地破碎化的响应
Front Microbiol. 2023 Feb 13;14:1126257. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1126257. eCollection 2023.
10
Comparative Gut Microbiome in and Other Primates in Guangxi, China, Based on Metagenome Sequencing.基于宏基因组测序的中国广西地区与其他灵长类动物的比较肠道微生物组。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022 May 4;12:872841. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.872841. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Analysis of Gut Microbiota Between Wild and Captive Guizhou Snub-Nosed Monkey ().野生与圈养黔金丝猴肠道微生物群的比较分析()。 (注:括号部分原文缺失具体内容)
Ecol Evol. 2024 Dec 10;14(12):e70690. doi: 10.1002/ece3.70690. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Geographic and environmental impacts on gut microbiome in Himalayan langurs () and Xizang macaques ().地理和环境对喜马拉雅叶猴()和藏猕猴()肠道微生物群的影响。
Front Microbiol. 2024 Sep 4;15:1452101. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1452101. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Gut microbiota of white-headed black langurs () in responses to habitat fragmentation.白头叶猴肠道微生物群对栖息地破碎化的响应
Front Microbiol. 2023 Feb 13;14:1126257. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1126257. eCollection 2023.
2
Diverse diets and low-fiber, low-tannin foraging preferences: Foraging criteria of Tibetan macaques () at low altitude in Huangshan.多样的饮食以及低纤维、低单宁的觅食偏好:黄山低海拔地区藏酋猴()的觅食标准
Ecol Evol. 2022 Oct 4;12(10):e9338. doi: 10.1002/ece3.9338. eCollection 2022 Oct.
3
Gut firmicutes: Relationship with dietary fiber and role in host homeostasis.
肠道Firmicutes:与膳食纤维的关系及其在宿主稳态中的作用。
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2023 Nov;63(33):12073-12088. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2022.2098249. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
4
Comparative Gut Microbiome in and Other Primates in Guangxi, China, Based on Metagenome Sequencing.基于宏基因组测序的中国广西地区与其他灵长类动物的比较肠道微生物组。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022 May 4;12:872841. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.872841. eCollection 2022.
5
Gut microbiota of ring-tailed lemurs (Lemur catta) vary across natural and captive populations and correlate with environmental microbiota.环尾狐猴(Lemur catta)的肠道微生物群在自然种群和圈养种群中存在差异,并与环境微生物群相关。
Anim Microbiome. 2022 Apr 28;4(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s42523-022-00176-x.
6
Captivity Influences the Gut Microbiome of .圈养影响了……的肠道微生物群。 (原文不完整,翻译可能存在局限性)
Front Microbiol. 2021 Dec 7;12:763022. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.763022. eCollection 2021.
7
Comparative analysis of oral-gut microbiota between captive and wild long-tailed macaque in Thailand.中泰圈养与野生长尾猕猴口腔-肠道微生物群落的比较分析。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 12;11(1):14280. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-93779-4.
8
Diet, habitat environment and lifestyle conversion affect the gut microbiomes of giant pandas.饮食、栖息环境和生活方式的转变会影响大熊猫的肠道微生物组。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 May 20;770:145316. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145316. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
9
Seasonal shifts in the gut microbiome indicate plastic responses to diet in wild geladas.肠道微生物组的季节性变化表明野生狒狒对饮食具有可塑性的反应。
Microbiome. 2021 Jan 23;9(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s40168-020-00977-9.
10
I Like the Way You Eat It: Lemur (Indri indri) Gut Mycobiome and Geophagy.我喜欢你吃的方式:狐猴(Indri indri)肠道微生物群和食土行为。
Microb Ecol. 2021 Jul;82(1):215-223. doi: 10.1007/s00248-020-01677-5. Epub 2021 Jan 20.