Gordon D, Southall D P, Kelly D H, Wilson A, Akselrod S, Richards J, Kenet B, Kenet R, Cohen R J, Shannon D C
Pediatr Res. 1986 Jul;20(7):680-4. doi: 10.1203/00006450-198607000-00021.
Retrospective analyses of patterns of breathing and heart rate variability obtained by visual inspection and spectral analysis of ECG and respiratory activity have provided markers associated with subsequent death in a referred population of infants at high risk for sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). Such markers include breathing patterns characterized by excessive apneic pauses and periodic breathing, heart rate spectra characterized by increased low frequency oscillations, and respiratory activity spectra characterized by a widened "bandwidth" during regular breathing. To test whether such measurements could distinguish SIDS cases and randomly selected controls from a population study the data from 10 cases and 100 age-matched control subjects were analyzed blind. The code was disclosed after completion of the analysis. We found that none of the markers served to distinguish the SIDS cases from the controls in the population at large. This observation may indicate important physiological differences between infants destined to die in the referred high risk population and infants who die of SIDS at large. The possible reasons for our inability to identify the group of SIDS in the general population, as compared to the group of deaths in the referred high risk group are: (1) different disease processes in the two groups, (2) difference responses to the same disease process in the two groups, (3) a response reflecting the psychosocial setting of the referred high risk population, (4) methodological differences between this and previous studies. We conclude that these markers are not of value in screening the population at large.
通过对心电图和呼吸活动进行目视检查及频谱分析所获得的呼吸模式和心率变异性的回顾性分析,已经在一组被转诊的婴儿猝死综合征(SIDS)高危人群中提供了与随后死亡相关的标志物。这些标志物包括以呼吸暂停时间过长和周期性呼吸为特征的呼吸模式、以低频振荡增加为特征的心率频谱,以及以正常呼吸期间“带宽”变宽为特征的呼吸活动频谱。为了测试这些测量方法能否区分SIDS病例和来自人群研究的随机选择的对照,对10例病例和100名年龄匹配的对照受试者的数据进行了盲法分析。分析完成后公布了编码。我们发现,在整个人口中,没有一个标志物能够区分SIDS病例和对照。这一观察结果可能表明,在被转诊的高危人群中注定死亡的婴儿与总体上死于SIDS的婴儿之间存在重要的生理差异。与被转诊的高危组中的死亡组相比,我们无法在一般人群中识别出SIDS组的可能原因有:(1)两组中的疾病过程不同;(2)两组对相同疾病过程的反应不同;(3)反映被转诊的高危人群心理社会背景的一种反应;(4)本研究与以往研究之间的方法学差异。我们得出结论,这些标志物在对整个人口进行筛查时没有价值。