• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种自然语言处理方法,用于对患者安全事件报告中的促成因素进行分类。

A natural language processing approach to categorise contributing factors from patient safety event reports.

机构信息

Center for Biostatistics, Informatics, and Data Science, MedStar Health Research Institute, Washington, District of Columbia, USA

Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Health Care Inform. 2023 May;30(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2022-100731.

DOI:10.1136/bmjhci-2022-100731
PMID:37257922
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10254979/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to explore the use of natural language processing (NLP) algorithm to categorise contributing factors from patient safety event (PSE). Contributing factors are elements in the healthcare process (eg, communication failures) that instigate an event or allow an event to occur. Contributing factors can be used to further investigate why safety events occurred.

METHODS

We used 10 years of self-reported PSE reports from a multihospital healthcare system in the USA. Reports were first selected by event date. We calculated χ values for each ngram in the bag-of-words then selected N ngrams with the highest χ values. Then, PSE reports were filtered to only include the sentences containing the selected ngrams. Such sentences were called information-rich sentences. We compared two feature extraction techniques from free-text data: (1) baseline bag-of-words features and (2) features from information-rich sentences. Three machine learning algorithms were used to categorise five contributing factors representing sociotechnical errors: communication/hand-off failure, technology issue, policy/procedure issue, distractions/interruptions and lapse/slip. We trained 15 binary classifiers (five contributing factors * three machine learning models). The models' performances were evaluated according to the area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC), precision, recall, and F1-score.

RESULTS

Applying the information-rich sentence selection algorithm boosted the contributing factor categorisation performance. Comparing the AUPRCs, the proposed NLP approach improved the categorisation performance of two and achieved comparable results with baseline in categorising three contributing factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Information-rich sentence selection can be incorporated to extract the sentences in free-text event narratives in which the contributing factor information is embedded.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探索使用自然语言处理(NLP)算法对患者安全事件(PSE)的促成因素进行分类。促成因素是医疗过程中的要素(例如,沟通失败),它们引发或允许事件发生。促成因素可用于进一步调查安全事件发生的原因。

方法

我们使用了美国一家多医院医疗保健系统 10 年来的自我报告 PSE 报告。报告首先按事件日期进行选择。我们计算了词汇袋中每个 ngram 的 χ 值,然后选择 χ 值最高的 N ngrams。然后,PSE 报告被过滤只包含包含所选 ngrams 的句子。这样的句子称为信息丰富的句子。我们比较了两种从自由文本数据中提取特征的技术:(1)基线词汇袋特征和(2)信息丰富句子的特征。我们使用三种机器学习算法来对代表社会技术错误的五个促成因素进行分类:沟通/交接失败、技术问题、政策/程序问题、干扰/中断和失误/疏忽。我们训练了 15 个二进制分类器(五个促成因素*三种机器学习模型)。根据精度-召回曲线下面积(AUPRC)、精度、召回率和 F1 分数来评估模型的性能。

结果

应用信息丰富的句子选择算法提高了促成因素分类性能。通过比较 AUPRC,所提出的 NLP 方法提高了对两个促成因素的分类性能,并在分类三个促成因素方面取得了与基线相当的结果。

结论

可以将信息丰富的句子选择纳入从自由文本事件叙述中提取嵌入促成因素信息的句子。

相似文献

1
A natural language processing approach to categorise contributing factors from patient safety event reports.一种自然语言处理方法,用于对患者安全事件报告中的促成因素进行分类。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2023 May;30(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2022-100731.
2
Realizing the Power of Text Mining and Natural Language Processing for Analyzing Patient Safety Event Narratives: The Challenges and Path Forward.实现文本挖掘和自然语言处理在分析患者安全事件叙述中的作用:挑战与前进道路。
J Patient Saf. 2021 Dec 1;17(8):e834-e836. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000837.
3
Social Reminiscence in Older Adults' Everyday Conversations: Automated Detection Using Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning.老年人日常对话中的社会怀旧:使用自然语言处理和机器学习的自动检测。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 15;22(9):e19133. doi: 10.2196/19133.
4
A Machine Learning Approach with Human-AI Collaboration for Automated Classification of Patient Safety Event Reports: Algorithm Development and Validation Study.一种人机协作的机器学习方法用于患者安全事件报告的自动分类:算法开发与验证研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Jan 25;11:e53378. doi: 10.2196/53378.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Medical subdomain classification of clinical notes using a machine learning-based natural language processing approach.基于机器学习的自然语言处理方法对临床笔记进行医学子域分类。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Dec 1;17(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0556-8.
7
A clinical text classification paradigm using weak supervision and deep representation.一种使用弱监督和深度表示的临床文本分类范式。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Jan 7;19(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12911-018-0723-6.
8
An Intelligent System for Classifying Patient Complaints Using Machine Learning and Natural Language Processing: Development and Validation Study.一种使用机器学习和自然语言处理对患者投诉进行分类的智能系统:开发与验证研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 8;27:e55721. doi: 10.2196/55721.
9
Identifying Functional Status Impairment in People Living With Dementia Through Natural Language Processing of Clinical Documents: Cross-Sectional Study.通过对临床文档的自然语言处理识别痴呆患者的功能状态障碍:横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Feb 13;26:e47739. doi: 10.2196/47739.
10
Automating sedation state assessments using natural language processing.使用自然语言处理自动进行镇静状态评估。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2025 Jan;57(1):17-27. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12968. Epub 2024 Mar 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Automatically Identifying Event Reports of Workplace Violence and Communication Failures using Large Language Models.使用大语言模型自动识别工作场所暴力和沟通失败的事件报告。
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2025 Jun 10;2025:74-83. eCollection 2025.
2
Co-producing a safe mobility and falls informatics platform to drive meaningful quality improvement in the hospital setting: a mixed-methods protocol for the study.共同打造一个安全移动与跌倒信息学平台,以推动医院环境中有意义的质量改进:该研究的混合方法方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 3;15(2):e082053. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082053.
3
Evaluation of a Natural Language Processing Approach to Identify Diagnostic Errors and Analysis of Safety Learning System Case Review Data: Retrospective Cohort Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Realizing the Power of Text Mining and Natural Language Processing for Analyzing Patient Safety Event Narratives: The Challenges and Path Forward.实现文本挖掘和自然语言处理在分析患者安全事件叙述中的作用:挑战与前进道路。
J Patient Saf. 2021 Dec 1;17(8):e834-e836. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000837.
2
Predicting presumed serious infection among hospitalized children on central venous lines with machine learning.机器学习预测中心静脉置管住院患儿疑似严重感染。
Comput Biol Med. 2021 May;132:104289. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104289. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
3
Identification of breast cancer patients with pathologic complete response in the breast after neoadjuvant systemic treatment by an intelligent vacuum-assisted biopsy.
自然语言处理方法评估诊断错误及安全学习系统病例回顾数据分析:回顾性队列研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 26;26:e50935. doi: 10.2196/50935.
4
Artificial intelligence in healthcare: Opportunities come with landmines.医疗保健领域的人工智能:机遇与风险并存。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2024 Jun 5;31(1):e101086. doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2024-101086.
5
Risk Management and Patient Safety in the Artificial Intelligence Era: A Systematic Review.人工智能时代的风险管理与患者安全:一项系统综述。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Feb 27;12(5):549. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12050549.
智能真空辅助活检识别新辅助全身治疗后乳腺病理完全缓解的乳腺癌患者。
Eur J Cancer. 2021 Jan;143:134-146. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.11.006. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
4
A Scalable Natural Language Processing for Inferring BT-RADS Categorization from Unstructured Brain Magnetic Resonance Reports.一种可扩展的自然语言处理方法,用于从非结构化的脑部磁共振报告中推断 BT-RADS 分类。
J Digit Imaging. 2020 Dec;33(6):1393-1400. doi: 10.1007/s10278-020-00350-0.
5
Learning from Patient Safety Incidents in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review.从急诊科的患者安全事件中学习:系统评价。
J Emerg Med. 2020 Feb;58(2):234-244. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2019.11.015. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
6
Classifying Safety Events Related to Diagnostic Imaging From a Safety Reporting System Using a Human Factors Framework.基于人为因素框架对安全报告系统中与诊断成像相关的安全事件进行分类。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2019 Mar;16(3):282-288. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.10.015. Epub 2018 Dec 7.
7
Inter-rater reliability of medication error classification in a voluntary patient safety incident reporting system HaiPro in Finland.芬兰 HaiPro 自愿性患者安全事件报告系统中药物错误分类的评价者间信度。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2019 Jul;15(7):864-872. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.11.013. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
8
Development of a theoretical framework of factors affecting patient safety incident reporting: a theoretical review of the literature.影响患者安全事件报告的因素的理论框架构建:文献的理论综述
BMJ Open. 2017 Dec 27;7(12):e017155. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017155.
9
Making Patient Safety Event Data Actionable: Understanding Patient Safety Analyst Needs.使患者安全事件数据具有可操作性:了解患者安全分析师的需求。
J Patient Saf. 2021 Sep 1;17(6):e509-e514. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000400.
10
International recommendations for national patient safety incident reporting systems: an expert Delphi consensus-building process.国家患者安全事件报告系统的国际建议:专家德尔菲共识达成过程
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Feb;26(2):150-163. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004456. Epub 2016 Feb 22.