Suppr超能文献

指南指导下的药物治疗快速滴定对生活质量的影响:来自 STRONG-HF 试验的见解。

Impact of Rapid Up-Titration of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapies on Quality of Life: Insights From the STRONG-HF Trial.

机构信息

Clinic of Cardiac and Vascular Diseases, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Lithuania (J.Č., K.Č-B.).

Université Paris Cité, INSERM UMR-S 942 (MASCOT), France (G.C., A.C.-S., E.G., V.L., A.M., B.D.).

出版信息

Circ Heart Fail. 2024 Apr;17(4):e011221. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.123.011221. Epub 2024 Mar 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This analysis provides details on baseline and changes in quality of life (QoL) and its components as measured by EQ-5D-5L questionnaire, as well as association with objective outcomes, applying high-intensity heart failure (HF) care in patients with acute HF.

METHODS

In STRONG-HF trial (Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Rapid Optimization, Helped by NT-proBNP Testing, of Heart Failure Therapies) patients with acute HF were randomized just before discharge to either usual care or a high-intensity care strategy of guideline-directed medical therapy up-titration. Patients ranked their state of health on the EQ-5D visual analog scale score ranging from 0 (the worst imaginable health) to 100 (the best imaginable health) at baseline and at 90 days follow-up.

RESULTS

In 1072 patients with acute HF with available assessment of QoL (539/533 patients assigned high-intensity care/usual care) the mean baseline EQ-visual analog scale score was 59.2 (SD, 15.1) with no difference between the treatment groups. Patients with lower baseline EQ-visual analog scale (meaning worse QoL) were more likely to be women, self-reported Black and non-European (<0.001). The strongest independent predictors of a greater improvement in QoL were younger age (<0.001), no HF hospitalization in the previous year (<0.001), lower NYHA class before hospital admission (<0.001) and high-intensity care treatment (mean difference, 4.2 [95% CI, 2.5-5.8]; <0.001). No statistically significant heterogeneity in the benefits of high-intensity care was seen across patient subgroups of different ages, with left ventricular ejection fraction above or below 40%, NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) and systolic blood pressure above or below the median value. The treatment effect on the primary end point did not vary significantly across baseline EQ-visual analog scale (=0.87).

CONCLUSIONS

Early up-titration of guideline-directed medical therapy significantly improves all dimensions of QoL in patients with HF and improves prognosis regardless of baseline self-assessed health status. The likelihood of achieving optimal doses of HF medications does not depend on baseline QoL.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03412201.

摘要

背景

本分析详细介绍了应用高强度心力衰竭(HF)治疗急性 HF 患者时,基于 EQ-5D-5L 问卷测量的生活质量(QoL)及其组成部分的基线和变化情况,以及与客观结局的关联。

方法

在 STRONG-HF 试验(急性 HF 患者 NT-proBNP 测试辅助的快速优化的安全性、耐受性和疗效)中,在出院前,急性 HF 患者被随机分为常规治疗组或高强度治疗策略组,即指南指导的药物治疗滴定。患者在基线和 90 天随访时,使用 EQ-5D 视觉模拟评分量表(range from 0 to 100)对自己的健康状况进行评分。

结果

在 1072 例急性 HF 患者中(539/533 例患者接受高强度治疗/常规治疗),可评估 QoL 的患者的平均基线 EQ-视觉模拟量表评分为 59.2(SD,15.1),两组之间无差异。基线 EQ-视觉模拟量表评分较低(意味着 QoL 较差)的患者更可能为女性,自我报告为黑人且非欧洲裔(<0.001)。QoL 显著改善的最强独立预测因素为年龄较轻(<0.001)、前一年无 HF 住院史(<0.001)、入院前 NYHA 分级较低(<0.001)和高强度治疗(平均差异,4.2[95%CI,2.5-5.8];<0.001)。在不同年龄亚组的患者中,高强度治疗的获益没有明显的异质性,左心室射血分数高于或低于 40%、N 末端脑利钠肽前体(N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide)和收缩压高于或低于中位数的患者。治疗对主要终点的影响在基线 EQ-视觉模拟量表(=0.87)上没有显著差异。

结论

早期强化指南指导的药物治疗可显著改善 HF 患者的所有 QoL 维度,并改善预后,无论基线自我评估的健康状况如何。达到 HF 药物最佳剂量的可能性并不取决于基线 QoL。

登记

网址:https://www.clinicaltrials.gov;唯一标识符:NCT03412201。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验