Tatsuta Daishiro, Nakao Motoki, Nagai Toshiyuki, Mizuguchi Yoshifumi, Yokota Isao, Koya Taro, Tada Atsushi, Ishizaka Suguru, George Fusako, Kato Yoshiya, Imagawa Shogo, Motoi Ko, Tokuda Yusuke, Takahashi Masashige, Matsumoto Junichi, Machida Masaharu, Okamoto Hiroshi, Saito Takahiko, Anzai Toshihisa
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
JACC Adv. 2025 Jul 17;4(8):101972. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101972.
There are little data on clinically meaningful heart failure (HF) phenogroups, which are associated with treatment response across the wide spectrum of left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction.
The authors aimed to identify the phenotypes of patients with HF with different prognoses and responses to medical therapies.
We examined consecutive 2,301 chronic HF patients from the ELMSTAT-HF (EpidemioLogical Multicenter Study for Tailored Treatment in Heart Failure) registry, a prospective multicenter cohort in which 2,317 patients were enrolled between January 2020 and September 2024. Latent class analysis was performed using 99 clinical features. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death and hospitalization for worsening HF.
The analysis subclassified the patients into 8 phenogroups: group 1, characterized by younger age with obesity; 2, less structural abnormality and comorbidity; 3, younger age with LV dilation; 4, LV hypertrophy; 5, older age with small LV and diastolic dysfunction; 6, ischemic cardiomyopathy; 7, advanced LV remodeling and ventricular arrhythmias; and 8, atrial myopathy. During a median follow-up of 597 (IQR: 302-932) days, the incidence of the primary outcome significantly differed between the phenogroups (P < 0.001). In phenogroup 5, patients taking beta-blockers or sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors had a significantly higher rate of hospitalization for worsening HF (HR: 2.20; 95% CI: 1.04-4.68; HR: 4.27; 95% CI: 2.02-9.05, respectively).
We identified 8 phenogroups with distinct clinical outcomes in patients with HF. This phenotyping provides appropriate risk stratification and may aid clinical decision-making in patients with HF.
关于具有临床意义的心力衰竭(HF)表型组的数据较少,这些表型组与广泛的左心室(LV)射血分数范围内的治疗反应相关。
作者旨在确定具有不同预后和对药物治疗反应的HF患者的表型。
我们检查了来自ELMSTAT-HF(心力衰竭个体化治疗的流行病学多中心研究)登记处的2301例连续慢性HF患者,这是一项前瞻性多中心队列研究,在2020年1月至2024年9月期间招募了2317例患者。使用99项临床特征进行潜在类别分析。主要结局是全因死亡和因HF恶化住院的复合结局。
分析将患者分为8个表型组:第1组,以年轻肥胖为特征;第2组,结构异常和合并症较少;第3组,年轻且左心室扩张;第4组,左心室肥厚;第5组,老年且左心室小和舒张功能障碍;第6组,缺血性心肌病;第7组,晚期左心室重构和室性心律失常;第8组,心房肌病。在中位随访597(IQR:302-932)天期间,各表型组的主要结局发生率有显著差异(P<0.001)。在第5表型组中,服用β受体阻滞剂或钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂的患者因HF恶化住院的发生率显著更高(HR:2.20;95%CI:1.04-4.68;HR:4.27;95%CI:2.02-9.05,分别)。
我们在HF患者中确定了8个具有不同临床结局的表型组。这种表型分析提供了适当的风险分层,并可能有助于HF患者的临床决策。