Department of Natural Sciences, Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, Russia; Institute of Cytology and Genetics, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
J Pain. 2023 Oct;24(10):1875-1885. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2023.05.012. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
We conducted a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study to examine the causal effects of six personality traits (anxiety, neuroticism, extraversion, openness to experience, agreeableness, and conscientiousness) on back pain associated with health care use and the causal effect of back pain on the same risk factors. Genetic instruments for the personality traits and back pain were obtained from the largest published genome-wide association studies conducted in individuals of European ancestry. We used inverse weighted variance meta-analysis and Causal Analysis Using Summary Effect for primary analyses and sensitivity analyses to examine evidence for causal associations. We interpreted exposure-outcome associations as being consistent with a causal relationship if results of at least one primary analysis were statistically significant after accounting for multiple statistical testing (P-value < .0042), and the direction and magnitude of effect estimates were concordant between primary and sensitivity analyses. We found evidence for statistically significant bidirectional causal associations between neuroticism and back pain, with odds ratio 1.51 (95% confidence interval 1.37; 1.67) of back pain per neuroticism sum score standard deviation, P-value = 7.80e-16; and beta = .12, se = .04 of neuroticism sum score standard deviation per log odds of back pain, P-value = 2.48e-03. Other relationships did not meet our predefined criteria for causal association. PERSPECTIVE: The significant positive feedback loop between neuroticism and back pain highlights the importance of considering neuroticism in the management of patients with back pain.
我们进行了一项双向孟德尔随机化研究,以检验六种人格特质(焦虑、神经质、外向性、开放性、宜人性和尽责性)对与医疗保健使用相关的背痛的因果影响,以及背痛对相同风险因素的因果效应。人格特质和背痛的遗传工具来自在欧洲血统个体中进行的最大规模的已发表全基因组关联研究。我们使用逆加权方差荟萃分析和汇总效应因果分析进行主要分析和敏感性分析,以检验因果关联的证据。如果至少一项主要分析在考虑到多次统计检验(P 值<0.0042)后具有统计学意义,则我们将暴露-结局关联解释为与因果关系一致,并且主要分析和敏感性分析之间的效应估计方向和大小一致。我们发现神经质和背痛之间存在统计学上显著的双向因果关联,每标准神经质总分标准差的背痛比值比为 1.51(95%置信区间为 1.37;1.67),P 值=7.80e-16;神经质总分标准差每对数背痛几率的β值为 0.12,标准误为 0.04,P 值=2.48e-03。其他关系不符合我们对因果关联的预设标准。观点:神经质和背痛之间的显著正反馈循环突出了在背痛患者的管理中考虑神经质的重要性。