Honghui-Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710054, China.
Yan'an Medical University, Yan'an, 716099, China.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Aug 1;25(1):612. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07727-0.
Mendelian randomization (MR) studies have an advantage over conventional observational studies when studying the causal effect of lifestyle-related risk factors on back pain. However, given the heterogeneous design of existing MR studies on back pain, the reported causal estimates of these effects remain equivocal, thus obscuring the true extent of the biological effects of back pain lifestyle-risk factors.
The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review with multiple meta-analyses on the associations between various lifestyle factors and low back pain.
We conducted a PRISMA systematic review and specifically included MR studies to investigate the associations between lifestyle factors-specifically, BMI, insomnia, smoking, alcohol consumption, and leisure sedentary behavior-and various back pain outcomes. Each meta-analysis synthesized data from three or more studies to assess the causal impact of these exposures on distinct back pain outcomes, including chronic pain, disability, and pain severity. Quality of studies was assessed according to STROBE-MR guidelines.
A total of 1576 studies were evaluated and 20 were included. Overall, the studies included were of high quality and had a low risk of bias. Our meta-analysis demonstrates the positive causal effect of BMI (OR : 1.18 [1.08-1.30]), insomnia(OR : 1.38 [1.10-1.74]), smoking(OR : 1.30 [1.23-1.36]), alcohol consumption(OR : 1.31 [1.21-1.42]) and leisure sedentary behaviors(OR : 1.52 [1.02-2.25]) on back pain.
In light of the disparate designs and causal effect estimates presented in numerous MR studies, our meta-analysis establishes a compelling argument that lifestyle-related risk factors such as BMI, insomnia, smoking, alcohol consumption, and leisure sedentary behaviors genuinely contribute to the biological development of back pain.
与传统观察性研究相比,孟德尔随机化(MR)研究在研究与生活方式相关的风险因素对背痛的因果效应时具有优势。然而,鉴于现有背痛 MR 研究的设计存在异质性,这些影响的报告因果估计仍然存在争议,从而掩盖了背痛生活方式风险因素的真实生物学效应程度。
本研究旨在进行系统综述和多次荟萃分析,探讨各种生活方式因素与下腰痛之间的关系。
我们进行了 PRISMA 系统综述,特别纳入了 MR 研究,以调查生活方式因素(具体为 BMI、失眠、吸烟、饮酒和休闲久坐行为)与各种下腰痛结局之间的关联。每项荟萃分析均综合了来自三项或更多研究的数据,以评估这些暴露对不同下腰痛结局(包括慢性疼痛、残疾和疼痛严重程度)的因果影响。根据 STROBE-MR 指南评估研究质量。
共评估了 1576 项研究,纳入了 20 项研究。总体而言,纳入的研究质量较高,偏倚风险较低。我们的荟萃分析表明,BMI(OR:1.18[1.08-1.30])、失眠(OR:1.38[1.10-1.74])、吸烟(OR:1.30[1.23-1.36])、饮酒(OR:1.31[1.21-1.42])和休闲久坐行为(OR:1.52[1.02-2.25])对背痛有正向因果效应。
鉴于众多 MR 研究提出的不同设计和因果效应估计,我们的荟萃分析有力地证明了与生活方式相关的风险因素,如 BMI、失眠、吸烟、饮酒和休闲久坐行为,确实会导致背痛的生物学发展。